- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04345172
Lacrimal Dilator-Facilitated vs Standard Sub-Tenon's Block
Lacrimal Dilator-Facilitated Incisionless Vs. Standard Sub-Tenon's Block: A Randomized, Prospective and Non-inferiority Comparative Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The patients were randomly allocated to receive STB performed with a lacrimal dilator (Group LD) and with a Wescott scissors (Group WS). Randomization was ensured by sealed envelopes prepared according to a computer-generated table and the envelopes were opened by the operator just before the sub-Tenon's block.
Study protocol Local anaesthetic eye drops were installed into the conjunctiva, followed by iodine 5% aqueous drops to the conjunctival sac for 3 minutes.19 An eye lid speculum was inserted.
In group LD, the conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule were lifted together tightly with a blunt forceps like a tent in the inferonasal quadrant and a punctal dilatator was placed tangential to the globe creating a round and small hole at 5 mm posterior to limbus. The block was performed using smooth rounded tip, 19 G, 1 inch sub-Tenon's cannula .
In Group WS, after lifting the conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule together with a blunt forceps, incision was performed with a blunt tip Westcott scissors in the inferonasal conjunctival at 5 mm posterior to limbus to expose sub-Tenon's space. The block was performed with the above sub-Tenon's cannula.
All patients received lidocaine 2%, 3 mL without any adjuvant. No sedative was administered. All the blocks and surgeries were performed by the same investigator, but block evaluations were made by another investigator who was blinded to the technique used. All patients were discharged on the day of surgery.
The parameters recorded included demographic of the patients, duration of the procedure, analgesia (pain), akinesia, duration of the procedure intraoperative chemosis, subconjunctival haemorrhage on the first postoperative day. Analgesia was evaluated using a numeric rating scale for pain (0-10; 0 - no pain, 10 - the worst imaginable pain) immediately after the operation. Akinesia (ocular movements) were checked according to 4-primary gazes 10 minutes after STB. Chemosis and conjunctival haemorrhage (1st postoperative day) were assessed according to the number of quadrant or quadrants affected (superior nasal, superior temporal, inferior nasal, inferior temporal) using a 5-point scale (0-4; 0 - no for chemosis and haemorrhage, 4 for chemosis or haemorrhage in all 4 quadrants).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Adana, Turkey, 01250
- Baskent University, Adana Research and Training Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
patients undergoing cataract surgery by phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation
Exclusion Criteria:
allergy to lidocaine, history of previous retinal and strabismus surgery, bleeding disorders and oral anticoagulant use, presence of glaucoma or high IOP, thick pterygia, any pathological condition that conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule cannot be lifted away from the sclera
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: a lacrimal dilator group (Group LD)
The patients allocated to receive STB performed with a lacrimal dilator
|
Local anaesthetic eye drops were installed into the conjunctiva, followed by iodine 5% aqueous drops to the conjunctival sac for 3 minutes.19 An eye lid speculum was inserted. In group LD, the conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule were lifted together tightly with a blunt forceps like a tent in the inferonasal quadrant and a punctal dilatator (Castroviejo Lacrimal Dilatator, Katena Products, Inc, Denville, NJ, USA) was placed tangential to the globe creating a round and small hole at 5 mm posterior to limbus (Fig.1). The block was performed using smooth rounded tip, 19 G, 1 inch sub-Tenon's cannula (Visitec, Beaver-Visitec International Ltd, Warwickshire, UK). In Group WS, after lifting the conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule together with a blunt forceps, incision was performed with a blunt tip Westcott scissors in the inferonasal conjunctival at 5 mm posterior to limbus to expose sub-Tenon's space. |
Active Comparator: a Wescott scissors (Group WS)
The patients allocated to receive STB performed with a Wescott scissors
|
Local anaesthetic eye drops were installed into the conjunctiva, followed by iodine 5% aqueous drops to the conjunctival sac for 3 minutes.19 An eye lid speculum was inserted. In group LD, the conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule were lifted together tightly with a blunt forceps like a tent in the inferonasal quadrant and a punctal dilatator (Castroviejo Lacrimal Dilatator, Katena Products, Inc, Denville, NJ, USA) was placed tangential to the globe creating a round and small hole at 5 mm posterior to limbus (Fig.1). The block was performed using smooth rounded tip, 19 G, 1 inch sub-Tenon's cannula (Visitec, Beaver-Visitec International Ltd, Warwickshire, UK). In Group WS, after lifting the conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule together with a blunt forceps, incision was performed with a blunt tip Westcott scissors in the inferonasal conjunctival at 5 mm posterior to limbus to expose sub-Tenon's space. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
chemosis
Time Frame: 10 minutes after intervention
|
swelling of the conjunctiva
|
10 minutes after intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
subconjunctival haemorrhage
Time Frame: on the postoperative first day
|
haemorrhage due to tearing or severing of blood vessels during dissection and injection
|
on the postoperative first day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- KA19/165
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.