Lacrimal Dilator-Facilitated vs Standard Sub-Tenon's Block

April 10, 2020 updated by: Oya Yalcin Cok, Baskent University

Lacrimal Dilator-Facilitated Incisionless Vs. Standard Sub-Tenon's Block: A Randomized, Prospective and Non-inferiority Comparative Study

Standard sub-Tenon's block involves incision (dissection) of conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule with the help of blunt scissors and forceps, insertion of a blunt sub-Tenon's cannula under the Tenon's capsule and injection of local anaesthetic agent. This block is frequently associated with minor complications such as chemosis and subconjunctival haemorrhage. Different variations of incisionless sub-Tenon's block including the use of lacrimal dilator have been described to reduce minor complications and facilitate insertion of blunt cannula. Lacrimal dilator creates a small aperture in the conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule thus avoids incision. After ethics approval, patients undergoing elective cataract surgery were enrolled to receive sub-Tenon's block performed without incision with a lacrimal dilator (Group LD) or with incision using Wescott scissors and blunt forceps (Group WS). All patients received 3 mL 2% lidocaine without any adjuvant. No sedation was administered. Demographic of the patients, duration of the procedure, analgesia (pain), akinesia, duration of the procedure intraoperative chemosis, subconjunctival haemorrhage on the first postoperative day. We aimed to compare lacrimal dilator-facilitated and standard sub-Tenon's block effectiveness and incidence of chemosis and subconjunctival haemorrhage.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The patients were randomly allocated to receive STB performed with a lacrimal dilator (Group LD) and with a Wescott scissors (Group WS). Randomization was ensured by sealed envelopes prepared according to a computer-generated table and the envelopes were opened by the operator just before the sub-Tenon's block.

Study protocol Local anaesthetic eye drops were installed into the conjunctiva, followed by iodine 5% aqueous drops to the conjunctival sac for 3 minutes.19 An eye lid speculum was inserted.

In group LD, the conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule were lifted together tightly with a blunt forceps like a tent in the inferonasal quadrant and a punctal dilatator was placed tangential to the globe creating a round and small hole at 5 mm posterior to limbus. The block was performed using smooth rounded tip, 19 G, 1 inch sub-Tenon's cannula .

In Group WS, after lifting the conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule together with a blunt forceps, incision was performed with a blunt tip Westcott scissors in the inferonasal conjunctival at 5 mm posterior to limbus to expose sub-Tenon's space. The block was performed with the above sub-Tenon's cannula.

All patients received lidocaine 2%, 3 mL without any adjuvant. No sedative was administered. All the blocks and surgeries were performed by the same investigator, but block evaluations were made by another investigator who was blinded to the technique used. All patients were discharged on the day of surgery.

The parameters recorded included demographic of the patients, duration of the procedure, analgesia (pain), akinesia, duration of the procedure intraoperative chemosis, subconjunctival haemorrhage on the first postoperative day. Analgesia was evaluated using a numeric rating scale for pain (0-10; 0 - no pain, 10 - the worst imaginable pain) immediately after the operation. Akinesia (ocular movements) were checked according to 4-primary gazes 10 minutes after STB. Chemosis and conjunctival haemorrhage (1st postoperative day) were assessed according to the number of quadrant or quadrants affected (superior nasal, superior temporal, inferior nasal, inferior temporal) using a 5-point scale (0-4; 0 - no for chemosis and haemorrhage, 4 for chemosis or haemorrhage in all 4 quadrants).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Adana, Turkey, 01250
        • Baskent University, Adana Research and Training Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 88 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

patients undergoing cataract surgery by phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation

Exclusion Criteria:

allergy to lidocaine, history of previous retinal and strabismus surgery, bleeding disorders and oral anticoagulant use, presence of glaucoma or high IOP, thick pterygia, any pathological condition that conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule cannot be lifted away from the sclera

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: a lacrimal dilator group (Group LD)
The patients allocated to receive STB performed with a lacrimal dilator

Local anaesthetic eye drops were installed into the conjunctiva, followed by iodine 5% aqueous drops to the conjunctival sac for 3 minutes.19 An eye lid speculum was inserted.

In group LD, the conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule were lifted together tightly with a blunt forceps like a tent in the inferonasal quadrant and a punctal dilatator (Castroviejo Lacrimal Dilatator, Katena Products, Inc, Denville, NJ, USA) was placed tangential to the globe creating a round and small hole at 5 mm posterior to limbus (Fig.1). The block was performed using smooth rounded tip, 19 G, 1 inch sub-Tenon's cannula (Visitec, Beaver-Visitec International Ltd, Warwickshire, UK).

In Group WS, after lifting the conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule together with a blunt forceps, incision was performed with a blunt tip Westcott scissors in the inferonasal conjunctival at 5 mm posterior to limbus to expose sub-Tenon's space.

Active Comparator: a Wescott scissors (Group WS)
The patients allocated to receive STB performed with a Wescott scissors

Local anaesthetic eye drops were installed into the conjunctiva, followed by iodine 5% aqueous drops to the conjunctival sac for 3 minutes.19 An eye lid speculum was inserted.

In group LD, the conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule were lifted together tightly with a blunt forceps like a tent in the inferonasal quadrant and a punctal dilatator (Castroviejo Lacrimal Dilatator, Katena Products, Inc, Denville, NJ, USA) was placed tangential to the globe creating a round and small hole at 5 mm posterior to limbus (Fig.1). The block was performed using smooth rounded tip, 19 G, 1 inch sub-Tenon's cannula (Visitec, Beaver-Visitec International Ltd, Warwickshire, UK).

In Group WS, after lifting the conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule together with a blunt forceps, incision was performed with a blunt tip Westcott scissors in the inferonasal conjunctival at 5 mm posterior to limbus to expose sub-Tenon's space.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
chemosis
Time Frame: 10 minutes after intervention
swelling of the conjunctiva
10 minutes after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
subconjunctival haemorrhage
Time Frame: on the postoperative first day
haemorrhage due to tearing or severing of blood vessels during dissection and injection
on the postoperative first day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

October 15, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

This will be decided according to the content of the request

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

3
Subscribe