Normative Values of the Berg Balance Scale and Timed Up and Go Test

March 29, 2021 updated by: Riphah International University

Normative Values of the Berg Balance Scale and Timed Up and Go Test in Elderly Females

Falls are a significant public health concern for older adults; early identification of people at high risk for falling facilitates the provision of rehabilitation treatment to reduce future fall risk. Berg balance scale is a reliable, valid and widely used tool to measure balance. Normal values of BBS declines with increasing age above 70 at a rate of 0.75 points per year. Timed up and go test Assess mobility, balance, falls risk. Normative data on both these test for our population is not established. Therefore this study aimed at finding normal scores of both these in our community-dwelling elderly females. For this purpose, data will be calculated from community-dwelling elderly females. BBS and TUG would be performed on each subject meeting our inclusion criteria after their consent. Data will be recorded and analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23. We will find the mean and standard deviation. Thus this study will provide normal reference values of BBS and TUG in our community

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Balance deficits in elderly adults can arise from the process of ageing, such as age-related changes associated with the sensory system (vestibular, visual, somatosensory) or diseases such as cerebrovascular accident, arthritis, peripheral neuropathies, or disuse due to immobility. Balance is maintained when all the forces acting on the body are balanced so that one's centre of gravity is controlled within the base of support in static postures, during movement, and when responding to external disturbances. Normative data are important when interpreting any balance tool. the knowledge that a person or group of people Have worse balance than a healthy person of the same age may assist the identification and effective management of balance problem.

The BBS is a performance-based measure consisting of 14 items and a maximum score of 56. Originally developed to assess balance in older adults, it was subsequently adopted as a falls-risk prediction tool for older adults (although studies have differed in the recommended cut off score for falls risk. The BBS consists of 14 functional tasks of increasing difficulty, each scored from 0 to 4 (0¼unable to perform the task; 4¼task performed independently). The maximum score of 56 indicates no identifiable balance difficulties.

The 'timed up and go' test (TUG) is a simple, quick and widely used clinical performance-based measure of lower extremity function, mobility and fall risk. The TUG has been studied in elderly populations Women) the test procedure for the TUG is relatively simple. Subjects are asked to stand up from a standard chair (seat height between 44 and 47 cm), walk a distance of 3 m (marked on the floor) at a comfortable pace, turn, walk back and sit down. Subjects are permitted to use routine walking aids and are instructed not to use their arms to stand up. No physical assistance is given. The time to complete the task is measured with a stopwatch. Timing commences on the command 'go' and stops when the subject's back is positioned against the back of the chair after sitting down.

Use of local normative data of the specific population is recommended for more meaningful interpretation of TUG result Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify the normative data of TUG test and berg balance scale among community-dwelling older adults.the research was conducted in 2014 on normative scores on berg balance scale declines after age 70 in healthy community-dwelling people. it was a systematic review. purpose of this study was to find What is the mean Berg Balance Scale score of healthy elderly people living in the community and how does it vary with age? Group of healthy community-dwelling people with a mean age of 70 years or greater that has undergone assessment using the Berg Balance Scale were included. Mean and standard deviations of Berg Balance Scale scores within cohorts of elderly people of known mean age were measured. The mean Berg Balance Scale scores ranged from 37 to 55 out of a possible maximum score of 56. Although participants aged around 70 years had very close to normal Berg Balance Scale scores, there was a significant decline in balance with age at a rate of 0.7 points on the 56-point Berg Balance Scale per year. It was concluded that Healthy community-dwelling elderly people have modest balance deficits, as measured by the Berg Balance Scale, although balance scores deteriorate and become more variable with age.

the study was conducted on 'Timed Up and Go' test: Age, gender and cognitive impairment stratified normative values of older adults' in 2017. The aim of this study was to establish 'Timed up and Go' test (TUG) normative data among community-dwelling older adults stratified based on cognitive status, gender and age groups. A total of 2084 community-dwelling older adults from wave I and II were recruited through a multistage random sampling method. TUG was performed using the standard protocol and scores were then stratified based on with and without mild cognitive impairment (MCI), gender and in 5-year age groups ranging from ages of the '60s to '80s. 529(16%) participants were identified to have MCI. descriptive analysis showed, participants with MCI, women and older in age took a longer time to complete TUG, as compared to men with MCI across all age groups with exceptions for some age groups. These results suggested that MCI needs to be taken into consideration when testing older adults using TUG, besides age and gender factors.

a study on "Berg balance scale" and "timed up and go" Discriminates between fallers and non-fallers, in people with Multiple S. Different cut-offs have been used for BBS. With a cut-off at >44; high specificity (90%) but low sensitivity (40%) were found. Using ≤55 as cut-off yielded high sensitivity (94%) but low specificity (32%).TUG has not shown discriminant ability. The aim was to examine discriminant validity for BBS and TUG; fallers vs. non-fallers and predictive properties using previously suggested cut-offs. Data from three samples of PwMS (n=220) with imbalance was used. Testing was conducted by experienced research physiotherapists. Participants were classified as fallers or non-fallers. Mann-Whitney U test and ROC were used. BBS median for fallers was 45 points (n:108) and for non-fallers 50 points (n:99). TUG median was 17.5 seconds (n=108) for fallers and 13.2 seconds (n=99) for non-fallers.BBs: Using >44 points as cut-off correctly identified 51% of the fallers and 37% of the non-fallers. Using ≤55 correctly identified 96% fallers and 15% non-fallers.TUG: A cut-off (19.34 seconds) was chosen by maximizing the sum of sensitivity and specificity resulting in sensitivity at 70% and specificity at 43%.

Susan W Muir et al. conducted a study in 2008 on Use of the Berg Balance Scale for Predicting Multiple Falls in Community-Dwelling Elderly People. it was A Prospective Study. The objective of this study was to examine the predictive validity of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) for 3 types of outcomes-any fall (1 fall), multiple falls (2 falls), and injurious falls-by use of sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the curve, and likelihood ratios. A sample of 210 community-dwelling older adults received a comprehensive geriatric assessment at baseline, which included the BBS to measure balance. Data on prospective falls were collected monthly for a year. They concluded that the use of the BBS as a dichotomous scale to identify people at high risk for falling should be discouraged because it fails to identify the majority of such people. The predictive validity of this scale for multiple falls is superior to that for other types of falls.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

347

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Pakistan
    • Punjab
      • Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan, 54000
        • Riphah International University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

community-dwelling older adult females who are able to walk independently and can take self-care activities independently without any cognitive issues & any co-morbidity.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Community-dwelling older adults aged 60-80 years
  • only females
  • Tolerance of balance and gait tasks without fatigue
  • Able to walk independently Get in or out of a chair with or without assistive device
  • Independent in self-care activities (eating, bathing, dressing)
  • Able to follow instructions in able to perform the test required in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Elderly individuals with a history of recurrent falls
  • Cognitive and neurological impairments
  • History of transitory ischemic attack
  • stroke Participants on a wheelchair

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Other

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Berg balance scale
Time Frame: day 1
Berg balance scale (BBS) is used for assessment of balance and fall risk, Higher scores on the BBS indicate greater independence and better ability to balance. In contrast, lower scores indicate a greater fall risk Items DESCRIPTION SCORE (0-4) Sitting to standing _____ Standing unsupported _____ Sitting unsupported _____ Standing to sitting _____ Transfers _____ Standing with eyes closed _____ Standing with feet together _____ Reaching forward with outstretched arm _____ Retrieving object from floor _____ Turning to look behind _____ Turning 360 degrees _____ Placing alternate foot on stool _____ Standing with one foot in front _____ Standing on one foot _____ TOTAL __/56
day 1
Timed up and go test
Time Frame: day 1

Timed up and go test is used for the assessment of falls risk among elderly population. The Timed "Up and Go" (TUG) Test measures, in seconds, the time taken by an individual to stand up from a standard arm chair (approximate seat height of 46 cm, arm height 65 cm), walk a distance of 3 meters (approximately 10 feet), turn, walk back to the chair, and sit down.

Normal healthy elderly usually complete the task in 10 seconds or less. Very frail or weak elderly with poor mobility may take 2 minutes or more.

Clinical guide: <10 seconds = normal <20 seconds = good mobility, can go out alone, mobile without a gait aid <30 seconds = problems, cannot go outside alone, requires a gait aid A score of more than or equal to 14 seconds has been shown to indicate high risk of falls.
day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Riphah International University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • REC/Lhr/20/2016 Amna Anwar

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Community Dwelling Older Adults

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Kuwait

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe