Low-dose Dasiglucagon for Prevention of Insulin-Induced Hypoglycemia in People With Type 1 Diabetes

February 8, 2021 updated by: Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen
The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of low-dose dasiglucagon (Zealand Pharma, Denmark) to oral carbohydrate consumption for prevention of s.c. insulin-induced hypoglycemia in CSII- and MDI-treated people with type 1 diabetes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Near-normalization of blood glucose levels through intensive insulin therapy has shown to reduce the risk of diabetes late complications, but the approach is associated with two major side effects: hypoglycemia and weight gain. Although management of hypoglycemia through oral carbohydrate consumption is generally effective, the approach can lead to excessive carbohydrate intake and cause rebound hyperglycemia. It has previously been demonstrated that subcutaneous (s.c.) low-dose glucagon can be utilized to effectively treat mild hypoglycemia in people with type 1 diabetes. However, the instability in aqueous solution of currently available glucagon and the need for reconstitution with sterile water immediately prior to administration has limited its clinical role outside emergency settings. Due to the stability and ready-to-use formulation, dasiglucagon does not hold the limitations known for the currently available glucagon preparations.

The aim of this randomized, partially single-blinded, three-arm cross-over study is to compare the efficacy of low-dose dasiglucagon (80 and 120 μg) to oral carbohydrate (15 g) consumption for prevention of s.c. insulin-induced hypoglycemia in CSII- and MDI-treated people with type 1 diabetes. On each study visit (separated by ≥ 3 days), an initial insulin bolus will be administered (at t = 0) aiming for a plasma glucose (PG) level of 3.0 mmol/l. When reaching 4.5 mmol/l, the intervention (s.c. dasiglucagon or oral carbohydrates) will be administered (t-intervention = 0), whereafter PG will me monitored for an additional 180 min.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Gentofte, Denmark, 2820
        • Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 64 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-64 years
  • Duration of T1D ≥ 3 years
  • Use of CSII or MDI therapy for ≥ 6 months
  • Current use of Novorapid (change from another fast-acting insulin to Novorapid prior to study initiation is allowed)
  • HbA1c ≤ 8.0%
  • Regular use of carbohydrate counting in the judgement of the investigator

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of anti-diabetic medicine (other than insulin), corticosteroids or other drugs affecting glucose metabolism during the study period or within 30 days prior to study start
  • History of allergy or intolerance to glucagon or glucagon-like products
  • Patients with pheochromocytoma
  • Clinically significant ECG abnormalities
  • Females who are pregnant, breast-feeding or intend to become pregnant or are not using adequate contraceptive methods (sterilization, intrauterine device, contraceptive pill, patch or injection)
  • Inability to understand the individual information and to give informed consent
  • Current participation in another clinical trial that, in the judgment of the principle investigator, will compromise the results of the study or the safety of the subject
  • Other concomitant medical or psychological condition that, according to the investigator's assessment, makes the individual unsuitable for study participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 80 µg s.c. dasiglucagon
80 µg of dasiglucagon will be administered subcutaneously when plasma glucose levels reach 4.5 mmol/l
Abdominal s.c. administration
Experimental: 120 µg s.c. dasiglucagon
120 µg of dasiglucagon will be administered subcutaneously when plasma glucose levels reach 4.5 mmol/l
Abdominal s.c. administration
Active Comparator: 15 g oral carbohydrate (dextrose tablets)
15 g of oral carbohydrate (dextrose tablets) will be administered when plasma glucose levels reach 4.5 mmol/l
Oral administration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Difference between study visits in time (min) in hypoglycemia (plasma glucose < 3.9 mmol/l) from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time Frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Difference between study visits in incidence rate of hypoglycemia (plasma glucose < 3.9 mmol/l) from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time Frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in incidence rate of level 2 hypoglycemia (plasma glucose < 3.0 mmol/l) from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time Frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in incidence rate of rebound hyperglycemia (plasma glucose > 10 mmol/l) from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time Frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in nadir plasma glucose concentration from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time Frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in peak plasma glucose concentration from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time Frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in incremental peak in plasma glucose concentration from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time Frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in mean plasma glucose concentration from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time Frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in time (min) from intervention to first increase in plasma glucose concentration of 1.1 mmol/l
Time Frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in plasma glucose Area Under the Curve (AUC) from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time Frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in time (min) to peak plasma glucose concentration from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time Frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in time (min) in range (plasma glucose ≥ 3.9 mmol/l and 10.0 mmol/l) from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time Frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in time (min) in hyperglycemia (plasma glucose > 10 mmol/l) from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time Frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in time (%) in hypoglycemia (plasma glucose < 3.9 mmol/l) (per protocol) from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time Frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in incidence rate of rescue carbohydrate administration from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time Frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in time (min) to rescue carbohydrate administration from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time Frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in plasma dasiglucagon Area Under the Curve (AUC) from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time Frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in peak plasma dasiglucagon concentration from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time Frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in time to peak plasma dasiglucagon concentration from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time Frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in serum insulin concentration at visit start (t = 0) and immediately before administration of the intervention (t-intervention = 0)
Time Frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in serum insulin AUC from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time Frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in dose (units) of insulin bolus at study start (t = 0)
Time Frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in change in Edinburgh Hypoglycemia Symptoms Scale (EHSS) from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time Frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in change in visual analogue scale (VAS) for nausea, headache, stomach ache, injection site pain, palpitations and hunger from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time Frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Difference between study visits in incidence rate of vomiting from 0-180 minutes post-intervention
Time Frame: Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)
Study visit 1 (day 1), study visit 2 (estimated day 4) and study visit 3 (estimated day 7)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christian Laugesen, MD, MD, PhD Candidate

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 2, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 4, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 4, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • H-20013256 (Registry Identifier: Regional Scientific Ethics Committee)
  • 2020-000551-12 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypoglycemia

Clinical Trials on Dasiglucagon

3
Subscribe