Fetal Exposure to Cannabinoids: Exposure, Methylation and Neurodevelopmental Effects

September 20, 2023 updated by: University of Arkansas

Cannabis is a very popular drug for both recreational and medicinal use. An estimated 20% of adults in the United States report using cannabis in the past month, and this number continues to increase each year. As of 2018, medical use of cannabis is legal in 33 states and the District of Columbia. Recreational use is legal in 10 states, and it is decriminalized in 15 states. Hemp-derived cannabidiol (CBD) is legal in all states. Due to the rapidly changing legal status across the country, the demand for cannabinoids (which are specific components of cannabis), such as THC and CBD, are also rapidly increasing. Studies have shown a significant increase in marijuana use among pregnant and parenting women following state-wide legalization, and this could have significant implications for the health and development of children born to these women.

While there is a growing effort to evaluate the health effects of cannabinoids, especially during pregnancy, there is still relatively little known about the long term neurodevelopmental outcomes, such as emotional regulation, attention, and intelligence, in children born to mothers who used any sort of cannabinoid during pregnancy. The few studies that have been performed that look at longer term outcomes were epidemiological and self-reported in nature, and cannot accurately correlate neurodevelopmental outcomes with precise dosage and exposure levels during pregnancy.

Importantly, the THC content of marijuana has dramatically increased in recent years, with THC concentration and purity being the highest in history. It is estimated that cannabis potency has increased 3-fold over the past 2 decades. Many of the previous studies examining prenatal cannabis use and fetal outcomes reflected lower potency cannabis, which is not relevant to today's exposure levels. Additionally, there are no published studies to-date that evaluate fetal exposure to CBD or neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants who were exposed to CBD prenatally.

Finally, the causes behind possible neurodevelopmental changes in children exposed to cannabis prenatally have not been thoroughly explored, particularly in humans. It is thought that epigenetic modifications, or changes to DNA, may play a role in changes to the developing fetal brain after prenatal exposure to cannabis, but few studies have evaluated this quantitatively in humans.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Cannabis is a very popular drug for both recreational and medicinal use. An estimated 20% of adults in the United States report using cannabis in the past month, and this number continues to increase each year. As of 2018, medicinal use of cannabis is legal in 33 states and the District of Columbia. Recreational use is legal in 10 states, and it is decriminalized in 15 states. Hemp-derived cannabidiol (CBD) is legal in all states. Due to the rapidly changing legal status across the country, the demand for tetrahydrocannabinoid (THC) and CBD products is also rapidly increasing. Studies have shown a significant increase in marijuana use among pregnant and parenting women following state-wide legalization, and this could have significant implications for the health and development of children born to these women.

Despite its widespread use, and increased interests in THC for medical treatment, significant gaps exist in the investigator's scientific knowledge of the pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of THC and its metabolites. When inhaled, THC and CBD reach maximum concentrations within seconds. Bioavailability varies widely and is a function of inhalation time, number, interval, and duration of puffs, as well as within product variability. Importantly, smokers have greater bioavailability of THC than non-smokers. When THC and CBD are orally consumed, the bioavailability is relatively low (< 20%). However, the lipophilicity of both THC and CBD make these compounds of great interest with respect to tissue distribution. CBD is more lipophilic than THC and thus more likely to be absorbed with topic application. THC is known to cross the placenta and can reach the fetus]. The metabolism of both THC and CBD is complex. Following absorption, THC and CBD are rapidly distributed to tissues with high blood flow. Metabolism occurs in the liver via CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4, as well as the brain, small intestine, heart and lung. Primary metabolites undergo glucuronidation or conjugation reactions. The elimination half-lives are prolonged due to the deposition of drug and metabolites in fat.

Some previous epidemiological studies have shown that children born to mothers who report using THC during their pregnancy have a higher prevalence of neurodevelopmental and behavioral abnormalities. While these studies are sparse, there have been some studies that follow longitudinal cohorts worldwide. These epidemiological, survey-based studies have reported an increase in executive functioning deficits in infants who were exposed to THC in utero. These studies have also shown an increase in attention problems and hyperactivity in these children during early childhood and later adolescence. However, these studies have reported inconsistent outcomes. Some have reported negative effects on cognitive or executive functioning, and others have reported no significant changes. One possibility for these discrepancies is that survey-based epidemiological studies do not accurately capture the exact levels of fetal exposure due to the unreliable nature of self-reporting, making it difficult to accurately correlate prenatal exposure levels to neurodevelopment. This makes the need for a well-designed, quantitative exposure study that is followed by longitudinal neurodevelopmental outcome measurement imperative to determining true correlations between prenatal THC use and developmental outcomes in children.

It has also previously been established that cannabis use during pregnancy can be detrimental to the developing fetus. Prenatal use of THC has been shown to cause low birth weight in the absence of any change in neonatal length or head circumference, as well as increased tremors and disrupted sleep patterns. It has also been correlated with an increased need for placement in the neonatal intensive care unit. In addition to human studies, animal studies have shown changes in the endocannabinoid system (ECS) in the fetal brain during development. The ECS is present in the developing brain from the time of 5 weeks gestation, and is required for proliferation, differentiation, and migration of neurons. Any changes to this system during development could have important implications for further neural development. Several studies have observed changes in postsynaptic target selectivity, differentiation of developing axons, and disruption of position in the ECS in animal fetuses that were exposed to THC in utero. These central nervous system alterations could potentially point to long-term neurodevelopmental changes in children born to mothers who used cannabis during pregnancy. However, while animal studies are able to report exact dosing levels, animal models of prenatal cannabinoid use often do not accurately reflect human use.

While some detrimental effects to the fetus following prenatal cannabis use have been observed in both animal models and human studies, there remains the mechanistic question of what is causing these changes. Some studies have proposed epigenetic reprogramming that may occur in the mothers and the babies following prenatal cannabis use. Prior studies have focused on the effects of prenatal cannabis use increasing the likelihood of the children's substance abuse later in life, and have found positive correlations to DNA methylation and histone modification in these cases. Additionally, it has been shown that paternal cannabis use alters DNA methylation in sperm of rats and humans, which could also have important implications for development. However, to-date, there have not been any studies correlating epigenetic changes and neurodevelopmental changes in infants prenatally exposed to cannabis.

Additionally, many of the prior human studies were done at a time when THC content in marijuana was not as high as is in today's market, which could have major implications for actual exposure levels in the fetus. The initial studies that evaluated the effects of prenatal cannabis use on fetal outcomes were done in the early 1990s, at a time when average THC potency in seized marijuana in the United States was approximately 4%. The most recently reported potency of seized illicit cannabis plant material is approximately 12%. Additionally, the ratio of psychoactive THC content to non-psychoactive cannabidiol content has increased from approximately 14 to 80 between 1995 and 2014. These factors suggest a need for more updated studies that examine the effects of current high potency levels of fetal exposure to cannabis, as an increase in potency may have greater effects on the developing fetus.

While there have been some prior studies measuring the effects of fetal exposure to THC specifically, there have been no studies to-date that have evaluated the effects of CBD exposure on the developing fetus. CBD (also known as hemp) supposedly lacks psychoactive THC components, making it legal, widely available, and generally perceived to be safe.CBD is touted as a treatment for a number of conditions, including depression, anxiety, pain, and cancer. These factors, in addition to strong marketing campaigns, have most likely caused an increase in prenatal CBD use in recent years. A recent study conducted in mice found that CBD activates a large range of CYPP450 enzymes. While these data are preliminary, CYPP450 activation raises the concern of drug-drug interactions and suggests that biologic activity of CBD is not fully understood. However, there are no published studies evaluating the effects of prenatal CBD use on fetal outcomes or neurodevelopment. Additionally, many CBD products have been shown to contain varying concentrations of CBD, or are contaminated with synthetic cannabinoids (e.g. K2, "spice") or THC. The investigators will establish the exact composition of the products the pregnant women are taking in order to properly evaluate potential exposure levels in the developing fetus. The investigators will then correlate that exposure with neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

72

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205
        • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Mothers who report use of THC and /or CBD and pregnant women who do not use THC or CBD. Babies will be enrolled (consent given by mothers) following birth.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women
  • Age 18 and older
  • Must plan to give birth at UAMS
  • Report regular (at least 3x per week) use of THC- and/or CBD-containing product anytime during pregnancy (for experimental groups). Women who discontinue use of marijuana and/or CBD during pregnancy will still be allowed in the study.
  • Pregnant women who do not use THC or CBD will be enrolled as controls.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any other illicit drug use during pregnancy
  • Plan to give birth anywhere other than UAMS

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Mothers who report use of THC with or without CBD
Mothers who report THC and CBD usage during the trimester month of pregnancy, at a frequency of at least three time per week. Information will be collected from mothers receiving their obstetrical care at UAMS and will include data on the exact products used and the frequency of use.
Mothers who report use of CBD only
Mothers who report CBD usage during the trimester month of pregnancy, at a frequency of at least three time per week. Information will be collected from mothers receiving their obstetrical care at UAMS and will include data on the exact products used and the frequency of use.
Control Mothers
Recruitment of pregnant women who do not use THC or CBD will be conducted using the Epic MyChart research participant recruitment tool

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
THC and CBD metabolite levels in maternal neonatal blood
Time Frame: Within three months prior to the estimated due date
Levels of THC and CBD metabolites will be measured in maternal blood following prenatal drug use. These levels will be measured via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Within three months prior to the estimated due date
THC and CBD metabolite level in umbilical cord blood
Time Frame: Immediately after birth
Levels of THC and CBD metabolites will be measured umbilical cord blood following prenatal drug use. These levels will be measured via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Immediately after birth
THC and CBD metabolite levels in neonatal blood
Time Frame: 24 hours after birth
Levels of THC and CBD metabolites will be measured in neonatal blood following prenatal drug use. These levels will be measured via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.
24 hours after birth
Infant motor, cognitive, and social development at 6 months of age using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months after birth
To measure infant neurodevelopment, we will use the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ). The ASQ measures 5 domains/scales of child development: communication, gross motor, fine motor, problem solving, and personal-social. Each scale ranges from 0 to 60, with lower scores being indicative of deficits or poor outcomes.
6 months after birth
Infant motor, cognitive, and social development at 12 months of age using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months after birth
To measure infant neurodevelopment, we will use the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ). The ASQ measures 5 domains/scales of child development: communication, gross motor, fine motor, problem solving, and personal-social. Each scale ranges from 0 to 60, with lower scores being indicative of deficits or poor outcomes.
12 months after birth
Infant motor, cognitive, and social development at 6 months of age using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development
Time Frame: 6 months after birth
To measure infant neurodevelopment, we will use the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. The Bayley Scales measures 5 domains of child development: adaptive behavior, cognitive, language, motor, and social-emotional. Each scale ranges from 40-160, with higher scores indicative of better outcomes.
6 months after birth
Infant motor, cognitive, and social development at 12 months of age using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development
Time Frame: 12 months after birth
To measure infant neurodevelopment, we will use the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. The Bayley Scales measures 5 domains of child development: adaptive behavior, cognitive, language, motor, and social-emotional. Each scale ranges from 40-160, with higher scores indicative of better outcomes.
12 months after birth
DNA methylation profiles in infants at 12 months of age
Time Frame: 12 months after birth
Buccal samples from infants at 12 months of age will be used to evaluate DNA methylation profiles.
12 months after birth

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stefanie Kennon McGill, Ph.D., University of Arkansas

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 26, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 239611

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fetal Exposure Timing Unspecified

3
Subscribe