OCT Angiography in the Glaucoma Diagnosis (OCTA)

April 26, 2023 updated by: Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph

OCT Angiography in the Glaucoma Diagnosis : A Multicenter Study

Glaucoma is a chronic degenerative disease of the optic nerve. It is the second cause of blindness worldwide and a frequent cause of irreversible blindness. In 2020, epidemic health authorities have predicted about 80 million glaucoma patients. Glaucoma can be treated by topical treatment (eye drops), laser or surgery. A premature diagnosis of glaucoma is very important to prevent irreversible blindness. Pachymetry, Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and visual fields exams are fundamental for the development of the glaucoma diagnosis. The severity of glaucoma is defined with Hodapp-Parrish-Andersen visual field criteria. According to these criteria, glaucoma can be classified as early (with average visual field deviation, MD, of 0 to -6 dB), moderate (MD of -6 to -12 dB) and severe (MD worse than -12 dB). The progression of glaucoma is being identified by the visual fields tests, and also by the progression of alterations in the optic nerve head. The visual fields tests are long and difficult (30 minutes). It is therefore important to create additional tests and anticipate the diagnosis, in order to avoid the irreversibility of glaucoma.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The OCT Angiography (OCTA) is a non-invasive technology, marketed since 2014, that uses OCT with infrared light, with no radiation nor side effects, to evaluate within seconds the vascularization of the fundus, retina and optic nerve head, which may be useful for the glaucoma diagnosis. A recent meta-analysis has shown a decrease of the vascular density (DV) in glaucoma, so that OCTA may be useful in the advanced diagnosis of glaucoma. However, the VD values obtained were different depending on the device. In addition, no studies with the OCT Triton (Topcon®) device were considered in the analysis. The authors suggested the development of dedicated software, which would allow the evaluation of VD with different devices for a more independent and valid assessment. On the other hand, recent studies show that the diagnostic capacity of OCTA may be superior to that of OCT, and that OCTA may be more useful in determining the severity of glaucoma than OCT. It is therefore necessary to evaluate the additional diagnostic tests whether they are non-invasive and whether it allow us to give a faster diagnosis.

This study is aimed at comparing the diagnostic utility of OCTA with standard complementary glaucoma examinations (OCT and CV).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

91

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75014
        • Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph
      • Saint-Martin-des-Champs, France, 50300
        • Polyclinique de la Baie

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient whose age ≥ 18 years
  • Patient consultant in the ophthalmology department of the Marie-Thérèse Health Center or the Polyclinique de la Baie
  • French speaking patient
  • Patient affiliated to a health insurance plan
  • Patient having given free, informed and express consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with another ophthalmological pathology or a history of ophthalmological pathology
  • Patient with a history of ophthalmic surgery except for uncomplicated cataract surgery
  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship
  • Patient deprived of liberty
  • Pregnant or lactating woman

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Case Group

The "Case" group corresponds to patients with glaucoma following the clinical criteria for glaucoma:

  • papilla excavation> 5/10 with altered ISNT rule, or neuro-retinal rhyme characteristic of glaucoma, or fiber alterations characteristic of glaucoma.
  • OCT with typical alterations (loss of the layer of nerve fibers or loss of these ganglion cells), loss of fibers typical of glaucoma.
  • Humphrey 24: 2 visual fields produced, reliable and typical of glaucoma.

The assignment to the "Cas" group will be carried out by an ophthalmologist specializing in glaucoma according to the following criteria:

- The intraocular pressure must be increased before the start of treatment (21 mmHg or more), except in cases of normal pressure glaucoma.

The additional examination corresponds to an OCTA alone leading to an extension of the duration of the consultation by 5 minutes.

The additional examination corresponds to an OCTA which is a non-invasive examination, without potential risks, without radiation, using infrared light.
Experimental: Control Groupe

The Control group corresponds to patients with no glaucoma, no suspicion or history of glaucoma, ocular hypertension, or alterations detected during the ophthalmological consultation.

Witnesses will be matched to cases by age (+/- 5 years) and gender.

For patients in this group, the additional examinations correspond to a visual field, an OCT and an OCTA leading to an extension of the duration of the consultation by 35 minutes.

The additional examinations correspond to:

  • OCTA which is a non-invasive examination, without potential risks, without radiation, using infrared light.
  • OCT: non-invasive examination, without potential risks, without radiation, using infrared light. The patient must sit in front of a screen and a contact is taken without contact in about ten seconds.
  • Visual field

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vascular density between the 2 groups
Time Frame: Day1
This outcome corresponds to percentage of vascularization of the optic papilla measured using OCTA.
Day1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Papilla supply according to severity of glaucoma
Time Frame: Day 1
This outcome corresponds to the comparison of the percentages of vascular density as a function of the severity of glaucoma.
Day 1
Difference of papilla vascularization depending on the regions of the papilla
Time Frame: Day 1

This outcome corresponds to the comparison of the percentages of vascular density as a function of the regions of the papilla (intra-papillary, peripapillary, superior, inferior, nasal, temporal).

184/5000 corresponds to the comparison of the percentages of vascular density as a function of the regions of the papilla (intra-papillary, peripapillary, superior, inferior, nasal, temporal).

Day 1
Vascularization of different regions of the papilla between case patients and control patients
Time Frame: Day 1
This outcome corresponds to the comparison of the percentages of vascular density of the regions of the papilla between the case patients and the control patients.
Day 1
Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of OCTA
Time Frame: Day 1
This outcome corresponds to the comparison of the sensitivity and the specificity of OCTA compared to the additional examinations conventionally carried out within the framework of the diagnosis of glaucoma (OCT and visual fields) within the various regions of the vascular papilla between the case patients and the control patients.
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 21, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 21, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 16, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OCTA

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glaucoma

Clinical Trials on Case Group

Subscribe