Ablation Versus Medical Management of Atrial Fibrillation in HFpEF (AMPERE)

March 24, 2026 updated by: Inova Health Care Services

Ablation Versus Medical Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection fRaction and the Effects on Exercise Capacity (AMPERE)

This is a prospective non-blinded randomized control pilot study comparing the effect of pulmonary vein isolation against medical management of atrial fibrillation in patients with Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Recent studies using PVI for rhythm control in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have shown improvement in systolic ejection fraction, exercise capacity, quality of life, and a significant reduction in all-cause mortality. The PVI procedure has been shown to be safe and comparably effective in treating Atrial Fibrillation (AF) in HFpEF patients, but no studies have yet demonstrated the effects of catheter ablation on exercise capacity or clinical outcomes.

The investigators propose a prospective, non-blinded randomized control pilot study to assess the feasibility of conducting larger scale studies to determine if there are differences between catheter ablation with medical management on exercise capacity and quality of life in HFpEF patients with AF. The investigators' study will be powered for AF burden reduction, and the investigators hope to use the effect size on exercise capacity and heart failure events to help determine power for larger clinical studies that will follow to shed light on how invasive management of atrial fibrillation may impact the natural history of individuals with these two cardiovascular conditions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

13

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Virginia
      • Fairfax, Virginia, United States, 22031
        • Inova Heart and Vascular Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • between 18 to 90 years of age, male or female
  • Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) > 50% by echocardiogram during routine screening or within 12 months prior to enrollment day.
  • Symptoms of heart failure requiring treatment with diuretic therapy for at least 30 days preceding enrollment.
  • Symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation.
  • Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation defined as recurrent AF (at least 2 episodes) that terminated spontaneously within 7 days
  • Persistent AF was defined as AF which is sustained beyond 7 days, or lasting less than 7 days but necessitating pharmacologic or electrical cardioversion
  • Included within the category of persistent AF is "long-standing persistent AF" defined as continuous AF of greater than 1 year in duration
  • AF episodes had to be documented in the last 3 months prior to enrollment by ECG, Holter monitor, Loop recorder, memory of the implanted device, or any suitable device.
  • Current symptoms of heart failure (NYHA II-IV) at the enrollment visit (Visit 1)
  • Structural heart disease evidenced by one or both of the following echocardiographic findings (done during the transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) within 6 months of enrollment)
  • Left atrial enlargement (LAE) defined as LA width > 3.8 cm or LA length > 5.0 cm, or LA area > 20 cm2 or LA volume > 55 mL or LA volume index > 29 ml/m2. (of note, LA length greater than 6.0 cm will be excluded)
  • Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) defined by septal thickness or posterior wall thickness > 1.0 cm
  • And at least one of the following:
  • A heart failure hospitalization lasting over 12 hours and including intravenous diuretics at a healthcare facility within 12 months prior to the enrollment visit.
  • An elevated pro-brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) (>100 pg/mL, or N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)>300 pg/mL)
  • Hemodynamic testing consistent with HFpEF physiology including pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) (or LVEDP) ≥ 15 mmHg.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous left heart ablation procedure for AF
  • Contraindication to chronic anticoagulation therapy or heparin
  • Longstanding atrial fibrillation, defined here as greater than 3 years of persistent atrial fibrillation
  • Severe left atrial dilatation, with LA length > 6.0 cm, optimally from parasternal long view
  • Acute coronary syndrome within 4 weeks as defined by electrocardiographic (ECG) ST segment depression or prominent T-wave inversion and/or positive biomarkers of necrosis (e.g. troponin) in the absence of ST-segment elevation and in an appropriate clinical setting (chest discomfort or angina equivalent).
  • Cardiac surgery, angioplasty, or cerebrovascular accident within 4 weeks prior to enrollment.
  • Planned cardiovascular intervention
  • Listed for heart transplant
  • Cardiac assist device implanted or need for mechanical hemodynamic support or inpatient admission
  • Life expectancy less than 1 year
  • Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as resting systolic blood pressure >190 and/or resting diastolic pressure>110
  • Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) stage 4-5 (GFR<25 ml/min/1.73m2), or on hemodialysis
  • Cardiac diagnosis in addition to or other than HFpEF:
  • Active myocarditis
  • Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
  • Severe valvular disease
  • Restrictive or constrictive cardiomyopathy, including known amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, hemochromatosis
  • Complex congenital heart disease
  • Constrictive pericarditis
  • Severe pulmonary hypertension (RVSP > 60 mmHg), not secondary to HFpEF
  • Non-cardiac pulmonary edema
  • Clinical evidence of digoxin toxicity
  • Sepsis
  • Inability to comply with planned study procedures
  • Pregnancy or nursing mothers
  • Uncontrolled hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism
  • BMI of >65 kg/m2

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) Group
Subjects randomized to this treatment arm will undergo atrial fibrillation ablation, and undergo routine post-procedural follow-up.
The intervention will involve standard of care electrophysiology ablation for rhythm management of atrial fibrillation with a procedure called a pulmonary vein isolation.
Other Names:
  • Atrial fibrillation ablation
No Intervention: Medical Management
Subjects randomized to this treatment arm will undergo medical management of the arrhythmia, but will not undergo invasive electrophysiologic procedures to address subject's AF.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in AF burden as assessed by difference in percentage of time an individual is in AF
Time Frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from intervention
AF burden, described as the percentage of time an individual is in AF relative to the total amount of time analyzed. This outcome will be assessed at multiple intervals following intervention arm, using a continuous, implantable heart rhythm monitor. The investigators' focus will be on the change between pre-intervention AF burden and AF burden at 6 month follow-up.
3, 6, 9, and 12 months from intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: 12 months
All deaths within 12 months of the intervention arm.
12 months
Number of cardiovascular mortalities
Time Frame: 12 months
The number of deaths attributable to cardiovascular causes occurring within 12 months of the intervention arm
12 months
Number of all-cause hospitalizations
Time Frame: 12 months
The total number of inpatient hospitalizations within 12 months following the intervention.
12 months
Number of heart failure hospitalizations
Time Frame: 12 months
The total number of inpatient hospitalizations attributable to heart failure exacerbations within 12 months following the intervention.
12 months
Change in patient-reported quality of life as assessed by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire
Time Frame: At enrollment (baseline) and 6 months following intervention
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. A change of 10 points or more is considered not only clinically significant but also carries prognostic implications for event-free survival in heart failure patients.
At enrollment (baseline) and 6 months following intervention
Change in NT pro-BNP levels
Time Frame: At enrollment (baseline) and 6 months following intervention
Serum biomarker associated with congestive heart failure symptoms, measured in (mg/ml).
At enrollment (baseline) and 6 months following intervention
Change in exercise capacity as assessed by the 6 minute walk distance test
Time Frame: At baseline and 6 months post intervention
Pre-intervention arm and 6 month post-procedural exercise capacity will be assessed using change in 6 minute walk distance, defined as the total distance (in meters) traversed during 6 minutes of time. This is well-validated measure of functional capacity and prognostic marker in patients with heart failure.
At baseline and 6 months post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Brett Atwater, MD, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Eunice Yang, MD PhD, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 26, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

February 26, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 25, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Subscribe