Evaluation of Staple Watson Wrist Arthrodesis (ESWWA)

May 22, 2023 updated by: Rennes University Hospital

When the wrist is damaged, for traumatic or degenerative reasons, the cartilage is worn out and the bones rub together: this is osteoarthritis. In order to stop this pain, it may be necessary to block these bones from each other, sacrificing mobility to achieve indolence.

Multiple techniques are described according to the type of osteoarthritis and for each type of osteoarthritis itself, but the principle remains the same. The methods currently commonly proposed are the staple and the screwed plate.

The aim of the study is to evaluate the surgical practice of the Orthopaedics and Traumatology department of the University Hospital of Rennes, and its long-term results, as this type of surgery is intended to be definitive.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The surgery performed in the Orthopaedics and Traumatology department of the University Hospital of Rennes, has 2 notable points: its technique and its equipment.

  • The procedure is based on the staples 4Fusion1 (Stryker/Memometal), which is still poorly assessed in the literature.
  • The surgical procedure has several technical specificities: intra osseous cartilage freshening and preservation of the lunotriquetral ligament if intact.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

41

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Rennes, France, 35033
        • CHU de Rennes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult Patients
  • All patients operated on for a 4-bones arthrodesis performed by stapling at the CHU RENNES between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2017 with 4fusion stapling
  • Patients who gave consent after full information

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate after information
  • Protected adults
  • Person deprived of liberty

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Arthrodesis surgery patients
A follow-up consultation is organized which includes: A clinical examination with standard data collection as well as a face and profile radiograph of the operated wrist.
A follow-up consultation is organized which includes: A clinical examination with standard data collection as well as a face and profile radiograph of the operated wrist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of the surgical procedure
Time Frame: Day 1
Assessement of the bones consolidation at at least 6 weeks post-surgery, using a radiological criterion : 3 out of 4 line spacing merged
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain assessment
Time Frame: Day 1

Evolution in pain reported by the patient by a pain assessment scale, with reference to preoperative assessment.

Evaluation is based on the visual analog scale (VAS) in which the patients select a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of their pain

Day 1
Grip force
Time Frame: Day 1
Change of the grip force measured by Jamar's hydraulic dynamometer, compared to pre-operative assessment
Day 1
Functional assessment of the wrist with Mayo Wrist Score
Time Frame: Day 1
International validated functional score. This evaluation yields a total score out of 100 points qualified as poor if <65 up to Excellent if >90.
Day 1
Functional assessment of the wrist with Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 1
International validated functional score. The Quick DASH tool uses a 5-point Likert scale from which the patient can select an appropriate number corresponding to his/her severity level/ function level
Day 1
Functional assessment of the wrist with Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation
Time Frame: Day 1
International validated functional score. The Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) allows patients to rate their levels of wrist pain and disability from 0 to 10
Day 1
Patient's overall satisfaction about surgery
Time Frame: Day 1
Patient's overall satisfaction assessed by the question: "Would you do the surgery again? (balance between 0 and 10)"
Day 1
Material hindrance
Time Frame: Day 1
Specific items assessed during clinical evaluations. Quoted as 1 if at least one of the following events is evoked : Material-related pain, skin irritation, re-intervention for remote ablation
Day 1
Mean mobility arc
Time Frame: Day 1
Measurement of the arc of mobility in flexion - extension by goniometer
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Warren KIM, MD, Chu Rennes

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 3, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 7, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 7, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 35RC19_8861
  • 2019-A01553-54 (Other Identifier: Id-RCB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis Wrist

Clinical Trials on Follow-up consultation

Subscribe