Harambee: Integrated Community-based HIV/NCD Care & Microfinance Groups in Kenya

October 5, 2025 updated by: Omar Galarraga, PhD, Brown University

The objective of this project is to demonstrate the effectiveness and longer-term sustainability of a differentiated care delivery model for improving HIV treatment outcomes. The central hypothesis is that the integration of community-based HIV and NCD care with group microfinance will improve retention in care and rates of viral suppression (VS) among people living with HIV (PLHIV) in Kenya via two mechanisms: improved household economic status and easier access to care.

The specific aims are as follows:

  1. To evaluate the extent to which integrated community-based HIV care with group microfinance affects retention in care and viral suppression among n=900 PLHIV in rural western Kenya using a cluster randomized intervention design of at least n=40 existing (fully HIV+) microfinance groups to receive either: (A) integrated community-based HIV and NCD care or (B) usual facility-based care. Data from the two trial arms will be augmented with a matched contemporaneous control group of n=300 patients receiving usual facility-based care and not involved in microfinance (group C), comparing outcomes in groups A, B and C. The hypothesize is that A > B > C in terms of viral suppression and retention in care.
  2. To identify specific mechanisms through which microfinance and integrated community-based care impact viral suppression. Using a mixed methods approach, the study will characterize the mechanisms of effect on patient outcomes. Investigators will conduct quantitative mediation analysis to examine two main mediating pathways (household economic conditions and easier access to care), as well as exploratory mechanisms (food security, social support, HIV- related stigma). Investigators will also use qualitative methods and multi-stakeholder panels to contextualize implementation of the intervention.
  3. To assess the cost-effectiveness of microfinance and integrated community-based care delivery to maximize future policy and practice relevance of this promising intervention strategy. The working hypothesis is that the differentiated model will be cost-effective in terms of cost per HIV suppressed person-time, cost per patient retained in care, and cost per disability-adjusted life year saved.

The main expected outcomes will be rigorous evidence of effectiveness, mechanisms and cost-effectiveness of a differentiated model for achieving the last key step in the HIV care continuum. These results are expected to have an important positive impact in terms of improved, high-quality services that address known individual and structural barriers to care and promote long-term sustainability of care for PLHIV in rural settings with high HIV prevalence.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Eldoret, Kenya
        • Moi University/ Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age or older at study baseline
  • HIV-positive
  • Have received any care through AMPATH since 2010
  • Initiated ART at least 6 months prior to study baseline
  • Have participated in at least one microfinance group meeting in the prior 12 months at study baseline (for Study Arms A & B)
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently participating in the BIGPIC study
  • Unable to provide informed consent for participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Microfinance with Integrated Community-based Care
A minimum of 20 microfinance groups with approximately n=450 participants will be randomized to receive the ICB intervention.
During quarterly intervention visits, a clinical officer (CO) travels to the location of the microfinance group meeting. The CO meets privately with each patient one-on-one, provides brief medical consultations, and distributes ART and other medications for diabetes and hypertension as needed. ART medicines are provided at no cost to patients from AMPATH HIV pharmacies; medications for diabetes and hypertension are dispensed to patients from AMPATH Revolving Fund Pharmacies at a standardized price. The CO conducts point-of-care laboratory testing if medically indicated. Every 6 months, the CO conducts a more intensive HIV clinical evaluation. The cost of point-of-care tests administered at study baseline and study end line are covered by the study. Additional tests during the trial are paid for by the patient. COs make referrals to facilities for emergency or acute care needs. Each visit includes a health education discussion conducted in a group.

Group microfinance uses a client-driven model that involves community savings groups where members mobilize and manage their own savings, provide interest-bearing loans to group members, offer a limited form of financial insurance, and contribute to a social fund that is used for income-generating activities and in cases of emergency or welfare issues of group members.

For this study, group microfinance will refer to existing, active AMPATH Group Integrated Savings for Empowerment (GISE) microfinance groups with a majority of group members who are AMPATH HIV patients and have disclosed their HIV status. Groups will be considered active if the group was formed at least 6 months prior to study baseline, is consistently meeting as scheduled, and is actively engaging in saving and loaning.

Active Comparator: Microfinance with Usual (Facility-Based) Care
A minimum of 20 microfinance groups with approximately n=450 participants will be randomized to continue to receive standard of care from an AMPATH-supported rural health facility.

Group microfinance uses a client-driven model that involves community savings groups where members mobilize and manage their own savings, provide interest-bearing loans to group members, offer a limited form of financial insurance, and contribute to a social fund that is used for income-generating activities and in cases of emergency or welfare issues of group members.

For this study, group microfinance will refer to existing, active AMPATH Group Integrated Savings for Empowerment (GISE) microfinance groups with a majority of group members who are AMPATH HIV patients and have disclosed their HIV status. Groups will be considered active if the group was formed at least 6 months prior to study baseline, is consistently meeting as scheduled, and is actively engaging in saving and loaning.

No Intervention: Usual (Facility-Based) Care without Microfinance
A total of n=300 participants who receive care at an AMPATH health facility and who are not involved in microfinance will serve as frequency-matched contemporaneous controls. These participants will be actively followed over the 18-months of the trial.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HIV-1 RNA Viral Load Suppression at 18-months
Time Frame: 18 months
Participants whose 18-month viral load assessment occurred before January 1, 2023 were considered suppressed if their viral load was <400 copies/mL. Following changes to Kenya's national HIV monitoring cutoffs that occurred during the trial, patients whose 18- month viral load assessment was on or after January 1, 2023 were considered suppressed if their viral load was <200 copies/mL.
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
Time Frame: Between baseline and 18 months
Change in systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) at 18 months as compared to baseline
Between baseline and 18 months
Retention in Care Each Quarter During 18-months of Follow-up
Time Frame: Between baseline and 18 months
A participant was considered retained in HIV care if they attended at least one HIV care visit in each quarter a visit was scheduled (always retained in care), where attending a visit was defined as attending a visit within +/- 28 days of their scheduled visit date (following AMPATH care protocols). Patients who had no visit(s) scheduled in a given quarter were considered retained for that quarter.
Between baseline and 18 months
Change in Random Blood Sugar (mmol/L)
Time Frame: Between baseline and 18 months
Change in random blood sugar (mmol/L) at 18 months as compared to baseline
Between baseline and 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 26, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 21, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 6, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 31, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Materials generated under this project will be disseminated according to University and NIH policies regarding data sharing. Aggregate-level data collected in this collaboration will ultimately be available for public use. Opportunities for secondary analyses will be available following completion of the three-year project and publication of the main study findings. These findings will be available to the public through scientific meetings and peer-reviewed journals, as well as through a structured policy dissemination process.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Integrated Community-Based (ICB) Care

Subscribe