Using the Roots of a Non Restorable Wisdom Tooth as a Block for Augmentation of Localized Defects (Clinical)

July 21, 2020 updated by: Doaa Adel Salah Khattab, Ain Shams University

The Effect of Autogenous Tooth Roots for Lateral Alveolar Ridge Augmentation and Staged Implant Placement (A Controlled Clinical Study With Histological Assessment)

assess and compare the efficacy and safety of autogenous tooth roots for lateral alveolar ridge augmentation with staged implant placement in comparison to autogenous bone block.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

A total of 14 patients in need of implant therapy and lateral ridge augmentation were allocated to parallel groups receiving either 1) healthy autogenous tooth roots (e.g. retained wisdom or impacted teeth or 2) cortical autogenous bone blocks harvested from the retromolar area. After 26 weeks of submerged healing the horizontal bone gain were assessed both clinically and radiographically. A core biopsy was taken during the implant placement to assess the histology of the newly formed bone.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

14

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Abbassia
      • Cairo, Abbassia, Egypt, 11566
        • Recruiting
        • Ain Shams University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Candidate for lateral ridge augmentation
  2. Insufficient bone ridge width at the recipient site for implant placement
  3. Sufficient bone height at the recipient site for implant placement
  4. Healthy oral mucosa, at least 3 mm keratinized tissue.
  5. Presence of wisdom teeth free from periapical infection.
  6. Missing maxillary or mandibular tooth with moderate horizontal defect (4-8) according to cologne classification

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1) Patients are systemically free according to Modified Cornell Medical Index 2) smokers patients. 3) Pregnant or lactating women.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Autogenous bone block
the monocortical block grafts were harvested from the retromolar region (i.e. linea oblique) by using of rotating (i.e. carbide burs)
autogenous bone block were used to increase the bone width
Experimental: Tooth block
In the first group, a second mucoperiosteal flap was elevated to surgically remove the respective wisdom tooth. After its removal and during the same surgery, the crown was decapitated at the cemento -enamel junction using a rotating carbide bur under gentle sterile saline cooling and the exposed pulp was preserved. The separated tooth root was adapted to match the size and shape of the defect area. To improve ankylosis between the graft and the defect site, the layer of cementum at the respective downward aspects of the root was carefully removed using a diamond bur until the underlying dentin was entirely exposed
tooth root blocks were used to increase the bone width

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Clinical and radiographic assessment of alveolar bone width following autogenous tooth roots augmentation.
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively
6 months postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Histological analysis of remodeled autogenous bone roots 4 months following horizontal ridge augmentation. Histological analysis of remodeled autogenous bone roots 4 months following horizontal ridge augmentation.
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively
6 months postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 6, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 15, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 121734

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Augmentation

Clinical Trials on autogenous bone block

Subscribe