Comparison of Dentin Hypersensitivity Reduction Over a 1-month Period

Comparison of Dentin Hypersensitivity Reduction Over a 1-month Period Between a Single Topical Application of a Dentin-desensitizing Agent (Gluma) and Other Materials: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Here we assessed the clinical effectiveness of Gluma, fluoride varnish, and the Tetric N-Bond one-step self-etch system in alleviating DH instantly and over 1 month, after a single topical application.A randomized, double-blind, clinical trial was conducted on 55 patients (25 males, 30 females; age: 20-49 years). Seventy teeth were randomly assigned to three groups: Gluma (n = 24); fluoride varnish (n = 23); and Tetric N-Bond adhesive (n = 23). Sensitivity to tactile, air blast, and cold stimuli were investigated.. A visual analogue scale was used to assess tactile stimuli, and the Schiff Cold Scale to assess air blast and cold stimuli. DH was evaluated immediately post-treatment, and at the 2-week and 1-month follow-up. Between-group and within-group comparisons were made.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Dentin Sensitivity
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Gluma; Other: fluoride varnish; Other: Tetric N-Bond self-etch adhesive

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 55
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Saudi Arabia
  • Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
    • King Abdulaziz University

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 20 years to 49 years (Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Middle-aged adult population who usually complains of Dentin Hypersensitivity.
• Age range 20-49 years, that visit the dental hospital at King Abdul-Aziz university (KAUDH) who would have at least one or two teeth with DH
• Those with recession of the gingiva, teeth erosion or abrasion.
• Patients agreed to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients going through professional desensitizing treatment during the previous three months; Using desensitizing tooth paste in the last two months
• Chronic; far on progress periodontal disease; treatment for periodontal disease;
• Teeth with ICDAS (International Caries Detection and Assessment System) score 4
• Teeth diagnosed for irreversible pulpitis; root canal treated teeth
• Teeth covered with crowns; bridge
• Teeth with cervical restorations interfering with the evaluation
• Medically compromised patients currently using medications like anticonvulsants, antihistamines, antidepressants, sedatives or daily analgesics.
• Pregnant or lactating women; were also excluded.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Quadruple

Number of Arms

3

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Tactile stimulus; The tactile stimulus was examined using an explorer (# 17/23), passing at a right angle to the bucco-cervical tooth surface of concern. Contributors evaluated participants' pain score on a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS). The stimulus was used to assess dentine hypersensitivity at baseline and immediately after completion of treatment. Subjects were also recalled for re-evaluation at 2 weeks and at 1 month after desensitizing treatment.	Other: Gluma; Gluma is desensitizing agent by (Heraeus Kulzer, Armonk, NY, USA) claimed to treat dentine hypersensitivity in exposed cervical teeth surfaces and was applied to participants using a mini brush applicator tip onto the exposed hypersensitive tooth surface requiring treatment and was allowed to dry for 60 seconds. Then Dentine hypersensitivity (DH) was assessed for tactile, cold, and air blast stimuli immediately after completion of treatment. Subjects were also recalled for re-evaluation at 2 weeks and at 1 month after desensitizing treatment.; Other: fluoride varnish; fluoride varnish is usually applied to patients to prevent caries development but was claimed in some cases to also relief dentine hypersensitivity and was applied as a thin layer to the surface of the tooth using an applicator. The varnish set rapidly, and thereafter moisture contamination was not a concern. Patients were advised to not brush or floss their teeth for a couple of hours and to abstain from hot beverages. DH was assessed for tactile, cold, and air blast stimuli immediately after completion of treatment. Subjects were also recalled for re-evaluation at 2 weeks and at 1 month after desensitizing treatment.; Other: Tetric N-Bond self-etch adhesive; Tetric N-Bond self-etch adhesive is one step dental adhesive and is also claimed to relief dentine hypersensitivity due to blockage of dentinal tubules. It was applied according to the manufacturer's instructions, in a thick layer, for at least 30 seconds, using a light brushing motion. Then, it was dried with a steady stream of air for 3 seconds and light-cured for 10 seconds. DH was assessed for tactile, cold, and air blast stimuli immediately after completion of treatment. Subjects were also recalled for re-evaluation at 2 weeks and at 1 month after desensitizing treatment.
Active Comparator: Air blast stimulus; For air blast stimuli, air was delivered by a three-way syringe from a typical dental unit air syringe at 40 psi (± 10 psi) and 70 °F (± 5 °F). The air flow was aimed at the tooth surface of concern, for 1 second, from a distance of 1 cm. The air blast stimulus scores were assessed by the Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale 18. DH was assessed for air blast stimuli at baseline and immediately after completion of treatment. Subjects were also recalled for re-evaluation at 2 weeks and at 1 month after desensitizing treatment.	Other: Gluma; Gluma is desensitizing agent by (Heraeus Kulzer, Armonk, NY, USA) claimed to treat dentine hypersensitivity in exposed cervical teeth surfaces and was applied to participants using a mini brush applicator tip onto the exposed hypersensitive tooth surface requiring treatment and was allowed to dry for 60 seconds. Then Dentine hypersensitivity (DH) was assessed for tactile, cold, and air blast stimuli immediately after completion of treatment. Subjects were also recalled for re-evaluation at 2 weeks and at 1 month after desensitizing treatment.; Other: fluoride varnish; fluoride varnish is usually applied to patients to prevent caries development but was claimed in some cases to also relief dentine hypersensitivity and was applied as a thin layer to the surface of the tooth using an applicator. The varnish set rapidly, and thereafter moisture contamination was not a concern. Patients were advised to not brush or floss their teeth for a couple of hours and to abstain from hot beverages. DH was assessed for tactile, cold, and air blast stimuli immediately after completion of treatment. Subjects were also recalled for re-evaluation at 2 weeks and at 1 month after desensitizing treatment.; Other: Tetric N-Bond self-etch adhesive; Tetric N-Bond self-etch adhesive is one step dental adhesive and is also claimed to relief dentine hypersensitivity due to blockage of dentinal tubules. It was applied according to the manufacturer's instructions, in a thick layer, for at least 30 seconds, using a light brushing motion. Then, it was dried with a steady stream of air for 3 seconds and light-cured for 10 seconds. DH was assessed for tactile, cold, and air blast stimuli immediately after completion of treatment. Subjects were also recalled for re-evaluation at 2 weeks and at 1 month after desensitizing treatment.
Active Comparator: Cold stimulus; For cold hypersensitivity assessment, the tooth was isolated using cotton rolls; then, a few drops of extremely cold water were delivered to the tooth from a syringe that had previously been cooled. The cold stimulus scores were assessed by the Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale 18. DH was assessed for cold stimulus at baseline and immediately after completion of treatment. Subjects were also recalled for re-evaluation at 2 weeks and at 1 month after desensitizing treatment.	Other: Gluma; Gluma is desensitizing agent by (Heraeus Kulzer, Armonk, NY, USA) claimed to treat dentine hypersensitivity in exposed cervical teeth surfaces and was applied to participants using a mini brush applicator tip onto the exposed hypersensitive tooth surface requiring treatment and was allowed to dry for 60 seconds. Then Dentine hypersensitivity (DH) was assessed for tactile, cold, and air blast stimuli immediately after completion of treatment. Subjects were also recalled for re-evaluation at 2 weeks and at 1 month after desensitizing treatment.; Other: fluoride varnish; fluoride varnish is usually applied to patients to prevent caries development but was claimed in some cases to also relief dentine hypersensitivity and was applied as a thin layer to the surface of the tooth using an applicator. The varnish set rapidly, and thereafter moisture contamination was not a concern. Patients were advised to not brush or floss their teeth for a couple of hours and to abstain from hot beverages. DH was assessed for tactile, cold, and air blast stimuli immediately after completion of treatment. Subjects were also recalled for re-evaluation at 2 weeks and at 1 month after desensitizing treatment.; Other: Tetric N-Bond self-etch adhesive; Tetric N-Bond self-etch adhesive is one step dental adhesive and is also claimed to relief dentine hypersensitivity due to blockage of dentinal tubules. It was applied according to the manufacturer's instructions, in a thick layer, for at least 30 seconds, using a light brushing motion. Then, it was dried with a steady stream of air for 3 seconds and light-cured for 10 seconds. DH was assessed for tactile, cold, and air blast stimuli immediately after completion of treatment. Subjects were also recalled for re-evaluation at 2 weeks and at 1 month after desensitizing treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Assess dentine hypersensitivity score to stimuli at Baseline	Scores of DH for tactile stimulus were recorded using visual analogue scale and for cold, and air blast stimuli using the Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale 18 at baseline.	Baseline before treatment
Assess dentine hypersensitivity score to stimuli immediately after treatment by intervention	Scores of DH for tactile stimulus were recorded using visual analogue scale and for cold, and air blast stimuli using the Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale 18 were recorded immediately after treatment with intervention and compared score to baseline.	From baseline to immediately after treatment with intervention
Assess dentine hypersensitivity to stimuli at two-weeks follow up after treatment by intervention	Scores of DH for tactile stimulus were recorded using visual analogue scale and for cold, and air blast stimuli using the Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale 18 were recorded at two-weeks follow up after treatment with intervention and compared score to baseline and immediate treatment scores.	From baseline to two-weeks follow up after treatment with intervention
Assess dentine hypersensitivity to stimuli at one month follow up after treatment by intervention	Scores of DH for tactile stimulus were recorded using visual analogue scale and for cold, and air blast stimuli using the Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale 18 were recorded at one month (30 days) follow up after treatment with intervention and compared score to baseline and immediate treatment, and two weeks follow up visit scores.	From baseline to one month follow up after treatment with intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: King Abdulaziz University
• Investigators: Study Chair: Samar H Abuzinadah, DScD, Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, King Abdul-Aziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Study Director: Abdulrahman J Alhaddad, DScD, Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, King Abdul-Aziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Abuzinadah SH, Alhaddad AJ. A randomized clinical trial of dentin hypersensitivity reduction over one month after a single topical application of comparable materials. Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 24;11(1):6793. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86258-3.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): January 10, 2020
• Primary Completion (Actual): February 9, 2020
• Study Completion (Actual): February 9, 2020

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: April 10, 2020
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 15, 2020
• First Posted (Actual): April 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): April 17, 2020
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 15, 2020
• Last Verified: April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Hypersensitivity; Gluma; Desensitizing agent
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Immune System Diseases; Stomatognathic Diseases; Tooth Diseases; Hypersensitivity; Dentin Sensitivity; Physiological Effects of Drugs; Protective Agents; Cariostatic Agents; Fluorides; Fluorides, Topical
• Other Study ID Numbers: 129-09-19

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: No