Efficacy and Safety of Allogenic Stem Cell Product(CARTISTEM®) for Osteochondral Lesion of Talus

November 27, 2022 updated by: Hyundai Bioland Co., Ltd.

A Multi-center, Single-blind, Randomized, Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Adding CARTISTEM® on Microfracture in Patients With Talar Chondral or Osteochondral Defect

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding CARTISTEM®(allogenic umbilical cord blood-derived stem cell product) on microfracture, a currently standard treatment for OLT, in patients with talar chondral or osteochondral defect.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

102

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Dongdaemun-gu
      • Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Korea, Republic of, 02447
        • KyungHee University Medical Center
    • Gangnam-gu
      • Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Korea, Republic of, 06351
        • Samsung Medical Center
      • Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Korea, Republic of, 06273
        • Gangnam Severance Hospital
    • Guro-gu
      • Seoul, Guro-gu, Korea, Republic of, 08308
        • Korea University Guro Hospital
    • Jung-gu
      • Daejeon, Jung-gu, Korea, Republic of, 35015
        • Chungnam National University Hospital
      • Incheon, Jung-gu, Korea, Republic of, 22332
        • Inha University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Talar chondral/osteochondral lesion confirmed by radiographical exam at screening or diagnosis, an AOFAS score of 75 or below
  2. Ankle joint pain/stiffness with no response to conservative treatment for more than 12 weeks
  3. Ankle joint cartilage injury of defect of ICRS grade Ⅳ in MRI
  4. Male or female aged more than 18
  5. A one-sided lesion
  6. Appropriate function of blood clot: PT(INR) < 1.5×ULN, aPTT <1.5×ULN
  7. Appropriate renal function: Creatinine ≤ 2.0 ㎎/㎗, Proteinuria ≤ trace
  8. Appropriate hepatic function: Total bilirubin ≤ 2.0 ㎎/㎗, AST/ALT ≤ 100 IU/L
  9. No evidence of auto-immune disorder: According to investigator's judgement based on relevent symtom and physical exam, anti-nuclear antibody and anti-thyroglobulin antibody tests are able to performed and confirmed negative (If positive, there are possible cases according to diagnostic opinion of medical department)
  10. No surgery or radiotherapy for the same ankle joint within 6 weeks
  11. Female patients agreeing with maintenance of contraception* during study period

    *hormone contraceptive, implants of intrauterine device or intrauterine system, double barrier contraception[Concurrent use of diaphragm or cervical occlusive cap and male condom], surgical sterilisation, etc.

  12. No chronic ligament instability more than grade Ⅲ (Grade 0: none, Grade Ⅰ: 1~5㎜, GradeⅡ: 5~10㎜, Grade Ⅲ: >10㎜)
  13. Patients agreeing with participation in this study and signed on informed consent by their own will

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Degenerative arthritis in ankle(Kellgren Lawrence Grade 3-4)
  2. Autoimmune disease
  3. Infectious disease need to administration of parenteral antibiotics
  4. Myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, other serious cardiac disorder or uncontrolled resistant hypertension
  5. Serious medical disease(Ex. Kidney disease such as chronic renal failure or Glomerulonephritis, etc., acute/chronic liver disease such as liver cirrhosis, fatty liver etc., medical history of malignancy*)

    *Complete remission status is possible.

  6. Pregnancy or breast-feeding
  7. Psychiatric history or epilepsy
  8. Alcohol abuse
  9. Heavy smoker
  10. Chronic inflammatory disease such as rheumatoid arthritis
  11. Participants other clinical trials within 4 weeks
  12. Administration of immunosuppressing agents such as Cyclosporin A or azathioprine within 6 weeks
  13. Patients with acute ligament injury and clinically significant chronic ligament instability
  14. Patients treated with surgery or cell therapy product for the same disease
  15. Patients with hypersensitivity or allergy history to bovine protein, hyaluronic acid and gentamicin
  16. Other inappropriate patients determined by the principal investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Microfracture + CARTISTEM®
CARTISTEM® is added on the lesion as a single dose of 500 ㎕/㎠ according to the defect size after arthroscopic curettage and microfracture.

*Stratified randomization by lesion size below 1.5㎠ or more than 1.5㎠

  1. Procedure: Microfracture
  2. Biological: CARTISTEM®(Human Umbilical Cord Blood-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell product)
Active Comparator: Microfracture
Standard treatment of arthroscopic curettage and microfracture is performed for cartilage defect.

*Stratified randomization by lesion size below 1.5㎠ or more than 1.5㎠

1. Procedure: Microfracture

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ICRS-Cartilage Repair Assessment Total Score
Time Frame: Week 48

Arthroscopic evaluation of articular cartilage repair

: The score range from 12(normal) to 1(severely abnormal) where lower scores indicate more severity of injury

Week 48

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ICRS-Cartilage Repair Assessment Overall Grade
Time Frame: Week 48
The grades range from 1(normal) to 4 (severely abnormal) where lower grades indicate more complete repair
Week 48
Improvement degree of Cartilage Repair by MRI
Time Frame: Week 0 and 48

Changes in MOCART(Magnetic resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) score

: MOCART score is a 9-part and 29-item scoring system, also resulting in a find cartilage repair tissue score between 0 and 100 points. 100 points represent the best imaginable score

Week 0 and 48
Degree of Functional improvement in FAOS(Foot & Ankle Outcome Score)
Time Frame: Week 0, 24 and 48
: FAOS consists in 42 items that cover 5 dimensions (symptoms, pain, activities of daily living, sport and recreation activities, and quality of life. Raw scores of each sub-scales results of the sum of each items. A normalized score (100 indicationg no symptoms and 0 indicating extreame sysmptoms) is calculated for each subscale
Week 0, 24 and 48
Degree of Functional improvement in AOFAS(The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Score)
Time Frame: Week 0, 24 and 48
: AOFAS consists in 9 items that can be divided into 3 sub-scales (pain, function and alignment). 100 points of 1 to 100 represent no symptoms or impairments
Week 0, 24 and 48
Degree of Functional improvement in Tegner activity score
Time Frame: Week 0, 24 and 48
: Tegner activity represents the highest level of activity on scale of 0 to 10 that you are able to participate in currently . The higher values represent a better outcome
Week 0, 24 and 48
Degree of Quality of Life improvement in SF-36(Short Form Health Survey-36)
Time Frame: Week 0, 24 and 48
: SF-36 comprises 36 items divided into two components of physical health and mental health. Higher scores between 0 and 100 represent better health status
Week 0, 24 and 48
Degree of pain improvement in 100 mm VAS(Visual Analogue Scale)
Time Frame: Week 0, 24 and 48
  • VAS represents higher scores mean higher pain
  • 0 mm (no pain) and 100 mm (worst pain)
Week 0, 24 and 48

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 3, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 13, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 13, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

IPD will not be shared to other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chondral or Osteochondral Lesion of Talus

Clinical Trials on CARTISTEM®

Subscribe