Endovascular Versus Medical Treatment for the Pelvic Congestion Syndrome (ENDPCS)

April 20, 2020 updated by: Eduardo Sebastian Sarutte Rosello, MD VS MSc, Hospital de Clínicas Dr. Manuel Quintela
Compare the efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment with sandwich technique (controlled release coils and 2% polidocanol foam) associated with diosmin-hisperidine and ibuprofen medical treatment and only the best chronic medical treatment available diosmin-hisperidine and ibuprofen for 3 months, in women of active gynecological age carrying pelvic congestion syndrome in public assistance in Montevideo, Uruguay.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS) is a recognized and frequent cause of Chronic Pelvic Pain (10% to 30%). It is defined as the presence of chronic symptoms, which may include pelvic pain, perineal heaviness, urinary urgency and postcoital pain, caused by reflux and / or obstruction of the gonadic and / or pelvic veins, and that may be associated with vulvar, perineal and lower limbs varicose veins.

There is no standard approach to managing PCS. According to expert recommendations, therapies should be individualized according to the patient's symptoms and needs.

Medical treatment options include progestagens, danazol, combined oral hormonal contraceptives, phlebotonics such as hisperidine-added diosmin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists

Currently, the only accepted chronic medical treatment is the association of non-steroidal and phlebotonic anti-inflammatories, but they have shown a poor symptomatic benefit in reducing pain.

Surgical treatment has evolved over time mainly in the hands of laparoscopic techniques, currently the endovascular option is the most widely accepted for presenting excellent long-term results with abolition of pain in up to 90% at 2 years.

HYPOTHESIS

Endovascular treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome is better in terms of pain control and quality of life compared to drug treatment.

General objective

Compare the efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment with sandwich technique (controlled release coils and 2% polidocanol foam) associated with diosmin-hisperidine and ibuprofen medical treatment and only the best chronic medical treatment available diosmin-hisperidine and ibuprofen for 3 months, in women of active gynecological age carrying pelvic congestion syndrome in public assistance in Montevideo, Uruguay.

Specific objectives

• Compare pain in patients undergoing endovascular treatment with the best

medical treatment.

  • Evaluate the persistence of pelvic varices in patients undergoing endovascular treatment of SCP.
  • Compare the Female Sexual Satisfaction Index in both groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Active gynecological age
  • Chronic pelvic pain diagnosed by gynecologist of at least 6 months of evolution.
  • Transvaginal duplex ultrasound: presence of periuterine varicose veins defined by veins larger than 5mm in diameter with reflux greater than 0.5 seconds on Valsava maneuvers.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of other causes of chronic pelvic pain: endometriosis, pelvic inflammatory disease, postoperative adhesions, uterine myoma, adenomyosis, ovarian tumors, polycystic ovary.
  • Fibromyalgia
  • BMI greater than 35
  • Chronic kidney disease
  • thrombophilia
  • Alterationof coagulation.
  • Allergy to iodinated contrast medium.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Interventional treatment plus best chronic medical treatment
Sandwich embolization ( 2% polidocanol + Coils) Diosmin hisperidin 1g twice a day for 6 months Ibuprofen 500mg 3 times a day for 6 months
coil embolization of the reflux pathways
Other Names:
  • concerto detachable coil system
Pelvic varices sclerosis with polidocanol foam
Other Names:
  • Foam sclerosis with polidocanol 2%
Best chronic medial treatment
Other Names:
  • daflon
NSAID treatment
Other Names:
  • Nsaid
Active Comparator: Best chronic medical treatment alone
Diosmin hisperidin 1g twice a day for 6 months Ibuprofen 500mg 3 times a day for 6 months
Best chronic medial treatment
Other Names:
  • daflon
NSAID treatment
Other Names:
  • Nsaid

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 30 days
Pain assessment 1-10 from no pain to severe
30 days
visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 3 months
Pain assessment 1-10 from no pain to severe
3 months
Lattinen index
Time Frame: 30 days
chronic pain assessment 2-22 from low to high
30 days
Lattinen index
Time Frame: 3 months
chronic pain assessment 2-22 from low to high
3 months
McGill Pain Questionnaire
Time Frame: 30 days
subjective pain experience assessment
30 days
McGill Pain Questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 months
subjective pain experience assessment
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Female sexual function index
Time Frame: 30 days
questionnaire that assesses different domains of sexual function. 0-48 from no sexual distress to high level of sexual distress
30 days
Female sexual function index
Time Frame: 3 months
questionnaire that assesses different domains of sexual function. . 0-48 from no sexual distress to high level of sexual distress
3 months
varicose and reflux persistance by transabdominal duplex scan
Time Frame: 30 days
transabdominal duplex scan: varicose permeability, prescience of gonadic or iliac reflux
30 days
varicose and reflux persistance by transabdominal duplex scan
Time Frame: 3 months
transabdominal duplex scan: varicose permeability, prescience of gonadic or iliac reflux
3 months
varicose and reflux persistance by transvaginal duplex scan
Time Frame: 3 months
transabdominal duplex scan: varicose permeability, prescience of gonadic or iliac reflux
3 months
varicose persistance assesment by tomography
Time Frame: 3 months
angiotomography: Varicose and conadic Patency
3 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Deep venous thrombosis by duplex ultrasound
Time Frame: 30 days
Deep venous thrombosis of the iliac or femoral axis will be reported
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sebastian Sarutte, VS, Centro Cardiovascular Universitario

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

October 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

De-identified data base for all variables will be available for researchers

IPD Sharing Time Frame

From April 2022 to april 2024

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be shared on request, after signing a discretion agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Venous Disease

Clinical Trials on Medtronic® Concerto® detachable coil system

3
Subscribe