Human Sperm Epigenetics in Embryonic Development. (EPI)

April 5, 2024 updated by: University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Identification and Characterization of Human Sperm Variation and Its Role in Embryonic Development.

A total of 60 men (40 with a history of infertility and treatment with assisted reproduction and 20 infertile controls achieving conception naturally) will be asked to provide at least one semen sample each for conventional semen analysis including measurement of DNA-fragmentation and semen preparation with swim-up. The prepared semen sample will then analyzed by comprehensive microscopy analyses aiming at identifying distinct subpopulations of spermatozoa based on chromatin density and composition, mitochondrial and acrosome function and epigenetic markers. In addition, spermatozoa samples of selected individuals will be subjected to comprehensive analyses of the chromatin and RNA expression status using epigenomic approaches.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hitherto male infertility has been defined by conventional semen analysis only, which mainly consists of determining concentration, progressive mobility and morphology of spermatozoa. However, the diagnostic accuracy of conventional semen analysis is poor and has very limited relationship with the outcome of assisted reproductive medicine. Preliminary data suggest that differences in chromatin density and epigenetic status of sperm may be more relevant, in particular with respect to the growth and differentiation of early embryos.

Chromatin density, morphology, mitochondrial status and epigenetic state in sperm of infertile men with disturbances of early embryo development in vitro will be compared with those of infertile men with normal embryo development and with fertile controls.

Primary outcome:

Features of chromatin density will be determined through staining of large numbers of spermatozoa. Differences in the staining results will be compared with known fertility outcome.

Secondary outcome:

Development of significant staining parameters towards the selection against sperm with reduced embryonic competence and/or in favor of sperm supporting embryonic development after assisted reproduction, thereby using flow cytometry and sorting (FACS) .

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Basel, Switzerland, 4031
        • University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

28 years to 39 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men with a history of infertility. Sperm concentration must be >15 millions per ml.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No vulnerable persons will be invited to participate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: good embryo development in assisted reproduction
20 infertile men treated with assisted reproduction with normal embryo development in vitro, as demonstrated in a previous treatment with assisted reproductive technology (defined by normal fertilization rate >50% and normal blastocyst development rate >50%).
Through staining of semen samples with sets of dyes to measure features of chromatin density, nuclear morphology and mitochondrial status in large numbers of single spermatozoa and to compare differences in the staining results with known fertility outcome. Through comprehensive comparative epigenetic studies we anticipate to explain different efficiencies of sperm from men with seemingly normal semen quality in driving embryonic development.
Other Names:
  • Semen analysis
Active Comparator: poor embryo development in assisted reproduction
20 infertile men treated with assisted reproduction with poor embryo development in vitro, as demonstrated in a previous treatment with assisted reproductive technology (defined by normal or slightly reduced fertilization rate <50% and low or absent blastocyst development (0 or only 1 blastocyst).
Through staining of semen samples with sets of dyes to measure features of chromatin density, nuclear morphology and mitochondrial status in large numbers of single spermatozoa and to compare differences in the staining results with known fertility outcome. Through comprehensive comparative epigenetic studies we anticipate to explain different efficiencies of sperm from men with seemingly normal semen quality in driving embryonic development.
Other Names:
  • Semen analysis
Placebo Comparator: natural conception
20 previously infertile men, normal history, normal genital status, normal sperm count, DNA fragmentation rate <20% (as given by TUNEL) and achieving pregnancy naturally (without medical intervention).
Through staining of semen samples with sets of dyes to measure features of chromatin density, nuclear morphology and mitochondrial status in large numbers of single spermatozoa and to compare differences in the staining results with known fertility outcome. Through comprehensive comparative epigenetic studies we anticipate to explain different efficiencies of sperm from men with seemingly normal semen quality in driving embryonic development.
Other Names:
  • Semen analysis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Differences in chromatin density.
Time Frame: 12 months
Staining of the nucleus of spermatozoa with the fluorescent dye chromomycin
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Normal and abnormal embryo development after assisted reproduction.
Time Frame: 24 months
Differences in distribution of epigenetic markers.
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christian De Geyter, MD, University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

February 29, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 27, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Male Infertility

Clinical Trials on Obtaining one or semen samples

Subscribe