The Discriminative Ability of the Four Balance Measures for Fall History

The Discriminative Ability of the Four Balance Measures for.the Previous Fall Experience in Türkish Community-dwelling Older Adults

The fall rate is increased parallel to the aging process. The early determination and management of falls in older adults are quite crucial to preserve the independence of older adults. In the literature, there are used many measurement tools for predicting fall status. The discriminative ability of these measures is important for the accuracy of the assessment. In this study, four of the most commonly used balance measurement tools will be investigated in terms of the discriminative ability for fall status in the Turkish community-dwelling older adults.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Fall; Balance; Distorted; Older People--Abuse of
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Balance measurement tools

• Study Type: Observational
• Enrollment (Actual): 351

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Turkey
  • Altinordu
    • Ordu, Altinordu, Turkey, 52100
      • Sevim ACARÖZ CANDAN

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 65 years and older (Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

Community-dwelling older adults

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• being aged 65 or above,
• having a score of 21 or more from the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [20,23],
• able to ambulate independently or with an assistive device.

Exclusion Criteria:

• having visual and hearing problems that may cause restrictions in communication and also balance impairments,
• drug use (benzodiazepine, psychotropic drugs, etc.) with adverse effects on balance and walking,
• having any serious neurological, cardiopulmonary, or orthopedic disorders that adversely affected balance conditions.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Fall History	History of fallings will be determined through a question: "How many times have you fallen in the past year?". According to the participants' answers, the participants will be categorized into two groups: fallers (one or more fall events) and non-fallers (no falls).	2 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
One-leg Stance test	The static balance ability will be determined by one-leg stance test. The participants will be asked to stand on her/his dominant leg as long as possible. The standing time will be recorded with a stopwatch in seconds. Higher times indicate the better balance.	1 minute
Berg Balance Scale	This scale will be used to evaluate the balance ability. It consists 14 items which are scored from 0 to 4, for a total score of 56 points possible. Higher scores indicate better balance performance.	20 minutes
Timed Up and Go Test	In this test, participants will be asked to stand from a chair, walk 3 meters (to a line on the floor), turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit back down. Participants are instructed to walk at a comfortable and safe pace during the Timed Up and Go Test. The participant's score is the time it takes to complete the mentioned test. Lower scores indicate better balance performance.	3 minutes
Functional Reach Test	Functional reach will be measured by using a leveled yardstick attached to the wall at the height of the participant's right acromion. To measure the participant's reaching distance, an examiner should stand 4 feet away from the yardstick and should be record the initial and end reach positions. Participant should stand in a relaxed position with feet approximately shoulder-width apart, made a loose fist, and, without touching the wall, placed the right arm parallel to the yardstick (initial position). Participants then will be asked to reach as far forward as they could without losing their balance (end position). The position of the third metacarpal along the yardstick will be recorded at both the initial and end positions. All subjects will be supervised during the test to ensure safety. The mean difference between the initial position and the end position will be calculated as the functional reach score in centimeters. The higher score indicates	2 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: T.C. ORDU ÜNİVERSİTESİ
• Collaborators: Hacettepe University; Giresun University
• Investigators: Study Director: Sevim Acaröz Candan, PhD, T.C. ORDU ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): October 6, 2020
• Primary Completion (Actual): January 30, 2021
• Study Completion (Actual): February 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: April 2, 2020
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 2, 2020
• First Posted (Actual): April 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): March 2, 2022
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 1, 2022
• Last Verified: March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Other Study ID Numbers: OrduU8

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No