Patient Recovery From Heart Surgery During the Covid-19 Pandemic (CardiacCovid)

October 11, 2022 updated by: Barts & The London NHS Trust

An Observational Cohort Study to Explore Patient Outcome From Heart Surgery During the Covid-19 Pandemic (CardiacCovid)

This study will describe and explore the recovery process of patients undergoing cardiac surgery during the covid-19 pandemic. This will include mortality, morbidity, health-related quality of life, event-specific distress and depression.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The overall aim of this study is to describe and explore the recovery process of patients undergoing cardiac surgery during the covid-19 pandemic. This will include mortality, morbidity, health-related quality of life, event-specific distress and depression.

All adult patients having cardiac surgery during the pandemic at St Bartholomew's Hospital will be approached to join this study. As of the end of March this is this is approximately 20 operations a week. Questionnaires will be administered at five time points alongside a review of clinical notes.

Appropriate descriptive and summative statistics will be used to analyse outcomes. If sample size is adequate, possible associations/effect of the impact of the covid-19 pandemic on each of the recovery parameters included in the study will be determined. The differences in outcomes between those with and without covid-19 may also be analysed if the sample size is adequate. Bias and loss to follow-up in observational cohort studies has been considered.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

253

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, EC1A 7DN
        • St Bartholomew'S Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 120 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Undergoing cardiac surgery during the Covid-19 pandemic (end date as yet unknown but inferred when elective surgery is reinstated)
  • Discharge from hospital where operation was performed is being planned
  • Able and willing to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable or unwilling to give written informed consent. This includes patients who are being transferred to another hospital and are considered too vulnerable or unwell to be approached (based on clinical judgement of the clinical care team)
  • Unable or unwilling to give and/or complete the questionnaires
  • Inability to understand written and/or verbal English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Cardiac surgery patients - lockdown 1
Cohort 1 (lockdown 1): Patients undergoing adult cardiac surgery during the Covid-19 pandemic
Cardiac surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic
Cardiac surgery patients - lockdown 2
Cohort 2 (lockdown 2): Patients undergoing adult cardiac surgery during the Covid-19 pandemic
Cardiac surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic
Cardiac surgery patients - lockdown 3
Cohort 3 (lockdown 3): Patients undergoing adult cardiac surgery during the Covid-19 pandemic
Cardiac surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Impact of Events scores
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week after discharge, 6 weeks (+/- 2 weeks) post surgery, 6 months (+/- 2 weeks) post surgery, 1 year (+/- 2 weeks) post surgery
The revised Impact of Events revised version (IES-R) questionnaire (Weiss and Marmar, 1997) is widely used as a measure of event-specific distress and measures distress experienced by serious life changes/events. It has been commonly used to assess persons with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). It is an 22 item self-report scale where is item is reported on a five point likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) with respect to how distressing each item has been during the past week. Scale scores are formed for the three subscales, which reflect intrusion (8 items: 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 14, 16, 20), avoidance (8 items: 5,7,8,11,12,13,17,22), and hyperarousal (6 items: 4,10,15.18.19.21). A cut-off of 26 and above has been suggested for a clinically significant reaction to a psychological trauma, although the IES alone does not diagnose PTSD or reflect a person's ability to function. Metric for summarising data: t-test
Baseline, 1 week after discharge, 6 weeks (+/- 2 weeks) post surgery, 6 months (+/- 2 weeks) post surgery, 1 year (+/- 2 weeks) post surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survival
Time Frame: Up to 1 year post surgery
Death or survival after cardiac surgery
Up to 1 year post surgery
Morbidity
Time Frame: Up to 1 year post surgery
patient completion of a log sheet documenting all 'visits' (including calls to NHS 111, face-to-face or virtual visits) to the emergency department, hospital admissions and visits to the general practitioner on a standardised proforma for the duration of the study
Up to 1 year post surgery
Change in Health-related quality of life scores
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week after discharge, 6 weeks (+/- 2 weeks) post surgery, 6 months (+/- 2 weeks) post surgery, 1 year (+/- 2 weeks) post surgery
Health-related quality of life will be measured using the EQ5D-5L questionnaire. The EQ5D is a standardised, simple generic measure of health well, which is received by patients (Kim et al., 2005). It consists of five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each with five levels of health response and a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0-100 (0 being the worst possible health imaginable and 100 being the best possible health imaginable). Metric for summarising data: t-test
Baseline, 1 week after discharge, 6 weeks (+/- 2 weeks) post surgery, 6 months (+/- 2 weeks) post surgery, 1 year (+/- 2 weeks) post surgery
Change in Depression scores
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week after discharge, 6 weeks (+/- 2 weeks) post surgery, 6 months (+/- 2 weeks) post surgery, 1 year (+/- 2 weeks) post surgery
Depression will be measured using the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). The CES-D is a 20-item self-report adult instrument designed to measure common symptoms of depression that have occurred over the past week, such as poor appetite, hopelessness, pessimism, and fatigue. All questions are answered on a scale of 0-3, with 0 indicating no symptom presence and with 3 representing symptoms "most or all of the time." CES-D scores range from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms. A score of 16 or higher identifies subjects with clinically meaningful depression. Metric for summarising data: t-test
Baseline, 1 week after discharge, 6 weeks (+/- 2 weeks) post surgery, 6 months (+/- 2 weeks) post surgery, 1 year (+/- 2 weeks) post surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Julie Sanders, PhD, St. Bartholomew's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 18, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 3, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 3, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID

Clinical Trials on Cardiac surgery

Subscribe