Pancreatic Anastomosis After Duodenopancreatectomy (PANGASBLUM)

Pancreatic Anastomosis After Duodenopancreatectomy: Pancreatogastrostomy Versus Blumgart Anastomosis: Prospective, Randomized and Multicentric Study

A national, multicenter, randomized, prospective, parallel group clinical study to evaluate two therapeutic strategies (invaginating pancreatogastric anastomosis versus Blumgart anastomosis).

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatic Anastomotic Leak
• Intervention / Treatment: Procedure: Pancreatogastric anastomosis.; Procedure: Blumgart Anastomosis

Detailed Description

Background: Postoperative pancreatic fistula is currently the most frequent complications after duodenopancreatectomy. There are currently no RCT comparing two of the most frequently used method of pancreato-enteric anastomosis (invaginating pancreatogastric anastomosis versus Blumgart anastomosis)

Hypothesis: in patients with resectable pancreatic and periampullary tumors, performing a Blumgart (AB) anastomosis for pancreatoenteric reconstruction after duodenopancreatectomy decreases the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (PPF) compared to to pancreatogastric anastomosis.

Main goal: To comparatively evaluate the rate of PPF in patients with pancreatic and periampullary tumors undergoing cephalic duodenopancreatectomy after reconstruction with Blumgart anastomosis or pancreatogastric anastomosis.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 216
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Spain
  • Valencia, Spain, 46010
    • Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients over 18 years old.
• Diagnosis of pancreatic and periampullary tumor pathology that requires pancreatoduodenectomy
• Signature of informed consent by the patient or his legal representative

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients in whom liver metastases or peritoneal carcinomatosis are detected during surgery.
• Patients in whom tumor resection is ultimately not achieved due to intraoperative evidence that the tumor is locally advanced, unresectable.
• Patients with macroscopic residual tumor (R2).
• High risk patients with severe pathology (ASA IV) according to the American Association of Anesthetists.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Pancreatogastric anastomosis.	Procedure: Pancreatogastric anastomosis.; Patients undergoing cephalic duodenopancreatectomy, reconstructing pancreatic-enteric communication by Pancreatogastric anastomosis.
Experimental: Blumgart Anastomosis	Procedure: Blumgart Anastomosis; Patients undergoing cephalic duodenopancreatectomy, reconstructing pancreatic-enteric communication by Blumgart anastomosis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Postoperative pancreatic fistula rate (PPF)	The post-operative pancreatic fistula (PPF) rate will be measured using the definition of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) : any measurable amount of fluid from a drain placed during the operation or percutaneously, with an amylase concentration greater than three times the plasma value.	3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Bleeding	According to the definition of the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery. which grades the severity of bleeding according to the clinical situation, diagnosis and need for treatment.	3 months
Gastric Emptying Delay (GED)	According to the definition of the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery, which establishes the existence of GED when a nasogastric tube is needed for more than 3 days or is placed from the third day of the postoperative period, as well as intolerance to an oral diet at the end of the first postoperative week.	3 months
Biliary Fistula	According to the definition of the International Study Group of Liver Surgery, which defines it as any measurable amount of fluid from a drain placed during the operation or percutaneously, with a concentration of bilirubin greater than three times the plasma value as of the third post-operative day.	3 months
Other complications.	All complications that may occur during the first 90 days of the postoperative period (including the mortality rate) should be collected and classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI)	3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Fundación para la Investigación del Hospital Clínico de Valencia
• Collaborators: Instituto de Salud Carlos III

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): June 4, 2020
• Primary Completion (Actual): September 11, 2024
• Study Completion (Actual): September 11, 2024

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: July 3, 2020
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 3, 2020
• First Posted (Actual): July 8, 2020

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): October 21, 2024
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 18, 2024
• Last Verified: October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Digestive System Diseases; Pathologic Processes; Neoplasms; Neoplasms by Site; Postoperative Complications; Endocrine System Diseases; Digestive System Neoplasms; Endocrine Gland Neoplasms; Pancreatic Diseases; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Anastomotic Leak
• Other Study ID Numbers: PANGASBLUM

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No