Expert Behaviors USGRA

July 29, 2020 updated by: University Health Network, Toronto

Expert Behaviors in Ultrasound Guided Regional Anesthesia A Mixed-Methods Study

Expert-performance begins by focusing specifically on the end-product of training and experience in the hands of the expert. By defining expert behaviors and techniques, investigators can guide learners and non-expert practitioners by offering them models to emulate. At Toronto Western Hospital (TWH), there are more than ten expert attending regional anesthesiologists who routinely provide clinical patient care in the block room. The primary objective of this study is to qualitatively and quantitatively examine behavior of experts performing ultrasound guided regional anesthesia techniques to identify those which are consistent and unique, and which may underpin expert performance.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

190

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

This is a mixed methods assessment study to be completed at TWH. We will recruit 10 fellowship-trained regional anesthesiology and pain medicine staff anesthesiologists to perform USGRA blocks while being video-recorded. Here, we specifically define expert as a staff anesthesiologist who has completed a fellowship in regional anesthesia and/or chronic pain and has at least 6-years of post-fellowship clinical experience with USGRA.

Consent will also be sought from 180 patients undergoing USGRA for surgical procedures at TWH to have the block completed by an expert, as previously defined, and to have the procedure recorded.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All elective patients coming to the regional BR at TWH aged 18-80

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any contraindication to USGRA (LA allergy, patient refusal, infection at injection site, etc.)
  • Inability to read or speak or comprehend English fluently

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Qualitative behaviors of experts performing UGRA techniques during pre-procedural discussion
Time Frame: 1 hour before procedure
Reviewers will identify behaviors exhibited by the expert operators during pre-procedural discussion
1 hour before procedure
Qualitative behaviors of experts performing UGRA techniques during patient and equipment preparation
Time Frame: 0.5 hour before procedure
Reviewers will identify behaviors exhibited by the expert operators during patient and equipment preparation
0.5 hour before procedure
Qualitative behaviours of experts performing UGRA techniques during ultrasound scanning of the target area;
Time Frame: 10 minutes before procedure
Reviewers will identify behaviors exhibited by the expert operators during ultrasound scanning of the target area;
10 minutes before procedure
Qualitative behaviours of experts performing UGRA techniques during needle advancement and local anesthetic deposition around the target nerve(s)
Time Frame: during procedure
Reviewers will identify behaviors exhibited by the expert operators during needle advancement and local anesthetic deposition around the target nerve(s).
during procedure
Quantitative data on block effectiveness defined by blocks requiring top-up
Time Frame: 0-1 hour after procedure
number of top-up will be collected
0-1 hour after procedure
Quantitative data on block effectiveness defined by blocks requiring conversion to GA
Time Frame: 0-1 hour after procedure
Incidence will be documented in case conversion to GA is needed
0-1 hour after procedure
Quantitative data on time to surgical anesthesia
Time Frame: 0-1 hour after procedure
defined by final needle removal to surgical anesthesia
0-1 hour after procedure
Quantitative data on time to block completion
Time Frame: 0-1 hour after procedure
defined by needle insertion to final needle removal
0-1 hour after procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ki Jinn Chin, MD, University Health Network, Toronto

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

August 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 15, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 30, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 19-6238

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia Education

3
Subscribe