Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment With Percutaneous Injections of Autologous Bone Marrow Concentrate (Bone-Gun)

March 14, 2020 updated by: Istituto Clinico Humanitas

Pilot Study on the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis With Percutaneous Injections of Autologous Bone Marrow Concentrate at the Cartilage-bone Interface.

Recently there has been a growing interest in the role of subchondral bone in knee arthritis, both in its etiology and evolution and in its clinical significance. It has now been widely demonstrated that changes in the subchondral bone can develop both as a cause and as a consequence of joint degeneration and it is now accepted in the scientific community that the presence of these changes is of clinical importance, causing pain and an inflammatory state that can contribute to the evolution of arthrosis arthropathy. Recently the use of mesenchymal cells obtained from the bone marrow has been proposed for the treatment of gonarthrosis by intra-articular injections. Even more recently, treatments have been studied and proposed for the treatment of the bone-cartilage interface in knees affected by osteoarthrosis, using autologous bone marrow concentrate, with promising results.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic degenerative and disabling disease of joint joints, in which metabolic impairment between the synthesis and degradation of cartilage and subchondral bone, involves progressive destruction of joint tissue accompanied by chronic pain and synovial inflammation. Currently, available therapies are mostly palliative and designed to mask symptoms. The study proposed here has been constructed on the basis of the scientific evidence reported in the literature regarding the etiology and the treatment of OA. As recently demonstrated, the use of mesenchymal cells obtained from the bone marrow was effective in the treatment of gonarthrosis by intra-articular injections. Even more recently, treatments aimed at treating the bone-cartilage interface in arthritic knees have been studied and proposed. In the 2016 Val et al. pilot study, stem cells from the tibial bone marrow injected into the percutaneous bone-cartilage interface were described as a new therapeutic approach to osteoarthritis of the knee. This procedure is able to repair cartilage by stimulating subchondral bone angiogenesis and alleviating ischemia associated with arthritic knee pain, generating extremely positive outcomes in patients with low-grade osteoarthritis and relieving long-term pain in patients with high-grade osteoarthritis. This treatment is also able to induce differentiation and proliferation of chondrocytes, leading to an increase in the size of the intra-articular matrix, demonstrating an effective and minimally invasive treatment for the resolution of OA. The study described here aims to evaluate the potential effectiveness of the synergistic effect of both injections, with the aim of improving the symptomatic picture of patients with OA of the knee. Combining percutaneous injections at the bone-cartilage interface with intra-articular injections will provide proven results for the use of stem cells such as cartilage repair, increased vascularity, and pain reduction, in both compartments of the knee affected by OA. The positive effects reported in the literature regarding intra-articular injections will be combined with those reported with respect to the use of percutaneous injections at the cartilage, in order to obtain a better outcome in the treatment of the disease than in previous studies.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

25

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Milan
      • Rozzano, Milan, Italy, 20089
        • Recruiting
        • Humanitas Research Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Elizaveta Kon, MD
          • Phone Number: +390282247523

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

25 patients, meeting specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, will be enrolled. In general, the patients are characterized as patients with painful arthritis of the medial or lateral compartment, which have not achieved a reduction in pain in the presence of conservative treatments. The patients are enrolled on the basis of a paper questionnaire based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria: a patient can only be enrolled if he or she responds positively to all questions related to the inclusion criteria and negatively to all questions related to the exclusion criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female patients aged between 40 and 70;
  2. Medial or lateral arthrosis (grade 2-3 according to Kellgren-Lawrence score);
  3. Failure after at least 6 months of conservative treatment (patients not responding to drug therapy with NSAIDs and painkillers, no benefit from rehabilitation cycle in water or gym, no benefit after hyaluronic acid or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) infiltrations, or after at least one infiltration of corticosteroids);
  4. Ability and consent of patients to participate actively in the rehabilitation and clinical and radiological follow-up protocol;
  5. Signing of informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who are incapable of understanding and will;
  2. Trauma patients within 6 months prior to surgery;
  3. Patients with malignancies;
  4. Patients with rheumatic diseases;
  5. Patients with diabetes;
  6. Patients with metabolic thyroid disorders;
  7. Patients abusing alcoholic beverages, drugs or drugs;
  8. Patients with lower limb impairment above 10°
  9. Body Mass Index <18 or > 35;
  10. Patients undergoing knee surgery during the 12 months prior to surgery;
  11. Patients with pathology ascribable to patellofemoral pathology;
  12. Untreated knee instability.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement of subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC)
Time Frame: up to 24 months
The IKDC subjective knee Form consists of questions, divided into four sections: Symptoms, Functionality during daily activities and sports, Current knee function, Participation in work and sports. The patient will fill the subjective IKDC questionnaire.
up to 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
improvement according to the subscale Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain
Time Frame: up to 24 months
The KOOS score consists of 5 categories; Pain, Other symptoms, Functionality in daily activities, Functionality in sports and recreational activities, and Quality of life. The previous week shall be taken into account as a reference at the time of compilation. For each question, several answer options are provided within each category, corresponding to a score between 0-4 points; overall the score is between 100 and 0 (100 indicates absence of symptoms, 0 indicates total presence of symptoms). The patient will fill the KOOS questionnaire.
up to 24 months
improvement of the overall KOOS
Time Frame: up to 24 months
The KOOS score consists of 5 categories; Pain, Other symptoms, Functionality in daily activities, Functionality in sports and recreational activities, and Quality of life. The previous week shall be taken into account as a reference at the time of compilation. For each question, several answer options are provided within each category, corresponding to a score between 0-4 points; overall the score is between 100 and 0 (100 indicates absence of symptoms, 0 indicates total presence of symptoms). The patient will fill the KOOS questionnaire.
up to 24 months
improvement of the TEGNER score
Time Frame: up to 24 months
This score allows to estimate the level of motor activity of a subject with a score between 0 and 10 (0 represents 'incapacity' and 10 represents 'participation in competitive sports'). In the study the TEGNER Score will be compiled directly by the Investigator, through an interview to the patient.
up to 24 months
Improvement according to Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) MRI score
Time Frame: up to 24 months
The WORMS score is composed of seven voices that describe in the complex, the aspect of the joint, evaluating specifically the state of the cartilage with sequences T2-weighted FSE and FS-3D SPGR (taking into consideration thickness and signal) presence of subchondral cysts with suppressed fat sequences T2-weighted FSE, presence of subchondral edema with suppressed fat sequences T2-weighted FSE, joint profile (considering any flattening or depression of the articular surface compared to normal), the presence of osteophytes and their size, the state of the meniscus, both medial and lateral, the state of the synovia by distension of the synovial cavity. The radiologist will fill the WORMS score forms.
up to 24 months
Improvement according to Kellgren-Lawrence (K/L) score
Time Frame: up to 24 months
The score K/L grading scale allows to classify and differentiate the degree of severity of osteoarthritis of the damaged knee. The score includes grade I to grade IV (the higher the grade, the more severe the OA). The radiologist will fill K/L score forms.
up to 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Elizaveta Kon, MD, Istituto Clinico Humanitas

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 6, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on BioCue Concentration Kit

Subscribe