Nurse-led COPD Self-management Intervention

January 30, 2022 updated by: Şenay Takmak, Pamukkale University

The Effect of Rational Drug Use and Symptom Control Training on Self-efficacy, Emotional Status and Clinical Parameters in COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)

Introduction: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) disease highest mortality and morbidity of respiratory diseases that third cause of death in the world and Turkey.

Purpose: Purpose of study improve self-efficacy, anxiety/depression, symptom control and exercise capacity, reduce use of health care of COPD patients.

Method: The study was conducted with a randomized controlled design. This study were included 41 COPD patients (İntervention=20, Control=21). Data collection tools were patient description form, COPD Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES), COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HAD), 6-Minute Walk Test (MWT) and tele-health form. Intervention consists patient education, training booklet and 3 month follow-up. Control group patients received only general care. The final test was performed three months later.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The skills and the knowledge necessary in COPD management and interventions required to develop this skill have conceptualized as self-management. The complex structure of COPD self-management includes medication compliance, smoking cessation, maintaining and increasing exercise capacity, regulating nutrition, healthy lifestyle changes, vaccination and symptom management.

According to the GOLD (2017) report, copd self-management cannot be achieved only with didactic teaching. Skill acquisition, behavior change and motivational interventions should be applied with education. Among these interventions, action plans are among the tools frequently used in preventing tele-health COPD attacks. Action plans can be used effectively in COPD to prevent attacks, symptom management and reduce the risk of anxiety / depression. One objectives of self-management is to reduce use of health care. Symptom management; It has been stated that it is effective in reducing hospitalization and days of hospitalization especially in patients with COPD diseases.

In studies involving self-management in COPD, self-management interventions increase health-related quality of life, control symptom, reduce the risk of anxiety / depression, increase self-efficacy, reduce respiratory hospital stays, reduce severity and duration of attacks, and reduce mortality at low impact. It is stated that the interventions made in the GOLD (2017) report provide improvements for health-related quality of life and patient outcomes. Because of self-management is a multi-component concept, variety in type of intervention and follow-up make it difficult to reach generalizable evidence.

Although many health professionals work with patients with COPD, self-management interventions are known to be carried out mostly by nurses or by multidisciplinary groups involving nurses.

This study is an example of applicable self-management intervention in terms of disease information and general management, rational drug use, symptom control training and evaluation with medium-term monitoring. It can contribute to literature in terms of determining the effect of nurse-managed self-management intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

41

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Denizli, Turkey, 20000
        • Denizli Public Hospitals Association, Buldan Chest Diseases Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Having a diagnosis of COPD
  • Being inpatient at chest diseases clinic
  • Being literate
  • Able to use a telephone
  • No communication disabilities
  • Being volunteers

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having mental illness
  • Respiratory comorbidity (lung cancer, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary tuberculosis),
  • Unable to attend the post-tests
  • Not reachable by phone

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Study group
Study group intervention consists patient education, training booklet and 3 month follow-up.
Patient education includes general disease information, COPD self-management and symptom control. The education face-to-face and practical training was provided by the researcher. The training booklet was prepared by the researcher. The readability of the booklet was very easy and its comprehensibility was tested by pre-application. Tele monitoring was done by the researcher for support and motivation. The participants were called 4 times by phone.
NO_INTERVENTION: Control group
Control group received only general care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
COPD Self-Efficacy Score
Time Frame: Change from baseline COPD self-efficacy score at 3 months
Scales were filled in by interviewing each participant.Scoring is done between 1-5 points. Increased score indicates an increase in self-efficacy in coping with respiratory distress.
Change from baseline COPD self-efficacy score at 3 months
COPD Assessment Test Score
Time Frame: Change from baseline COPD assessment test score at 3 months
Scales were filled in by interviewing each participant.Scoring is done between 0-40 points. Increased points indicate that the severity of the disease decreases.
Change from baseline COPD assessment test score at 3 months
Anxiety Depression Score
Time Frame: Change from baseline anxiety depression test score at 3 months
Scales were filled in by interviewing each participant. Turkey cut-off score of the scale used for anxiety, 10, were found to be 7 for depression. Participants who scored above these points were evaluated as risky.
Change from baseline anxiety depression test score at 3 months
6-Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: Change from baseline 6-minute walk distance at 3 months
Each participant received a 6-minute walk test as recommended by the AmericanThoracic Society.
Change from baseline 6-minute walk distance at 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of health care uses
Time Frame: Change in the number of initial health care use in the 3rd month
According to the patient's declaration, emergency room visit, chest diseases outpatient clinic and hospitalizations associated with respiration
Change in the number of initial health care use in the 3rd month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Nevin K Kurban, Prof. Dr., Consultant, Responsible researcher
  • Principal Investigator: Şenay Takmak, pHd, pHd student, Assistant researcher

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 28, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 17, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Study results will be announced in a publication.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Findings can be shared after the study has been published.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The sociodemographic and disease-related characteristics of the participants, the pre-post-test findings including the answers to the research questions and statistical analyzes will be shared.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COPD

Clinical Trials on patient education, training booklet, 3 months tele health

3
Subscribe