A Study of APL-9 in Adults With Mild to Moderate ARDS Due to COVID-19

March 21, 2022 updated by: Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Vehicle-Controlled, Multicenter, Parallel-Group Study of APL-9 in Mild to Moderate Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Due to COVID-19

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of APL-9 in adults with mild to moderate ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome) caused by COVID-19 who are hospitalized and require supplemental oxygen therapy with or without mechanical ventilation.

It is thought that COVID-19 activates the complement system, part of the immune system that responds to infection or tissue damage, and increases inflammation in the lungs. APL-9 has been designed to inhibit or block activation of part of the complement pathway, and potentially reduce inflammation in the lungs.

Part 1 of the study is open-label to evaluate safety; all participants will receive APL-9 plus standard of care. Part 2 of the study is double-blind, randomized; participants will receive either APL-9 or the vehicle-control plus standard of care.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

72

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Paraná
      • Campina Grande Do Sul, Paraná, Brazil, 83430-000
        • Hospital Angelina Caron
    • Rio Grande Do Sul
      • Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil, 90020-090
        • Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericordia de Porto Alegre
      • Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil, 91530-001
        • Hospital Sao Lucas Da Pucrs
    • Sao Paulo
      • Santo André, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 09190-615
        • Hospital Estadual Mario Covas
      • São Bernardo Do Campo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 0917-090
        • CEMEC - Centro Multidisciplinar de Estudos Clínicos LTDA EPP
      • São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 01323-020
        • Hospital Alemao Oswaldo Cruz
      • São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 08270-120
        • Hospital Santa Marcelina
    • São Paulo
      • Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil, 18618-686
        • UPECLIN - Unidade de Pesquisa Clínica da Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu - FMB/UNESP
    • California
      • Fresno, California, United States, 93701
        • University of California at San Francisco - Fresno
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94115
        • California Pacific Medical Center
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville Beach, Florida, United States, 32250
        • Baptist Medical Center Beaches
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 40241
        • Westchester General Hospital
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine
      • Maywood, Illinois, United States, 60153
        • Loyola University Medical Center
    • Indiana
      • Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States, 46804
        • Lutheran Health Physicians
    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242
        • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40207
        • Norton Women's and Children's Hospital
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40217
        • Norton Audobon Hospital
    • Louisiana
      • Alexandria, Louisiana, United States, 71301
        • Cambridge Medical Trials
    • Michigan
      • Southfield, Michigan, United States, 48075
        • Ascension Providence Hospital
    • New Jersey
      • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08903
        • Rutgers University - Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14203
        • University at Buffalo
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University
    • Texas
      • Temple, Texas, United States, 76508
        • Texas A&M College of Medicine - Scott and White

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be at least 18 years of age at time of informed consent
  • Diagnosis of active SARS CoV 2 infection using viral RNA or viral antigen within 7 days of screening
  • Respiratory failure requiring oxygen supplementation or either invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation with PaO2/FiO2 ratio >100 mm Hg. Respiratory failure cannot be fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors, or other immunomodulators within 3 months prior to study enrollment (however, treatment with convalescent plasma, steroids, IL-6 inhibitors, and antiviral agents is NOT excluded)
  • Active bacterial, fungal, or parasitic infection
  • History of neuromuscular degenerative disease (eg, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, or multiple sclerosis)
  • Current participation in an interventional clincial trial
  • Subjects who have, at screening, been on mechanical ventilation for >7 days Have evidence of kidney and liver failure at screening
  • Have a hereditary complement deficiency
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 180 mg APL-9 IV plus SOC
Complement (C3) Inhibitor
Placebo Comparator: Isotonic saline plus SOC
Normal saline of equal volume to active arm

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Subjects Who Experienced Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
Time Frame: From the first dose of study drug and up to 30 (+7) days after the last dose of study drug. Part 1: Day 1 up to Day 44; Part 2: Day 1 up to Day 58
TEAEs were defined as those adverse events that developed or worsened in severity after initiation of the first dose of study drug and up to 30 (+7) days beyond the last dose of study drug. A serious TEAE was any TEAE or suspected adverse reaction that, in the view of either the Investigator or Sponsor, resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; is life threatening; inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; a persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions; or a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
From the first dose of study drug and up to 30 (+7) days after the last dose of study drug. Part 1: Day 1 up to Day 44; Part 2: Day 1 up to Day 58

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital Length of Stay
Time Frame: Part 2: Day 1 up to Day 58
Hospital length of stay was defined as randomization date to hospital discharge. For subjects with death of any cause or withdrawal of study participation, hospital length of stay was imputed with the longest hospital length of stay observed in the study. Median hospital length of stay was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Part 2: Day 1 up to Day 58
Overall Survival
Time Frame: Part 2: Day 1 up to Day 58 (until the safety follow-up assessment 30 days after last study treatment [+7 days])
Overall survival was defined as randomization date to death of any cause, censored at the last day known to be alive. Median overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Part 2: Day 1 up to Day 58 (until the safety follow-up assessment 30 days after last study treatment [+7 days])
Change From Baseline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score Over Time
Time Frame: Part 2: Baseline (Day 1) and Days 3, 5, 7, 11, 15 and end of treatment (EOT) visit (up to Day 21)
The SOFA score is an aggregate score based on objective measures of 6 organ systems: respiratory, coagulation, hepatic, cardiovascular, neurologic, and renal. The minimum value is 0 and maximum value is 24. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes. A subject with a SOFA score of zero was defined as being free of organ failure.
Part 2: Baseline (Day 1) and Days 3, 5, 7, 11, 15 and end of treatment (EOT) visit (up to Day 21)
Total Duration of Mechanical Ventilation
Time Frame: Part 2: Day 1 up to Day 58
Total duration of mechanical ventilation was calculated from the randomization date and was defined as days on mechanical ventilation during the study participation. For subjects with death of any cause (or withdrawal of study participation), total duration of mechanical ventilation was imputed with the longest duration observed in the study. Any subject who was not on mechanical ventilation at the randomization date was excluded. Median total duration of mechanical ventilation was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Part 2: Day 1 up to Day 58
Total Duration of Oxygen Therapy
Time Frame: Part 2: Day 1 up to Day 58
Total duration of oxygen therapy was calculated from randomization date and was defined as days on mechanical ventilation or supplemental oxygen during the study participation. For subjects with death of any cause (or withdrawal of study participation), total duration of oxygen therapy was imputed with the longest duration observed in the study. Any subject who was not on mechanical ventilation or supplemental oxygen at the randomization date was excluded. Median total duration of oxygen therapy was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Part 2: Day 1 up to Day 58
Serum Concentration of APL-9 Over Time
Time Frame: Part 1: Day 1 (pre- and post-dose) and Days 3, 5 and 7 (including EOT visit); Part 2: Day 1 (pre- and post-dose) and Days 3, 5, 7, 11, 15 and EOT visit (up to Day 21)
To evaluate pharmacokinetics (PK), blood samples were collected at pre-specified timepoints and serum concentrations of APL-9 were determined. Blood was collected 3 times on Day 1: prior to the initial infusion, as soon as possible following the initial infusion (within 5-10 minutes) prior to the continuous infusion, and at 2 hours after the beginning of the continuous infusion. Blood was then collected once daily between 1-2 hours after the first dose on Days 3, 5, 7, 11 (if treatment was ongoing), Day 15 (if treatment was ongoing) and at the EOT visit.
Part 1: Day 1 (pre- and post-dose) and Days 3, 5 and 7 (including EOT visit); Part 2: Day 1 (pre- and post-dose) and Days 3, 5, 7, 11, 15 and EOT visit (up to Day 21)
Change From Baseline at EOT Visit in Biomarkers of Complement Activation: Components C3 and C4
Time Frame: Part 1: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 7); Part 2: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 21)
To evaluate pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters, blood samples were collected at pre-specified timepoints. Results are presented for change from baseline to EOT visit for complement biomarkers C3 and C4.
Part 1: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 7); Part 2: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 21)
Change From Baseline at EOT Visit in Biomarkers of Complement Activation: Components C3a, C4a, C5a and Terminal Complement Complex (TCC)
Time Frame: Part 1: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 7); Part 2: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 21)
To evaluate PD parameters, blood samples were collected at pre-specified timepoints. Results are presented for change from baseline to EOT visit for complement biomarkers C3a, C4a, C5a and TCC.
Part 1: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 7); Part 2: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 21)
Change From Baseline at EOT Visit in Biomarkers of Complement Activation: Complement Bb
Time Frame: Part 1: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 7); Part 2: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 21)
To evaluate PD parameters, blood samples were collected at pre-specified timepoints. Results are presented for change from baseline to EOT visit for complement biomarker Bb, a marker of alternative pathway activation.
Part 1: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 7); Part 2: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 21)
Change From Baseline at EOT Visit in Biomarkers of Complement Activation: Alternative Complement Pathway Hemolytic Activity (AH50)
Time Frame: Part 1: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (Day 7); Part 2: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 21)
To evaluate PD parameters, blood samples were collected at pre-specified timepoints. Results are presented for change from baseline to EOT visit for complement biomarker AH50.
Part 1: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (Day 7); Part 2: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 21)
Change From Baseline at EOT Visit in Biomarkers of Coagulopathy: Reticulocytes
Time Frame: Part 1: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (Day 7); Part 2: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 21)
To evaluate PD parameters, blood samples were collected at pre-specified timepoints. Results are presented for change from baseline to EOT visit for the coagulation biomarker reticulocytes. Percentage (%) of reticulocytes was calculated as (Number of Reticulocytes / Number of Red Blood Cells) X 100.
Part 1: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (Day 7); Part 2: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 21)
Change From Baseline at EOT Visit in Biomarkers of Coagulopathy: Schistocytes
Time Frame: Part 1: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (Day 7); Part 2: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 21)
To evaluate PD parameters, blood samples were collected at pre-specified timepoints. Results are presented for change from baseline to EOT visit for the coagulation biomarker schistocytes.
Part 1: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (Day 7); Part 2: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 21)
Change From Baseline at EOT Visit in Biomarkers of Coagulopathy: Lactate Dehydrogenase
Time Frame: Part 1: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (Day 7); Part 2: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 21)
To evaluate PD parameters, blood samples were collected at pre-specified timepoints. Results are presented for change from baseline to EOT visit for the coagulation biomarker lactate dehydrogenase.
Part 1: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (Day 7); Part 2: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 21)
Change From Baseline at EOT Visit in Biomarkers of Coagulopathy: D-Dimer and Ferritin
Time Frame: Part 1: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (Day 7); Part 2: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 21)
To evaluate PD parameters, blood samples were collected at pre-specified timepoints. Results are presented for change from baseline to EOT visit for the coagulation biomarkers D-dimer and ferritin.
Part 1: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (Day 7); Part 2: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 21)
Change From Baseline at EOT Visit in Biomarkers of Coagulopathy: Haptoglobin and Fibrinogen
Time Frame: Part 1: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (Day 7); Part 2: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 21)
To evaluate PD parameters, blood samples were collected at pre-specified timepoints. Results are presented for change from baseline to EOT visit for the coagulation biomarkers haptoglobin and fibrinogen.
Part 1: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (Day 7); Part 2: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 21)
Change From Baseline at EOT Visit in Biomarkers of Inflammation: C-reactive Protein (CRP)
Time Frame: Part 1: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (Day 7); Part 2: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 21)
To evaluate PD parameters, blood samples were collected at pre-specified timepoints. Results are presented for change from baseline to EOT visit for the inflammatory cytokine CRP.
Part 1: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (Day 7); Part 2: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 21)
Change From Baseline at EOT Visit in Biomarkers of Inflammation: Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNFα), Interleukin-1-beta (IL-1β) and Interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Time Frame: Part 1: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (Day 7); Part 2: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 21)
To evaluate PD parameters, blood samples were collected at pre-specified timepoints. Results are presented for change from baseline to EOT visit for the inflammatory cytokines TNFα, IL-1β and IL-6.
Part 1: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (Day 7); Part 2: Baseline (Day 1) and EOT visit (up to Day 21)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 28, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 13, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 13, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome

Clinical Trials on APL-9

Subscribe