Unilateral Attachment Versus Tooth Implant Supported Bridge

March 6, 2020 updated by: Sharaf Mohamed Yahia, Cairo University

Attachment-retained Unilateral Partial Denture Versus Tooth Implant Supported Prosthesis in Mandibular Distal Extension Cases

Purpose: Evaluation of patients' satisfaction, biting force measurement and radiographic evaluation of abutment teeth of tooth implant supported bridge, unilateral attachment and conventional partial denture in mandibular distal extension cases.

Materials and methods: Twenty four patients were selected and divided into three equal groups, each of eight patients: patients of group I Patients received a fixed tooth implant supported bridge, patients of group II Patients received a removable unilateral attachment partial denture and group III Patients received a conventional removable partial denture.Evaluation included patient satisfaction and biting force measurement radiographic evaluation of terminal abutments.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Purpose: Evaluation of patients' satisfaction, biting force measurement and radiographic evaluation of abutment teeth of tooth implant supported bridge, unilateral attachment and conventional partial denture in mandibular distal extension cases.

Materials and methods: Twenty four patients were selected according to the following criteria: Patients with unilateral mandibular distal extension with last standing second premolar abutment, abutments showed sufficient occluso-gingival height and good periodontal condition. Patients were divided into three equal groups, each of eight patients: patients of group I Patients received a fixed tooth implant supported bridge, patients of group II Patients received a removable unilateral attachment partial denture and group III Patients received a conventional removable partial denture.Evaluation included patient satisfaction using "OHIP14" questionnaires and biting force measurement radiographic evaluation of terminal abutments.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11511
        • Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Unilateral mandibular distal extension area
  • The abutments showed sufficient occluso-gingival height of its clinical crown
  • Adequate inter-arch space and no tempro-mandibular joint disorders.
  • No para-functional habits,
  • Full opposing arch or restored with acceptable fixed restoration
  • Minimal bone height11 mm at the lower second molar area.

Exclusion Criteria:

*Insufficent bone height in posterior area of mandible

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: conventional group
conventional partial denture
conventional metalic partial denture
Other Names:
  • partial denture
EXPERIMENTAL: attachment group
unlateral attachment retained partial denture
unilateral attachment from rehine 83
EXPERIMENTAL: tooth implant supporeted prosthesis
tooth implant supported bridge
tooth implant supported bridge

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 month
questionnaires
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
biting force
Time Frame: 1 month
measuring the biting force of the patients by sensor
1 month
radiographic evaluation
Time Frame: 1 month
evaluation of alveolar bone loss
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: samira Ibrahim, prof, Professor of prosthodontics

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 20, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 10, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Edentulous Jaw

Clinical Trials on CONVENTIONAL

Subscribe