The Efficacy of Implementing a Treatment Algorithm in Managing Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA) in the Extremely Low Birth Weight Neonatal Population.

August 31, 2021 updated by: Pediatrix
To evaluate whether utilizing a standardized patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) treatment algorithm in managing ELBW (extremely low birth weight) neonates ≤1000 grams (g) improves clinical outcomes and helps prevent undesirable side effects from PDAs.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The treatment of PDAs (patent ductus arteriosus) in both the premature and term neonatal population has been the source of thorough research for decades. Common treatment pathways include supportive care, pharmaceutical treatment (via indomethacin, ibuprofen, or acetaminophen), and surgical correction. Many PDAs self-resolve, some are not detected to adulthood, and others may never be discovered. However, determining which neonates with PDAs require pharmaceutical versus surgical management, and which can be managed with supportive care, can be difficult to differentiate. A standardized neonatal PDA treatment algorithm, one that assesses clinical significance, echocardiogram findings, and systemic PDA effects, and one that recommends the optimal treatment course based on these findings, would be helpful in medical management of neonatal PDAs in the ELBW (extremely low birth weight) population.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

208

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Mesa, Arizona, United States, 85202
        • Banner Cardon Children's Medical Center
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85006
        • Banner - University Medical Center Phoenix

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Approximately 100-125 infants ≤1000g with a PDA are born or admitted each year between the BUMCP and CCMC NICUs. Including ELBW neonates over a space of four years will yield a sample size of up to 500, which should be large enough determine how effective the PDA algorithm has been.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients admitted to the BUMCP and CCMC NICUs with a birth weight ≤1000g and an echocardiogram-confirmed PDA, regardless of GA.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have serious comorbidities that are not directly related to their symptomatic PDA will be excluded (chromosomal abnormalities, serious kidney pathology, other hemodynamically significant heart defects, or serious comorbidities at the researcher's discretion). This will allow the researchers to better determine the efficacy of the treatment algorithm, without the results being confounded by unusual comorbidities.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To determine whether using a standardized PDA treatment algorithm improves clinical outcomes in the ELBW population (≤1000 g) with a documented PDA.
Time Frame: 30 days
- Number of ventilation days {requirement of respiratory support of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or greater}
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To determine whether using a standardized treatment algorithm helps prevent undesirable side effects from symptomatic PDAs.
Time Frame: 30 days
Average length of hospital stay
30 days
To determine whether using a standardized treatment algorithm helps prevent undesirable side effects from symptomatic PDAs.
Time Frame: 30 days
Average weight gain (g/day from birth to discharge)
30 days
To determine whether using a standardized treatment algorithm helps prevent undesirable side effects from symptomatic PDAs.
Time Frame: 30 days
Incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD)
30 days
To determine whether using a standardized treatment algorithm helps prevent undesirable side effects from symptomatic PDAs.
Time Frame: 30 days
Incidence of pulmonary effusion/hemorrhage
30 days
To determine whether using a standardized treatment algorithm helps prevent undesirable side effects from symptomatic PDAs.
Time Frame: 30 days
Incidence of NEC
30 days
To determine whether using a standardized treatment algorithm helps prevent undesirable side effects from symptomatic PDAs.
Time Frame: 30 days
Need for home oxygen (O2) (excluding for high altitude needs at home)
30 days
To determine whether using a standardized treatment algorithm helps prevent undesirable side effects from symptomatic PDAs.
Time Frame: 30 days
Mortality rate
30 days
To determine whether using a standardized treatment algorithm helps prevent undesirable side effects from symptomatic PDAs.
Time Frame: 30 days
Incidence of PDA ligation
30 days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
For the group of subjects born after the implementation of the PDA algorithm, a determination will be made as to if the algorithm was followed appropriately.
Time Frame: 30 days
Review of the subject's chart to determine if treatment algorithm was followed appropriately.
30 days
For the group of subjects born after the implementation of the PDA algorithm, a determination will be made as to if the algorithm was followed appropriately.
Time Frame: 30 days
Calculate compliance rate of algorithm among patients with PDAs.
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

July 27, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 17, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 8, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low; Birthweight, Extremely (999 Grams or Less)

Subscribe