Vibration Enhances Diabetic ULCER Healing (VIBEDULCER)

July 26, 2021 updated by: Samuel KK Ling, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Enhancement of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing Using Low-Magnitude High-Frequency Vibration Treatment - A Randomised Controlled Trial

Objectives:

Diabetes has a prevalence of 11.6% in China with diabetic foot ulcerations affecting over 30 million Chinese. 85% of these patients require amputation and 5-year mortality for diabetics is 70% when associated foot ulcers.

Clinical trials have shown that standing on whole-body vibration platforms, specifically low-magnitude high-frequency vibration (LMHFV); promotes angiogenesis, enhances muscle bulk and accelerates epithelization. Investigation on diabetic rats with foot wounds found accelerated wound healing, increased perfusion and upregulation of factors such as VEGF, PECAM-1 and PCNA.

Hypothesis:

The investigators postulate LMHFV will enhance diabetic foot ulcer healing.

Design and Subjects:

Prospective, single-centre, randomised control trial to treat 106 subjects with diabetic foot ulcers.

Interventions:

The intervention group will stand on LMHFV whole-body vibration platforms for 20min on alternate days for 20 weeks, together with conventional dressing by a trained wound-care nurse as in the control group.

Main Outcome Measures:

Ulcer size will be measured at multiple time points, the incidence of amputations/infections will be recorded, perfusion via ankle-brachial pressure index will be calculated and foot function via the foot and ankle outcome score will be analysed.

Data analysis:

Repeated measure of ANOVA to analyze time-point differences and student's t-test for same time-point comparison.

Expected Results:

This is the first clinical trial to investigate the effect of whole-body vibration on diabetic foot ulcers. It will show the investigators if the results from animal studies will translate into clinically significant results. If positive effects are established, whole-body vibration can be a valuable treatment regime to tackle diabetic foot ulcers.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Plan of Investigation: (fig 04 in supplementary notes, CONSORT diagram)

Subjects:

Participants will be recruited from the patients in the Orthopaedic & Traumatology department at the Prince of Wales Hospital, the tertiary teaching hospital affiliated to CUHK.

Sample size: 106 subjects randomized 1:1 into the two treatment groups accounting for a dropout rate of 15%.

The sample size was calculated by using the primary endpoint of wound size in G*Power 3.1.9.4 (Germany). Using a 1:1 randomization ratio a type I error rate (a-level) of 0.05 and power of 0.95. Our vibration study of diabetic rat wounds showed an effect size d of 0.99. We estimate a tuned-down effect in human subjects, thus using an effect size of 0.7 we calculated that we should recruit 90 participants with 45 in each group. (22)

Methods:

Study Design:

Randomized Controlled Trial 1:1 randomization into control n=58 or intervention (Vibration) group n=58. Intervention

  • Control group: conventional dressing
  • Vibration group: conventional dressing + LMHFV

Data Analysis:

Randomisation performed using computer-generated randomization with a 1:1 allocation ratio using permuted block randomization to ensure similar numbers in the control and vibration group.

Compliance to intervention:

Conventional dressing: Each attendance to wound dressing will be recorded by the clinic nurse; those with <60% attendance to the wound clinic will be excluded.

LMHFV Vibration: each participant in the vibration intervention group will be assigned a personal 'smart card'. This smart card will record each utilization of the vibration platform to ensure compliance, those with <66% attendance will be excluded.

Repeated measures of ANOVA will be used to analyze the ulcer size groups and time points differences with be analyzed with post-hoc Bonferroni tests. Student's t-test for two independent samples will be used to compare groups of the same time point. Statistical analyses will be performed using IBM SPSS 25 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA), and statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

106

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • >18 years old (legally able to self-sign consent)
  • Able to stand independently
  • Biochemically confirmed Diabetes with a fasting plasma glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/L, or a random plasma glucose ≥ 11.1 mmol/L or hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level ≥ 6.5%
  • Ulcers will be below the level of the malleoli, excluding those confined to the interdigital web space
  • Cross-sectional area of the index ulcer should be 50- 1000 mm2
  • Wagner stage 2-3
  • Not active infection according to the Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines

Exclusion criteria:

  • Severe cognitive impairment or severe comorbidity, which may impair ability to adhere to intervention plan, e.g. severe dementia, poor cardiopulmonary reserve requiring home oxygen, daily hemodialysis etc.
  • Evidence of active infection
  • Recent revascularization procedure (<12 weeks)
  • Recently received medication/intervention which might affect cell proliferation (eg chemotherapy, radiotherapy etc)
  • Allergy to dressing, adhesives or antibiotics
  • Incapable to understand the study protocol or provide written informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group: conventional dressing
Alternate day dressing in a designated clinic by a trained nurse specialized in wound care Dressing by a specialized wound-nurse is the current gold-stand of treatment for diabetic ulcers.
Alternate Day Dressing
Experimental: Vibration group: conventional dressing and LMHFV
Alternate day dressing in a designated clinic by a trained nurse specialized in wound care Alternate dat 20-week course of whole-body vibration therapy Alternate day 20min sessions on a self-designed vibration platform with low-magnitude high-frequency vibration (35Hz, 0.3g peak-to-peak displacement <0.1mm). Since the participants will return for dressing change on alternate days, the vibration group will also undergo the LMHFV on the same attendance.
with low-magnitude high-frequency vibration (35Hz, 0.3g peak-to-peak displacement <0.1mm)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ulcer size
Time Frame: 0weeks, 2weeks, 8weeks, 14weeks, 20weeks, 56weeks
• The baseline ulcer size will be measured at 0 weeks and a core interim measurement will be conducted at 20 weeks since 30% of ulcerations will heal at 20 weeks using conventional dressing. (13) A 1-year reassessment will help differentiate if the 20-week course of LMHFV therapy has created sustainable changes.
0weeks, 2weeks, 8weeks, 14weeks, 20weeks, 56weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time (days) to healing
Time Frame: up to 56 weeks
• The day of complete wound closure will be documented during their alternate day dressings in the designated clinic. The participant will still be reviewed at 20 weeks and 1 year for the primary outcome.
up to 56 weeks
Incidence of amputation
Time Frame: up to 56 weeks
• The reason and day of below knee/above knee amputation will be recorded. Details will be retrieved from the Clinical Management System, the centralized electronic healthcare system utilized by public hospitals in Hong Kong.
up to 56 weeks
Incidence of secondary infection
Time Frame: up to 56 weeks
• The number of hospitalized days and number of days of systemic antibiotic therapy will be documented. Details will be retrieved from the Clinical Management System, the centralized electronic healthcare system utilized by public hospitals in Hong Kong.
up to 56 weeks
Perfusion
Time Frame: 0weeks, 20weeks
• The measurement of the ABI will be standardized. (24) The subject will be at rest in supine position for 10mins, Doppler ultrasound to measure systolic blood pressure twice in the posterior tibial artery (If there is no obtainable signal in the posterior tibial artery, the dorsalis pedis will be used.), the average systolic blood pressure in the posterior tibial artery/dorsalis pedis divided by the higher of the SBP in the two arms will be used to calculate the ABI. (The higher SBP of the arm will be used in these calculations due to previous studies showing a strong association between peripheral arterial disease and subclavian stenosis)
0weeks, 20weeks
Foot function
Time Frame: 0weeks, 20weeks
• Foot function will be measured using the FAOS which is a variant of the KOOS specific for problems related to the foot and ankle region. The FAOS also has validated translations in English and Chinese; it is a questionnaire consisting of 5 Likert score subscales; Pain, Symptoms, ADL, Recreation and Foot related QOL. Answers are graded a score from 0-4 and a normalised score can be calculated for each subscale (100 is asymptomatic while 0 indicates extreme symptoms).
0weeks, 20weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Samuel KK Ling, MBChB, CUHK

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 30, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Foot Ulcer

Clinical Trials on Conventional Dressing

Subscribe