NUC in Preventing HBV Reactivation in HCV/HBV Co-infected Patients Receiving DAA for CHC

July 1, 2020 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

Role of Nucleoside Analogue in Preventing Clinical Reactivation of HBV in HCV/HBV Co-infected Patients Receiving DAA Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis C

HBV reactivation is common in HCV/HBV coinfected patients receiving DAA therapy for chronic hepatitis C. How to prevent HBV reactivation remains unclear. In this trial, we aim to investigate whether prophylactic nucleos(t)ide analogue (NUC) at the start of DAA could prevent HBV reactivation or not. And whether prolonged NUC prophylaxis (24 weeks) would be better than 12-week prophylaxis. This will be a three-arm, open-label, randomized, active controlled, study. Totally, 60 HBV/HCV co-infected treatment-naïve or treatment-experienced patients without decompensated liver cirrhosis will be included in this study. Group 1 patients (n=20) will receive 12-week ETV from the start of DAA therapy. Group 2 patients (n=20) will receive 24-week ETV from the start of DAA till 12 weeks after end of DAA. Group 3 patients (n=20) will not receive ETV during the period of DAA and will serve as controls. The rate of HBV reactivation and clinical reactivation will be compared among 3 groups of patients. Expected outcomes: The rate of HBV reactivation and clinical reactivation will be lower in the ETV prophylaxis group, and will be the lowest in the group receiving 24-week ETV prophylaxis.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

We will determine the incidence of virologic and clinical reactivation of HBV during DAA treatment for CHC, in two prophylactic groups versus control group. We will also examine whether extending the duration of prophylactic NUC would be more beneficial than the 3-month prophylaxis regimen.

Patients with the following criteria will be enrolled: age ≥20 years; anti-HCV positive and HCV RNA >1000 IU/ml; any HCV genotype; all received 12 weeks of DAA treatment; treatment naïve or experienced of pegylated interferon/ribavirin; concurrent HBV infection which is defined by positive HBsAg for at least 6 months. Patients with the following criteria will be excluded: history of treatment regimen that included any kind of direct antiviral agents; presence of other etiology of chronic hepatitis including HIV, autoimmune hepatitis, NASH, etc; uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (Hba1c >8.5); current evidence or suspicion of malignancy; severe cardiovascular or other severe comorbid diseases; autoimmune disorders; presence of liver cirrhosis clinically or pathologically; any one of following hematology or biochemical or clinical abnormalities: AST/ALT >10x ULN, Albumin <3.5g/dL, Bilirubin >2.5mg/dL, eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73m2, prothrombin time prolongation >4 sec or INR >1.7, platelet count <100 x 103 uL, and history or presence of ascites or hepatic encephalopathy; child-bearing age women without the willing to contraceptive control; and pregnant women or lactating women.

Briefly, 60 HCV/HBV coinfected patients will be enrolled and randomized to receive 12-week DAA regimen for reimbursed for the the treatment of patients with CHC in Taiwan.

Entecavir (0.5mg; ETV) 1 # daily will be used in the prophylactic group. Group 1 patients (n=20) will receive 12-week ETV from the start of DAA therapy. Group 2 patients (n=20) will receive 24-week ETV from the start of DAA till 12 weeks after end of DAA. Group 3 patients (n=20) will not receive ETV during the period of DAA and serve as controls. The rate of HBV reactivation and clinical reactivation will be compared among 3 groups of patients.

The primary endpoint will be the incidence of virologic and clinical reactivation of HBV during DAA treatment for CHC. Secondary objectives include the rate of HBV virologic and clinical reactivation between 12-week versus 24-week entecavir (ETV) prophylaxis during and after DAA treatment; the profiles of serum HBV DNA/qHBsAg during and after DAA treatment; and sustained virological response at post-DAA treatment 12 weeks (SVR12).

The data will be expressed as percentages for category variables and as mean +- standard deviation for continuous variables. Category variables will be evaluated by Chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test will be applied for comparison of the continuous variables. Multivariate analysis will be used to identify factors that are associated with HBV reactivation. A p value less than 0.05 is considered to be significant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
        • Recruiting
        • TC Chen
      • Taipei City, Taiwan, 100
        • Recruiting
        • National Taiwan University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥20 years;
  2. Anti-HCV positive and HCV RNA >1000 IU/ml;
  3. Any HCV genotype; all received 12 weeks of DAA treatment.
  4. Treatment naïve or experienced of pegylated interferon/ribavirin;
  5. Concurrent HBV infection which is defined by positive HBsAg for at least 6 months.

Exclusion criteria

  1. History of treatment regimen that included any kind of direct antiviral agents;
  2. Presence of other etiology of chronic hepatitis including HIV, autoimmune hepatitis, NASH, etc;
  3. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (Hba1c >8.5);
  4. Current evidence or suspicion of malignancy;
  5. Severe cardiovascular or other severe comorbid diseases;
  6. Autoimmune disorders;
  7. Presence of liver cirrhosis clinically or pathologically;
  8. Any one of following hematology or biochemical or clinical abnormalities:

    AST/ALT >10x ULN, Albumin <3.5g/dL, Bilirubin >2.5mg/dL, eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73m2, prothrombin time prolongation >4 sec or INR >1.7, platelet count <100 x 103 uL, and history or presence of ascites or hepatic encephalopathy.

  9. Child-bearing age women without the willing to contraceptive control; pregnant women or lactating women.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: FACTORIAL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Entecavir 0.5mg daily for 24 weeks
Entecavir will be delivered for 24-week and will be the experimental arm
Entecavir 0.5mg for 24 weeks will be delivered
Other Names:
  • Prophylaxis arm 1
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Entecavir 0.5mg daily for 12 weeks
12-week entecavir will be served as active comparator
Entecavir for 12 weeks will be delivered and serve as the active comparator arm
Other Names:
  • Prophylaxis arm 2
NO_INTERVENTION: Control
Control group does not receive prophylactic ETV

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HBV virologic and clinical reactivation rates
Time Frame: 72 weeks
The primary endpoint will be the incidence of virologic and clinical reactivation of HBV during DAA treatment for CHC.
72 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HBV reactivation rate: 12-week prophylaxis versus 24-week prophylaxis
Time Frame: 72 weeks
12 weeks or 24 weeks of ETV prophylaxis in the control of HBV activity during and after DAA treatment
72 weeks
Profiles of serum HBV DNA/qHBsAg during and after DAA treatment.
Time Frame: 72 weeks
The profiles of HBV DNA and qHBsAg will be compared among 3 study groups
72 weeks
Sustained virological response at post-DAA treatment 12 weeks (SVR12)
Time Frame: 72 weeks
The SVR12 will be compared among 3 study groups
72 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chun-Jen Liu, MDPHD, Department of Internal Medicine, NTUH

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 28, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 28, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 2, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 201807069MINB

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HBV/HCV Co-infection

Clinical Trials on 24-week Entecavir

3
Subscribe