Reducing Stigma Among Healthcare Providers (RESHAPE-cRCT) (RESHAPE-cRCT)

February 22, 2024 updated by: Brandon A Kohrt, MD, PhD, George Washington University

Reducing Stigma Among Healthcare Providers to Improve Mental Health Services: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (RESHAPE-cRCT)

A growing number of trials have demonstrated treatment effectiveness for mental illness by non-specialist providers, such as primary care providers, in low-resource settings. A barrier to scaling up these evidence-based practices is the limited uptake from trainings into service provision and lack of fidelity to evidence-based practices among non-specialists. This arises, in part, from stigma among non-specialists against people with mental illness. Therefore, interventions are needed to address attitudes among non- specialists. To address this gap, REducing Stigma among HeAlthcare Providers to improvE Mental Health services (RESHAPE), is an intervention for non-specialists in which social contact with persons with mental illness is added to training and supervision programs. A cluster randomized control trial will address primary objectives including changes in stigma (Social Distance Scale) and improved quality of mental health services, operationalized as accuracy of identifying patients with mental illness in primary care. The control condition is existing mental health training and supervision for non-specialists delivered through the Nepal Ministry of Health's adaptation of the World Health Organization mental health Gap Action Programme. The intervention condition will incorporate social contact with people with mental illness into existing training and supervision. Participants in the cluster randomized control trial will be the direct beneficiaries of training and supervision (primary care providers) and indirect beneficiaries (their patients). Primary care workers' outcomes include stigma (Social Distance Scale), knowledge (mental health Gap Action Programme knowledge scale), implicit attitudes (Implicit Association Test), clinical self-efficacy (mental health Gap Action Programme knowledge scale), and clinical competence (Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors) to be assessed pre-training, post-training, and at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Accuracy of diagnoses will be determined through the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual version 5, which will be assessed at 3 months after patient enrollment. Patient outcomes include functioning, quality of life, psychiatric symptoms, medication side effects, barriers to care, and cost of care assessed at enrollment and 3 and 6 months. This study will inform decisions regarding inclusion of persons living with mental illness in training primary care providers.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There continues to be a major gap between the global burden of persons with mental illness and the number of patients receiving adequate treatment. In the U.S. and other high-income countries, approximately 1 out of 5 persons receives minimally adequate care. In lower-middle income countries, it ranges from 1 out of 27 to 1 out of 100 persons. To address this gap in low- and middle-income countries, a key strategy has been the use of primary care health workers to detect and deliver of care for mental illness. The World Health Organization has developed the mental health Gap Action Programme to train primary care workers to detect mental illness and deliver evidence-supported treatment. However, research to date suggests that implementation strategies for mental health Gap Action Programme are inadequate as evidenced by low detection rates. In Nepal, fewer than half of persons with mental illness were correctly identified by mental health Gap Action Programme-trained primary care workers. A potential barrier to effective implementation of primary care detection is stigma among primary care workers against persons with mental illness.

Our preliminary work suggests that reducing primary care workers' stigma against persons with mental illness may improve accurate detection of mental illness. A version of the mental health Gap Action Programme training that includes a stigma reduction component was developed: REducing Stigma among HealthcAre ProvidErs (RESHAPE). In RESHAPE, persons with mental illness (i.e., service users) are trained to share recovery stories, conduct myth-busting sessions, and promote mental health advocacy. A pilot cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted in Nepal comparing standard mental health Gap Action Programme training delivered psychiatrists and psychosocial specialists with a mental health Gap Action Programme training delivered by both specialists and service users (RESHAPE). Consistent with high-income country literature demonstrating that interaction with service users reduces stigma more effectively that only providing knowledge, stigma was lower among the RESHAPE- arm trained health workers. The pilot results also suggest that reducing stigma may improve detection of mental illness. Therefore, involvement of mental health service users in training primary care workers may reduce stigma, and that stigma reduction may mediate improved detection of mental illness. If these findings are confirmed in an appropriately powered cluster randomized controlled trial, this service user collaborative implementation strategy could make a major contribution to improving primary care detection in low- and middle-income countries, as well as in the U.S. A hybrid implementation-effectiveness (type-3) cluster randomized controlled trial will be in Nepal comparing mental health Gap Action Programme standard implementation with the RESHAPE implementation strategy. Our team of U.S. and Nepali researchers, in partnership with the Nepal Ministry of Health, demonstrated the feasibility of the cluster randomized controlled trial design and identified strategies for cost effectiveness modeling. Target conditions will be depressive disorder, psychotic disorders, and alcohol use disorder.

Aim 1 - To evaluate the impact of the RESHAPE service user engagement on stigma among primary care workers. Hypothesis: Primary care workers in the RESHAPE arm will have less stigma toward persons with mental illness (measured with the Social Distance Scale) 3 months after training compared with primary care workers in the standard training.

Aim 2 - To evaluate the impact of the RESHAPE training on accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of detection, as measured by the proportion of true positive and true negative diagnoses among patients presenting to primary care facilities, as confirmed by a psychiatrist's structured clinical interview; and to evaluate stigma as a mediator of differences in accuracy. Hypothesis: Primary care workers in the RESHAPE arm will have greater accuracy of detecting mental illness. Secondary analyses: implementation arm differences in patient quality adjusted life years and cost utility will be evaluated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Brandon Kohrt, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: 2027412896
  • Email: bkohrt@gwu.edu

Study Locations

    • Province 4
      • Pokhara, Province 4, Nepal
        • Recruiting
        • Transcultural Psychosocial Organization Nepal
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

**Primary Care Providers**

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All health workers from the facilities included in the study will be invited to participate
  • Health workers will be between 21 and 65 years of age based on employment criteria
  • within the government health system.
  • All participants will need to have Nepali language competency,
  • be actively engaged in care provision in their health cluster,
  • have a valid certificate of practice from the Ministry of Health
  • Health workers will need to have permission from their health supervisor to attend the entire duration of the training,

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any prior citations on their clinical practice licensure or any other government credentialing violations.

**Patients**

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients (with non-emergency medical needs) presenting to the primary care
  • any of the following groups:
  • (a) any mental illness diagnosis including depression, psychosis (bipolar disorder with a manic episode, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder with psychotic features, and alcohol use disorder with psychosis) and alcohol use disorder; plus the other conditions included in Nepal's mental health Gap Action Programme: anxiety, conversion, epilepsy, dementia, child and adolescent, other substance abuse (these patients are included because misdiagnosis is common with regard to missing or overdiagnosing one condition in place of another mental illness); comorbid conditions are also acceptable;
  • (b) any patients screening above cut-off scores on the tools; and
  • (c) 10% of patients who are negative on all of the above criteria.
  • any patients previously treated for mental illness would be included
  • age range will be 16 years or older, with no upper age limit (mental health Gap Action Programme training covers child and adolescent through mental illnesses affecting elderly population).
  • all participants will be able to speak Nepali
  • able to complete the research interview with the research assistants who will read all of the assessment tools.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with immediate medical needs requiring referral and emergency services (e.g., serious injury; pre-eclampsia; dehydration; status epilepticus)
  • patients needing acute psychiatric services (e.g., suicide attempts, alcohol withdrawal, psychosis/mania that cannot be managed in a community setting) who are referred for immediate hospitalization
  • Patients under the age of 16 years old will be excluded

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Implementation as Usual
Primary care providers will be trained in the 7-day curriculum of the mental health Gap Action Programme adapted by the Nepal Ministry of Health.
The mental health Gap Action Programme is a training program for primary care providers in mental health services. The curriculum has been developed by the World Health Organization and was adapted in Nepal and certified by the Ministry of Health.
Experimental: RESHAPE
Primary care providers will be trained in the 7-day curriculum of the mental health Gap Action Programme, plus they will have co-facilitation by mental health service users providing recovery testimonials as well as aspirational figures presenting testimonies and conducting myth-busting sessions.
The mental health Gap Action Programme is a training program for primary care providers in mental health services. The curriculum has been developed by the World Health Organization and was adapted in Nepal and certified by the Ministry of Health.
Mental health service users are trained using Photo Voice to develop recovery story testimonials. They then participate in primary care providers mental health Gap Action Programme training. In addition, aspirational figures are trained to provider testimonials and conduct myth-busting.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Social Distance Scale (SDS)
Time Frame: 6 months post training
12-item scale of willingness to interact with persons with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 72, higher score is worse outcome
6 months post training
Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual 5 (SCID-5)
Time Frame: 3-months post-patient enrollment
Accuracy of clinical decision making (this a diagnostic tool, there are no maximum or minimum scores, the objective is to determine if an appropriate diagnosis is selected that will lead to appropriate management)
3-months post-patient enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
mental health Gap Action Programme knowledge test
Time Frame: 6 months post-training
Multiple-choice assessment from mental health Gap Action Programme training materials; minimum = 0, maximum = 100, higher is better outcome
6 months post-training
mental health Gap Action Programme knowledge test
Time Frame: 3 months post-training
Multiple-choice assessment from mental health Gap Action Programme training materials, minimum = 0, maximum = 100, higher is better outcome
3 months post-training
mental health Gap Action Programme knowledge test
Time Frame: immediately after the training
Multiple-choice assessment from mental health Gap Action Programme training materials, minimum = 0, maximum = 100, higher is better outcome
immediately after the training
mental health Gap Action Programme self-efficacy assessment
Time Frame: 6-months post-training
Self-reported clinical efficacy for mental health services, minimum = 0; maximum = 5, higher score is better outcome
6-months post-training
mental health Gap Action Programme self-efficacy assessment
Time Frame: 3-months post-training
Self-reported clinical efficacy for mental health services, minimum = 0; maximum = 5, higher score is better outcome
3-months post-training
mental health Gap Action Programme self-efficacy assessment
Time Frame: immediately after the training
Self-reported clinical efficacy for mental health services, minimum = 0; maximum = 5, higher score is better outcome
immediately after the training
Implicit Association Test
Time Frame: 6-months post-training
Computer-based neuropsychological assessment of implicit bias related to mental illness, there is no maximum or minimum score, score is D-score based on comparison of timing; positive scores equal more bias
6-months post-training
Implicit Association Test
Time Frame: 3-months post-training
Computer-based neuropsychological assessment of implicit bias related to mental illness, there is no maximum or minimum score, score is D-score based on comparison of timing; positive scores equal more bias
3-months post-training
Implicit Association Test
Time Frame: immediately after the training
Computer-based neuropsychological assessment of implicit bias related to mental illness, there is no maximum or minimum score, score is D-score based on comparison of timing; positive scores equal more bias
immediately after the training
Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors
Time Frame: 6 months post-training
Observed structured clinical evaluation using a standardized role play, minimum score = 0, maximum = 100, higher scores are better
6 months post-training
Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors
Time Frame: 3 months post-training
Observed structured clinical evaluation using a standardized role play, minimum score = 0, maximum = 100, higher scores are better
3 months post-training
Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors
Time Frame: immediately after the training
Observed structured clinical evaluation using a standardized role play, minimum score = 0, maximum = 100, higher scores are better
immediately after the training
Social Distance Scale
Time Frame: 3 months post training
12-item scale of willingness to interact with persons with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 72, higher score is worse outcome
3 months post training
Social Distance Scale
Time Frame: immediately after the training
12-item scale of willingness to interact with persons with mental illness, minimum = 0, maximum = 72, higher score is worse outcome
immediately after the training
Patient: World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale
Time Frame: 6-months post enrollment
Assessment of daily functioning, minimum = 12, maximum = 60; higher score is worse
6-months post enrollment
Patient: World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale
Time Frame: 3-months post enrollment
Assessment of daily functioning, minimum = 12, maximum = 60; higher score is worse
3-months post enrollment
Patient Health Questionnaire 9
Time Frame: 6-months post enrollment
Depression symptoms, minimum = 0, maximum = 27, higher score is worse
6-months post enrollment
Patient Health Questionnaire 9
Time Frame: 3-months post enrollment
Depression symptoms, minimum = 0, maximum = 27, higher score is worse
3-months post enrollment
Patient: Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7
Time Frame: 6 months post enrollment
Anxiety symptoms, minimum = 0, maximum = 21, higher score is worse
6 months post enrollment
Patient: Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7
Time Frame: 3 months post enrollment
Anxiety symptoms, minimum = 0, maximum = 21, higher score is worse
3 months post enrollment
Patient: Positive and Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia
Time Frame: 6 months post enrollment
Psychosis symptoms, minimum = 0, maximum = 56, higher score is worse
6 months post enrollment
Patient: Positive and Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia
Time Frame: 3 months post enrollment
Psychosis symptoms, minimum = 0, maximum = 56, higher score is worse
3 months post enrollment
Patient: Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test
Time Frame: 6-months post enrollment
Alcohol Use Disorder symptoms, minimum = 0, maximum = 40, higher score is worse
6-months post enrollment
Patient: Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test
Time Frame: 3-months post enrollment
Alcohol Use Disorder symptoms, minimum = 0, maximum = 40, higher score is worse
3-months post enrollment
Patient: Euroqol 5 dimension 5 level
Time Frame: 6-months post enrollment
Quality of life symptoms, minimum = 5, maximum=25, higher score is worse
6-months post enrollment
Patient: Euroqol 5 dimension 5 level
Time Frame: 3-months post enrollment
Quality of life symptoms, minimum = 5, maximum=25, higher score is worse
3-months post enrollment
Patient: Cost of Service Receipt Inventory
Time Frame: 6-months post-enrollment
Costs of care to patients, there is no maximum or minimum score, the outcome is total costs
6-months post-enrollment
Patient: Cost of Service Receipt Inventory
Time Frame: 3-months post-enrollment
Costs of care to patients, , there is no maximum or minimum score, the outcome is total costs
3-months post-enrollment
Patient: Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors
Time Frame: 6-months post-enrollment
Common factors use by primary care provider, minimum score = 0, maximum = 15, higher score is better
6-months post-enrollment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Abnormal involuntary movement scale
Time Frame: 3-months post-treatment initiation
Abnormal movements associated with antipsychotic medication, minimum score = 0, maximum score = 40, higher score is worse
3-months post-treatment initiation
Antidepressant side-effect checklist
Time Frame: 3-months post-treatment initiation
Side effects of antidepressant medication, minimum score = 0, maximum score = 63, higher score is worse
3-months post-treatment initiation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brandon A Kohrt, MD, PhD, George Washington University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 22, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 25, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Information will be shared through National Institute of Mental Health Data Archives

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will become available after publication of the primary and secondary outcomes manuscripts

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Managed through the National Institute of Mental Health Data Archives

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trials on mental health Gap Action Programme

3
Subscribe