Mathematic Modeling at Micro and Macroscopic Level of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphomas (PCNSL) (LOC-MODEL)

February 17, 2022 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
We plan to analyze 100 PCNSL homogenously treated with high-dose methotrexate based chemotherapy using NGS of PCNSL samples. We will perform DNA-seq and RNA-seq from tumor samples. This data will be combined with their magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at different time points: at diagnosis, at the end of the treatment and at disease progression. Among the 100 PCNSL that will be included, 70 will be from a retrospective (training set) from patients included in the French National PCNSL dataset (LOC cohort) and 30 PCNSL from a prospective cohort from patients included in a phase III clinical trial (BLOCAGE, PHRC 2014). On the one hand, we will perform a radiomics analysis (quantitative imaging) using 3D tumor and edema segmentation. This analysis will help us to elucidate the potential correlation of MRI phenotypes and genotype (using high-throughput data). In addition, we will use the radiomics data combined with in vitro and in vivo data (using a mouse model of PCNSL) as well as immunohistochemistry data to obtain a multidimensional mathematical modeling of PCNSL clinical evolution that will allow us to better predict the clinical course of this rare subtype of brain tumor.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL) are extra-nodal, malignant non-Hodgkin lymphomas of diffuse large B-cell type confined to the CNS or eyes without evidence of systemic spread. PCNSL account for up to 1% of all lymphomas and 3% of primary brain tumors. Despite recent progress in PCNSL treatment, remissions are short lasting and the outcome remains poor with a minority of long-term survivors (20%). Moreover, treatments expose patients to a high risk of neurotoxicity. Even though PCNSL has been extensively studied, the pathogenic mechanisms underlying its remarkable tropism and its peculiar clinical behaviour are not well elucidated. Since 2010, the French National Institute of Cancer (INCa) has supported the creation of medical networks dedicated to rare cancers, including PCNSL (LOC network). LOC has developed a national clinical database of newly diagnosed PCNSL with a virtual tumor database to perform translational studies. Furthermore, LOC has launched several prospective trials including a phase III clinical trial (BLOCAGE - PHRC 2014) with an expected sample size of 300 patients to perform ancillary analysis. Modeling malignant extracerebral/systemic non-Hodgkin lymphoma therapy and outcome has been previously performed, however due to its peculiar anatomical and immunoprivileged microenvironment, and its specific therapeutic management, specific modeling of PCNSL is required. Interestingly, in glioblastoma, another primary brain tumor, a model prediction of expected tumor burden provided a personalized assessment of a therapy's effectiveness. Therefore, a comprehensive mechanistic view of mathematical modeling of PCNSL growth and treatment response could be used to better stratify PCNSL evolution and to predict the best treatment options. From a radiological point of view, PCNSL often display a characteristic presentation with periventricular contrast enhancing lesions. This is due to its hypercellularity, high nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio, disruption of the blood-brain barrier, and its predilection for the periventricular and superficial regions often in contact with ventricular or meningeal surface. Interestingly, some small studies suggest that the integration of radiological and high-throughput data would help to stratify the prognosis of PCNSL. In addition, MRI assesses therapeutic response but this evaluation lacks of sensitivity to detect non-enhancing lesions. Radiomics is a promising new paradigm for extending clinical imaging into the era of molecular and genomic imaging. Interesting results using MRI and molecular phenotypes have been obtained in different cancers and very recently in glioblastomas4. However, there is only some evidence suggesting that molecular phenotype of PCNSL could be related to some particular imaging morphophenotypes. Interestingly, our team has recently identified a potential molecular-radiological association between the presence of TERT promoter mutations and the localization of PCNSL within corpus callosum. Furthermore, using MRI data (macroscopic data) will be also used to explore predictors of MRI patterns in a multivariate framework, we will develop a linear modeling approach that measures the association of MRI patterns with a number of potential predictors, including expression levels on a gene-by-gene basis, driver mutations and clinical variables. Somatically acquired mutation and cytogenetic lesion will be encoded as being present/absent. We choose a linear model due to its interpretability and established statistical methods, enabling us to test which MRI morphological pattern are associated with deregulated transcripts in the presence of specific alterations after correcting for other confounding factors and other clinical variables and coexisting driver mutations. The total variance in the MRI data will be studied and dissected using data from selected driver genes, cytogenetic lesion and the most relevant principal components of MRI data will be analyzed in a Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) penalized model. The optimal model maximizes the explained variance R2.

We will evaluate prognosis accuracy of survival models using Harrel's C statistic, as implemented in Hmisc R package. This statistic measures the fraction of pairs of patients with concordant risk predictions, and outcome similarly to the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. To reduce the bias of estimated risk, we will use a fivefold cross-validating scheme. In addition, we will also analyze survival impact of this multidimensional data using random forest as an alternative approach for predicting outcome and measuring variable importance. These are implemented in the randomForesetSRC R package. the preliminary results obtained on a sub sample of patient showed that the 100 patient cohort will be sufficient to build and assess the predictive values of the models we will study. Tools to integrate multiple sources data set described above for a small subset will be scaled up using all the variables available from the complete dataset: non negative matrix co-factorization and regularized generalized canonical correlation analysis.

Patient prognosis may tightly correlate with a characteristic morphological tumor phenotype on the histological level and with tumor shape, which itself may correlate with the gene expression pattern. For this reason, macro-level growth simulations with the above statistical model will be complemented by simulations with mechanistic models at the histological level, and at whole tumor level. The histological-level model will be calibrated with experiments using diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cell lines co-cultured with other microenvironment cells like glial cells, and with murine experiments. This model shall shed light on the mechanisms at cell level capable of explaining the observed cell proliferation and multicellular arrangement pattern.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75013
        • Groupe Hospitalier la Pitié Salpêtrière

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

PCNSL at diagnosis, before chemotherapy with available fresh-frozen tissue, MRI and clinical follow-up

Description

Inclusion criteria At registration

  • Newly diagnosed primary cerebral lymphoma
  • Age ≥60 years
  • Pathology proven diagnosis or positive cytology of the CSF or vitreous
  • Karnofsky Performance Status ≥40
  • No evidence of systemic NHL (body CT scan, bone marrow biopsy)
  • Adequate haematological, renal and hepatic function
  • Calculated creatinine clearance > 40 ml/min

At randomization

  • Complete response on MRI after induction chemotherapy according to the IPCG criteria (Abrey et al, 2005)
  • Karnofsky Performance Status ≥40
  • Adequate haematological, renal and hepatic function

Exclusion criteria

  • Positive HIV serology
  • Preexisting immunodeficiency (organ transplant recipient)
  • Prior treatment for PCNSL
  • Isolated primary intra-ocular lymphoma
  • Low grade lymphoma
  • Any other active primary malignancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Retrospective
We will use DNA and RNA tumor samples. We will not use germline or blood DNA. These data will be combined with their magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at different times: at diagnosis, at the end of treatment and at the progression of the disease.
Prospective
We will use DNA and RNA tumor samples. We will not use germline or blood DNA. These data will be combined with their magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at different times: at diagnosis, at the end of treatment and at the progression of the disease.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival and progression-free survival modeling using MRI and NGS data in PCNSL patients.
Time Frame: 3 years

PCNSL characterization through the integration of radiomics, gene expression and genotyping features.

Mathematic modeling of morphological phenotypes and of prognosis and chemo-sensitivity or chemo-resistance of PCNSL using MRI and NGS data.

3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PCNSL progression modeling.
Time Frame: 3 years
Analysis chemo-resistance pathways and development of new therapeutic targets in PCNSL using integrative data: mouse model of PNCSL, in vitro data and radiomics analysis.
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Khê HOANG-XUAN, MD, PhD, Groupe Hospitalier La Pitié Salpêtrière - AP-HP

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 12, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 18, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL)

Clinical Trials on Tumor samples and MRI

3
Subscribe