Frailty Prevention in Elders From Reunion Island (5P-ECHELLE)

May 10, 2024 updated by: Florian Legrand, Universite de La Reunion

Frailty Prevention in Elders From Reunion Island: Detection of Frailty, Age-related Issues and Risk of Falling Among Community Dwelling Elderly

In Reunion Island, people encounter environmental and social conditions leading to premature ageing and subsequent frailty.

The study evaluates tools, supported by the latest scientific advances in "machine learning" to detect, identify and measure frailty in order to give health professionals the means to act early through preventive actions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The 5P research program is a 6-years program that started in 2016.

Its objective is to set up tools, supported by the latest scientific advances in "machine learning" to detect, identify and measure frailty in order to give health professionals the means to act early through preventive actions.

The diversity and transversal nature of the research disciplines in this program make it original. This allows it, through common protocols, to explore the concept of frailty and the care pathway of the elderly through different prisms of complementary observations.

This program is deployed in three stages: proof of principle, proof of concept (called 5P-PILOT) and "the Scaling up" (called 5P-ECHELLE). It combines an evaluation of the acceptability of technological detection tools, a measurement of the impact of prevention workshops on the loss of autonomy among independent frail elderly people and an evaluation of tools to help detect frailty.

The ageing of the population poses a real societal challenge. The loss of autonomy, which is the result of multiple individual or environmental factors for the ageing person, has a costly impact in terms of recourse to care and on the people around them. It is therefore urgent to act on the levers of frailty by acting as early as possible to prevent its irreversibility.

The "5P ECHELLE" project aims to develop a semi-automatic and non-medical method for detecting weak signals of frailty in older people, by combining standardized clinical indicators for assessing their state of robustness with large-scale intelligent detection devices that allow for longitudinal monitoring, while integrating the necessary participatory dimension of the subject.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

147

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Saint-Joseph, Réunion, 97480
        • Cabinet Dr HUCHOT et Dr GENSOUS
    • La Réunion
      • Saint-Philippe, La Réunion, Réunion, 97417
        • MSPU Care Austral

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients over 65 years of age consulting a general practice. Consecutive participant sampling.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Persons over 65 years of age
  • Retired persons
  • Person affiliated to or benefiting from a social security scheme.
  • Free and informed consent given

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Persons referred to in Articles L1121-5 to L1121-8 of the French Public Health Code (corresponding to all protected persons), pregnant women, parturients, nursing mothers, persons deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision, persons subject to a legal protection measure
  • Difficulty in understanding the French language

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the number of falls
Time Frame: Change from baseline in the number of falls to 6 months.
Collection of falls by diary with monthly telephone survey for 6 months. A fall is defined as an event in which an individual inadvertently falls to the ground or any other surface below the level of origin.
Change from baseline in the number of falls to 6 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in balance performance
Time Frame: Change from baseline in balance performance to 6 months.
The balance measurement was performed on a force platform. The senior citizen was positioned barefoot on the strength platform. The measurement was performed for 30 seconds with eyes open, then with eyes closed for 30 seconds. Postural control acquisition data, and more specifically the displacement of the center of pressure was measured in both the medio-lateral and antero-posterior dimensions. Small variations are better.
Change from baseline in balance performance to 6 months.
Change in gait performance
Time Frame: Change from baseline in balance and gait performance to 6 months.
The gait test was carried out using sensors to analyze and retrieve data from the participant's walk (gait speed, step length, duration of the double support phase). Four X-sens® Motion Tracker Wireless sensors were positioned on the clothes with headbands as follows: one at forehead level on the median sagittal line, the second opposite the L4 vertebra and the last two on the dorsal surface of the right and left feet at mid-foot level. Then, the patient walked 10 meters in a straight line, made a half turn and walked 10 meters again. Higher gait speed is better.
Change from baseline in balance and gait performance to 6 months.
Frailty according to "Fried et al" criteria
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline

The Fried criteria are a list of 5 criteria to define the elderly frailty. Weight loss: "In the last year, have you lost more than 3 kilograms unintentionally?" If yes, then frail for weight loss criterion.

Exhaustion: the following two statements are read. (a) I felt that everything I did was an effort; (b) I could not get going. The question is asked "How often in the last week did you feel this way?" 0 = rarely or none of the time (< 1 day), 1 = some or a little of the time (1-2 days), 2 = a moderate amount of the time (3-4 days), or 3 = most of the time. Subjects answering "2" or "3" to either of these questions are categorized as frail by the exhaustion criterion.

Walk Time: Cutoff for time to walk 4 meters criterion for frailty, >= 7 seconds Grip Strength: cutoff for grip strength (Kilogram) criterion for frailty < 30 for men, <17 for women. A person is frail if 3 out of 5 criteria are found, pre-frail if 1 or 2 are found, or robust if no criterion are found.

Assessed at baseline
The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
The Short Physical Performance Battery is the sum of the scores on three criteria: the balance test, the walking speed test and the chair lift test. This test is used to evaluate the physical performance of an individual. Total points 0 - 12. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Assessed at baseline
Falls Risk for Older People in the Community (FROP-COM)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
The FROP-COM consists of 13 risk factors being rated, most on a graded 0-3 scale. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Assessed at baseline
Who's Integrated care for older people (ICOPE) screening tool
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline

Who's "ICOPE" screening tool consists of 5 tests: Cognitive decline: Remember three words: flower, door, rice (for example) and recalls, Limited mobility: Chair rise test: Rise from chair five times without using arms. Did the person complete five chair rises within 14 seconds? Weight loss: Have you unintentionally lost more than 3 kg over the last three months? Visual impairment: Do you have any problems with your eyes: difficulties in seeing far, reading, eye diseases or currently under medical treatment (e.g. diabetes, high blood pressure)? Hearing lost: Hears whispers (whisper test). Depressive symptoms: Over the past two weeks, have you been bothered by

  • feeling down, depressed or hopeless?
  • little interest or pleasure in doing things? Score from 0 to 5, Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Assessed at baseline
The "Codex" score
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline

The "Codex" test assesses the cognitive functions of elderly subjects in less than 3 minutes. It test involves memory, executive functions, attention, and visual-spatial praxis.

It includes:

  • a memory task: memorize 3 words, then recall them,
  • the drawing of a watch face: this is the simplified clock test,
  • and according to the results of these first 2 tasks: 5 questions of orientation in space.

If the 2 tasks (Clock and 3 words recall) are normal, the test is over: CODEX normal. If the 2 tasks are abnormal, the test is finished : CODEX abnormal!

Assessed at baseline
Height in meters
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
Height in meters using a height gauge. Weight and height will be combined to report Body Mass Index (BMI) in kg/m^2
Assessed at baseline
Weight in kilograms
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
The weight in kilos using a scale. Weight and height will be combined to report Body Mass Index (BMI) in kg/m^2.
Assessed at baseline
The Evaluation of precariousness and health inequalities in the examination centers" (EPICES) score
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
EPICES score (Evaluation of precariousness and health inequalities in the examination centers) is an individual indicator of precariousness that takes into account the multidimensional nature of precariousness. multidimensional nature of precariousness. The main interest of the EPICES score is to apprehend populations which, while not covered by traditional administrative indicators of precariousness, present the same health risks. The answer to each question is The sum of the 11 answers gives the EPICES score. The score is The score is continuous and varies from 0 (no precariousness) to 100 (maximum precariousness). The threshold of 30 is considered the precariousness threshold according to "EPICES".
Assessed at baseline
Standardised Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS) Moran
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
A simple 8-question personality disorder screening test. A total score of 3/8 or more indicates personality disorder is likely.
Assessed at baseline
The frailty of groups with equal resources (FRAGIRE) grid.
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
The FRAGIRE grid is an assessment tool that aims to detect, among non-dependent retirees. It consists of 17 multiple-choice questions on physiological feelings, state of health, depression, pleasure, suicidal thoughts, social and cultural environment, taste, appetite, oral health, motor skills and 1 question for the evaluator on the person's state of health. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Assessed at baseline
Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form (SF-36)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
Quality of life assessed by Short-Form 36 questionnaire. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Assessed at baseline
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scale is an instrument for screening for anxiety and depressive disorders. It includes 14 items rated from 0 to 3. Seven questions relate to anxiety (total A) and seven others to the depressive dimension (total D), thus making it possible to obtain two scores (maximum score for each score = 21). Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Assessed at baseline
Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly Screening (HHIE-S)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly Screening is a self-assessment tool containing 10 questions aimed to assess the impact of hearing loss in the emotional and social-situational adjustments of elderly patients who are not institutionalized. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Assessed at baseline
Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
The Mini-Mental State Examination is a cognitive assessment instrument developed for rapid screening of cognitive deficits in 30 questions. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Assessed at baseline
World Health Organization (WHO) visual acuity measurement
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
Measurement of visual acuity using the Raskin E scale. Distance visual acuity measured at 3 meters and near visual acuity at 40 centimeters. Score expressed in 1/(arc min). Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Assessed at baseline
The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
The MNA consists of two parts with 18 items and a score out of 30. The sum of the MNA score distinguishes between elderly patients with: 1) adequate nutritional status, MNA ≥ 24; 2) protein-calorie malnutrition, MNA < 17; 3) at risk of malnutrition, MNA between 17 and 23.5. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Assessed at baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jean-Marc EYCHENE, MD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion
  • Study Director: Pierre-Paul VIDAL, MD, Laboratoire Borelli
  • Study Director: Frederic SANDRON, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)
  • Study Director: Jean-Marc FRANCO, MD, Universite de La Reunion

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 27, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 27, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 202005974

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Frail Elderly Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Instrumental measurement of balance and gait

Subscribe