Intra-articular Pulsed Radiofrequency Neuromodulation Versus Intra-articular Steroids for Painful Knee Osteoarthritis

March 29, 2023 updated by: Center For Interventional Pain and Spine

Sham-controlled Randomized Trial of Intra-articular Pulsed Radiofrequency Neuromodulation Versus Intra-articular Steroids for Painful Knee Osteoarthritis

To compare the efficacy of intra-articular pulsed radiofrequency to intra-articular steroids in patients with moderate-severe painful osteoarthritis of the knee.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients Adult patients with intractable knee pain for more than 6 months and radiographic evidence of grade II, III or IV knee osteoarthritis. Must not have had a knee injection or other interventional procedure for knee pain within the past 12 weeks. Must be on stable medications for the past 12 weeks and willing to keep medications stable for the first 12 weeks of the study.

Study Design Pilot study will enroll 30 patients randomized 1:1:1.

  1. Active control - intra-articular 4 milliliters 0.5% bupivacaine + 10mg dexamethasone + sham Pulsed Radiofrequency
  2. Placebo control - intra-articular 5 milliliters 0.9% saline + sham Pulsed Radiofrequency
  3. Treatment group - intra-articular 5 milliliters 0.5% bupivacaine + Pulsed Radiofrequency

Methods Two 18-gauge radiofrequency needle with 10 millimeter active tip will be placed intra-articularly from an anterolateral and anteromedial approach to target the medial and lateral compartments. Once satisfactory fluoroscopic placement is noted, the Pulsed Radiofrequency or sham-Pulsed Radiofrequency treatment will be administered. Subsequently, the injectate will be administered. Dexamethasone is selected as the corticosteroid as it is colorless and will be indistinguishable from the saline used in the Intra-articular Pulsed Radiofrequency and placebo groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Exton, Pennsylvania, United States, 19341
        • Center for Interventional Pain and Spine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Capable of giving written informed consent
  • Patients aged 18 years or older
  • Patients with unilateral or bilateral knee pain for at least 3 months
  • Radiographic evidence of knee osteoarthritis
  • Appropriate candidate for steroid injection as determined by the investigator

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic knee pain caused by infection, inflammation, tumors, and fractures
  • A history of acute knee pain, previous knee surgery, connective tissue diseases, progressive neurologic disease or uncontrolled psychiatric disorders
  • The administration of steroids or hyaluronic acids within the last three months
  • Coagulation disorders
  • Local infection at the site of intervention planned
  • Active litigation related to this pain complaint

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Active
intra-articular 4 milliliters 0.5% bupivacaine + 10mg dexamethasone + sham Pulsed Radiofrequency
Two 20-gauge radiofrequency needle with 10mm active tip will be placed intra-articularly from an anterolateral and anteromedial approach to target the medial and lateral compartments. Once satisfactory fluoroscopic placement is noted, the Placebo Intra-Articular treatment will be administered.
Placebo Comparator: Control
intra-articular 5 milliliters 0.9% saline + sham Pulsed Radiofrequency
Two 20-gauge radiofrequency needle with 10mm active tip will be placed intra-articularly from an anterolateral and anteromedial approach to target the medial and lateral compartments. Once satisfactory fluoroscopic placement is noted, the Intra-Articular treatment will be administered.
Experimental: Experimental
intra-articular 5 milliliters 0.5% bupivacaine + Pulsed Radiofrequency
Two 20-gauge radiofrequency needle with 10mm active tip will be placed intra-articularly from an anterolateral and anteromedial approach to target the medial and lateral compartments. Once satisfactory fluoroscopic placement is noted, the Pulsed Radiofrequency treatment will be administered.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Visual Analogue Scale pain scores
Time Frame: 1-week, 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months
Evaluates the level of pain. Minimum=0 Maximum=10, Larger number indicates worse outcome
1-week, 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (Index)
Time Frame: 1-week, 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months
Evaluates level of pain. For Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29, Minimum= 8 and Maximum=40. For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (Index), Minimum=0 Maximum=20. Larger number indicates worse outcome
1-week, 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months
Change in Analgesic use
Time Frame: 1-week, 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months
Evaluates number of medications, doses of medications
1-week, 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months
Change in Timed Up and Go Test
Time Frame: 1-week, 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months
Evaluates physical mobility
1-week, 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months
Change in Progression to Surgery
Time Frame: 1-week, 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months
Evaluates effectiveness of treatment
1-week, 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael A Fishman, MD, Center for Interventional Pain and Spine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 8, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 19, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019IA-PRF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Placebo Intra-Articular Injection

3
Subscribe