Testing of a Mobile Web App to Decrease Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms in Women After Sexual Assault

February 20, 2023 updated by: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Pilot Testing of a Mobile Web App to Mitigate Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms (PTSS) After Sexual Assault

Interventions are available to all adult women sexual assault survivors to reduce the risk of pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection, yet no interventions are provided to reduce posttraumatic stress. This pilot study tests the ability of a smartphone-based web app to prevent and reduce posttraumatic stress in women sexual assault survivors.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States, 80909
        • UCHealth Memorial Central Hospital
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
        • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, SANE Program

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Present for emergency care within 72 hours of sexual assault
  • Receive a sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) exam
  • Alert and oriented

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to consent due to intoxication, serious injury preventing ability to hear, speak, or see to consent, or other causes
  • Prisoners
  • Pregnant women
  • Women living with assailant who plan to continue living with assailant
  • Women with fractures from the assault
  • Admitted patients
  • Women who do not have a smartphone with continuous service for the past 12 months
  • Inability to read and speak English
  • No mailing address
  • SANE exam took place >72 hours ago
  • Patient previously enrolled in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: App Intervention
All participants will receive the web app for prevention of posttraumatic stress.
App for preventing development of posttraumatic stress based on cognitive behavioral techniques.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Week 6 to Month 6 in PCL-5 Scores
Time Frame: change from six weeks and six months
The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist (PCL-5) for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5 (DSM-5) is the gold standard measure of PTSD symptom severity. Range: 0-80. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes. The investigators will assess whether reductions in PTSD symptoms from six weeks to six months are associated with reductions in anxiety sensitivity from the initial visit to six months. Change trajectories and mean scores of PCL-5 scores will be assessed over the 6 months of study follow-up. These patterns will be compared to prior observational research conducted in the lab.
change from six weeks and six months
Change from Week 6 to Month 6 in PROMIS Anxiety Scores
Time Frame: change from six weeks, and six months
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety measures self-reported fear (fearfulness, panic), anxious misery (worry, dread), hyperarousal (tension, nervousness, restlessness), and somatic symptoms (racing heart, dizziness) over the past seven days. Each question has five response options ranging in value from one to five (1=never; 2=rarely; 3=sometimes; 4=often; 5=always). To find the total raw score, sum the values of the response to each question. The lowest raw score is 8; the highest raw score is 40. A higher score represents more of the concept being measured. The investigators will assess whether reductions in PROMIS symptoms from six weeks to six months are associated with reductions in anxiety sensitivity from the initial visit to six months. Change trajectories and mean scores of PROMIS scores will be assessed over the 6 months of study follow-up. These patterns will be compared to prior observational research conducted in the lab.
change from six weeks, and six months
Change from Baseline to Week 6 in ASI Scores
Time Frame: change from Initial to six weeks
Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI) is a 16-item self-report questionnaire that assesses fear of anxiety sensations. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (0 to 4) with total score ranging from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 64 (higher scores indicate greater fear of anxiety sensations). The investigators will assess patterns of ASI scores over the 6 months of study follow-up, specifically using t-tests to test for change from intake to six weeks and six months.
change from Initial to six weeks
Change from Week 6 to Month 6 in PROMIS Depression Scores
Time Frame: change from six weeks, and six months
The PROMIS Depression assesses self-reported negative mood (sadness, guilt), views of self (self-criticism), and social cognition (loneliness), as well as decreased positive affect and engagement (loss of interest, meaning, and purpose) over the past seven days. Each question has five response options ranging in value from one to five (1=never; 2=rarely; 3=sometimes; 4=often; 5=always). To find the total score, sum the values of the response to each question. The lowest raw score is 8; the highest is 40. A higher score represents more of the concept being measured. The investigators will assess whether reductions in PROMIS symptoms from six weeks to six months are associated with reductions in anxiety sensitivity from the initial visit to six months. Change trajectories and mean scores of PROMIS scores will be assessed over the 6 months of study follow-up. These patterns will be compared to prior observational research conducted in the lab.
change from six weeks, and six months
Change from Week 6 to Month 6 in Pain Related to Assault
Time Frame: change from six weeks, and six months
Pain Severity Numeric Rating Scale and Regional Pain Scale. The pain numeric rating scale (Pain NRS) consists of an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicate worse pain. Participants chose the number that best described the pain during the last week. The investigators will assess whether reductions in pain NRS from six weeks to six months are associated with reductions in anxiety sensitivity from the initial visit to six months. Change trajectories and mean scores of pain NRS scores will be assessed over the 6 months of study follow-up. These patterns will be compared to prior observational research conducted in the lab.
change from six weeks, and six months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Insomnia Severity Index Scores
Time Frame: one week, six weeks, six months
The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) is a 7-item self-report questionnaire that provides a measure of insomnia severity based on several indicators (e.g., difficulty falling asleep, satisfaction with sleep, degree of impairment with daytime functioning). It has adequate internal consistency and temporal stability, has been validated against sleep diary and polysomnography data and was sensitive to change in several insomnia treatment studies. The ISI scale range is: minimum = 0, maximum = 28. Lower is considered 'better sleep', while higher is considered 'worse sleep/more insomnia'. This will be assessed at one week, six weeks, and six months to determine whether reductions in ISI from six weeks to six months are associated with reductions in anxiety sensitivity from the initial visit to six months. Change trajectories and mean scores of ISI scores will be assessed over the 6 months of study follow-up. These patterns will be compared to prior observational research conducted in the lab.
one week, six weeks, six months
Somatic Symptoms
Time Frame: one week, six weeks, six months
A previously used questionnaire from the investigator's lab will be used to measure somatic symptoms. This measure is a 21-item self-report measure assessing various somatic symptoms (e.g., headaches, fatigue, feeling faint, stomach distress). Items are rated on a 0-10 point scale, with total scores ranging from 0 to 210. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. This will be assessed at one week, six weeks, and six months. The investigators will assess whether reductions in somatic symptoms from six weeks to six months are associated with reductions in anxiety sensitivity from the initial visit to six months. Change trajectories and mean scores of somatic symptoms scores will be assessed over the 6 months of study follow-up. These patterns will be compared to prior observational research conducted in the lab.
one week, six weeks, six months
Association between Change in General Health and Anxiety Sensitivity
Time Frame: one week, six weeks, six months
PROMIS Global Health-Physical Health Component. The PROMIS was developed by the National Institutes of Health and uses domain-specific measures to assess patient well-being. It uses a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. Higher scores represent poorer health status. This will be assessed at one week, six weeks, and six months. The investigators will assess whether reductions in PROMIS symptoms from six weeks to six months are associated with reductions in anxiety sensitivity from the initial visit to six months. Change trajectories and mean scores of PROMIS scores will be assessed over the 6 months of study follow-up. These patterns will be compared to prior observational research conducted in the lab.
one week, six weeks, six months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nicole Short, PhD, University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 30, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 18, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

November 18, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared by reasonable request beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will become available 9 to 36 months following publication and will remain available for five years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The investigator who proposes to use the data has IRB, IEC, or REB approval, as applicable, and an executed data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Clinical Trials on Mobile Web App

Subscribe