- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04379843
The Efficacy of Implementing a Treatment Algorithm in Managing Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA) in the Extremely Low Birth Weight Neonatal Population.
August 31, 2021 updated by: Pediatrix
To evaluate whether utilizing a standardized patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) treatment algorithm in managing ELBW (extremely low birth weight) neonates ≤1000 grams (g) improves clinical outcomes and helps prevent undesirable side effects from PDAs.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Detailed Description
The treatment of PDAs (patent ductus arteriosus) in both the premature and term neonatal population has been the source of thorough research for decades.
Common treatment pathways include supportive care, pharmaceutical treatment (via indomethacin, ibuprofen, or acetaminophen), and surgical correction.
Many PDAs self-resolve, some are not detected to adulthood, and others may never be discovered.
However, determining which neonates with PDAs require pharmaceutical versus surgical management, and which can be managed with supportive care, can be difficult to differentiate.
A standardized neonatal PDA treatment algorithm, one that assesses clinical significance, echocardiogram findings, and systemic PDA effects, and one that recommends the optimal treatment course based on these findings, would be helpful in medical management of neonatal PDAs in the ELBW (extremely low birth weight) population.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
208
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Arizona
-
Mesa, Arizona, United States, 85202
- Banner Cardon Children's Medical Center
-
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85006
- Banner - University Medical Center Phoenix
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- ADULT
- OLDER_ADULT
- CHILD
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Approximately 100-125 infants ≤1000g with a PDA are born or admitted each year between the BUMCP and CCMC NICUs.
Including ELBW neonates over a space of four years will yield a sample size of up to 500, which should be large enough determine how effective the PDA algorithm has been.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients admitted to the BUMCP and CCMC NICUs with a birth weight ≤1000g and an echocardiogram-confirmed PDA, regardless of GA.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who have serious comorbidities that are not directly related to their symptomatic PDA will be excluded (chromosomal abnormalities, serious kidney pathology, other hemodynamically significant heart defects, or serious comorbidities at the researcher's discretion). This will allow the researchers to better determine the efficacy of the treatment algorithm, without the results being confounded by unusual comorbidities.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
To determine whether using a standardized PDA treatment algorithm improves clinical outcomes in the ELBW population (≤1000 g) with a documented PDA.
Time Frame: 30 days
|
- Number of ventilation days {requirement of respiratory support of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or greater}
|
30 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
To determine whether using a standardized treatment algorithm helps prevent undesirable side effects from symptomatic PDAs.
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Average length of hospital stay
|
30 days
|
|
To determine whether using a standardized treatment algorithm helps prevent undesirable side effects from symptomatic PDAs.
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Average weight gain (g/day from birth to discharge)
|
30 days
|
|
To determine whether using a standardized treatment algorithm helps prevent undesirable side effects from symptomatic PDAs.
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD)
|
30 days
|
|
To determine whether using a standardized treatment algorithm helps prevent undesirable side effects from symptomatic PDAs.
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Incidence of pulmonary effusion/hemorrhage
|
30 days
|
|
To determine whether using a standardized treatment algorithm helps prevent undesirable side effects from symptomatic PDAs.
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Incidence of NEC
|
30 days
|
|
To determine whether using a standardized treatment algorithm helps prevent undesirable side effects from symptomatic PDAs.
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Need for home oxygen (O2) (excluding for high altitude needs at home)
|
30 days
|
|
To determine whether using a standardized treatment algorithm helps prevent undesirable side effects from symptomatic PDAs.
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Mortality rate
|
30 days
|
|
To determine whether using a standardized treatment algorithm helps prevent undesirable side effects from symptomatic PDAs.
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Incidence of PDA ligation
|
30 days
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
For the group of subjects born after the implementation of the PDA algorithm, a determination will be made as to if the algorithm was followed appropriately.
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Review of the subject's chart to determine if treatment algorithm was followed appropriately.
|
30 days
|
|
For the group of subjects born after the implementation of the PDA algorithm, a determination will be made as to if the algorithm was followed appropriately.
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Calculate compliance rate of algorithm among patients with PDAs.
|
30 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
July 27, 2016
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
July 17, 2020
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
July 31, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 24, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 4, 2020
First Posted (ACTUAL)
May 8, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
September 1, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 31, 2021
Last Verified
August 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 591107730
- 591198726 (OTHER: MEDNAX CREQS)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Low; Birthweight, Extremely (999 Grams or Less)
-
Aljazeera HospitalKasr El Aini HospitalUnknown
-
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of CambridgeRecruitingPreterm Infant | Low; Birthweight, Extremely (999 Grams or Less) | Infant, NewbornUnited Kingdom
-
Outi AikioCompletedPrematurity; Extreme | Low Birthweight, Extremely (999 Grams or Less)Finland
-
University of Massachusetts, WorcesterEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...RecruitingPreterm Birth | Low; Birthweight, Extremely (999 Grams or Less)United States
-
Philips HealthcareMemorial Hospital of South BendWithdrawnStress | Preterm Birth | Growth Acceleration | Chronic Lung Disease | Satisfaction | Adverse Event | Low; Birthweight, Extremely (999 Grams or Less) | Neonatal InfectionUnited States
-
Philips HealthcareChildren's Hospital and Medical Center, Omaha, NebraskaWithdrawnStress | Preterm Birth | Growth Acceleration | Chronic Lung Disease | Satisfaction | Adverse Event | Low; Birthweight, Extremely (999 Grams or Less) | Neonatal InfectionUnited States
-
Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo General HospitalFakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia; Dinas Kesehatan DKI JakartaRecruitingPregnancy Complications | Preterm Birth | Preeclampsia | Asphyxia Neonatorum | Low; Birthweight, Extremely (999 Grams or Less) | Maternal Death | IUGR | Neonatal Death | Pregnancy Hemorrhage | Intrauterine InfectionIndonesia
-
Abant Izzet Baysal UniversityHacettepe UniversityUnknownCerebral Palsy | Down Syndrome | Premature Infants | Spina Bifida | Metabolic Disorders | Low; Birthweight, Extremely (999 Grams or Less)
-
PHCC LPCompletedPreterm Birth | Low Birth Weight <2500 Grams | Verylow Birthweight <1500 GramsUnited States
-
Singapore General HospitalCompletedVery Low Birth Weight Infant | Neonatal Hypoglycemia | Extremely Low Birth Weight | Extreme Prematurity,Extremely Low BirthweightSingapore