Double Tract Anastomosis and Gastric Tube Anastomosis to Proximal Gastrectomy (DTA&GTA)

December 7, 2017 updated by: Jian-Kun Hu

Remnant Stomach-jejunum Double Tract Anastomosis vs. Gastric Tube Anastomosis to Proximal Gastrectomy of Early Gastric Cancer- a Randomized Controlled Trial

Gastric cancer as one of the most common gastrointestinal cancers, radical resection of primary lesions combined with dissection of regional lymph-nodes is acknowledged by surgeons all over the world. When compared with the advanced upper third gastric cancer, proximal gastrectomy has been acknowledged as the standard therapeutic strategy for the early gastric cancer located in the upper third of the stomach. However, due to abandon the anti-reflux barrier of the digestive system caused by the dissection of the cardia and the lower esophageal sphincter, the belching、hiccup、Acid reflux、heartburn、chest pain symptoms and as well as the reflux esophagitis caused by the traditional esophagostomy permanently influence the postoperative quality of life for those patients. Nowadays, relationship between the digestive track reconstruction for proximal gastrectomy and the postoperative quality of life is still with controversies. Previous study reported the gastric tube anastomosis can minimize the reflux related symptoms when compared with traditional esophagogastrostomy. There still exited some patients need long-term anti-acid drug to control the reflux symptoms although underwent the gastric tube anastomosis. The double-track anastomosis for proximal gastrectomy may successfully control the reflux symptoms and there existed study found it is as safe as the esophagostomy. But there has no randomized control study to compare the postoperative quality of life between the gastric tube anastomosis and double-track anastomosis for proximal gastrectomy.

By the reasons above, a randomized controlled trial is conducted with the intention to compare the intraoperative and postoperative mortality and morbidity and the postoperative quality of life between the esophagogastrostomy and the double-track anastomosis in the proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

  1. Preoperative evaluation Patients satisfied with inclusion/exclusion criteria will be informed to join in the clinical study and signature the inform consent.
  2. Randomization: Intraoperative evaluation found that R0, proximal gastrectomy can be performed, the case will entrance into the Randomization period. Random numbers are computer-generated, with the third party applications.
  3. Surgical procedures: The surgical treatments is adopted the proximal gastrectomy according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer treatments guidelines, 2010, Version 3. Group A take the gastric tube anastomosis and Group B take the double-track anastomosis (the reconstruction method is described in the intervention section of study groups). The two study will take the similar surgical procedures except for the digestive track reconstruction.
  4. Postoperative recovery: Postoperative recovery period need to collect those relevant parameters of all the patients. All the relevant parameters had definitely definition in the Case Report Form of this study which included the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative clinicopathologic characteristics.
  5. Follow-up: The follow-up of this study divide into two parts, the postoperative quality of life and tumor characteristics outcomes. The information of the postoperative quality of life is collected by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORCT) QLQ-C30 and STO-22 questionnaires. At the postoperative 12 moths, the upper gastrointestinal scope is needed to examine the reflux esophagitis and the remnant gastritis according to Los Angeles Classification of esophagitis. The tumor related outcomes included long-term postoperative complications, recurrence type, relapse free survival (months) and the overall survival (months).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

4

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
        • West China Hospital, Sichuan University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Preoperative endoscopy and biopsy confirmed upper third gastric adenocarcinoma, and predictively feasible of proximal gastrectomy ;
  2. Predictively resectable diseases, early gastric cancer, of preoperative staging JGCA 14th Edition cT1N0M0-T2N0M0;
  3. Age:≤75 years, or ≥18 years;
  4. Without serious disease and malignance disease;
  5. Patients without previous history of upper abdominal surgery;
  6. WHO performance score ≤2, ASA score ≤3;
  7. No limit to sexual and race;
  8. informed consent required.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. With the history of the malignance disease;
  2. Patients with other severe complications cannot tolerate surgery: such as severe heart and lung diseases, heart function below clinical stage 2, uncontrollable hypertension, pulmonary infection, moderate to severe COPD, chronic bronchitis, severe diabetes and / or renal insufficiency, severe hepatitis and / or function below the rank of CHILD B grade, and severe malnutrition, etc.
  3. Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy which might affect the efficacy observation;
  4. Severity mental diseases;
  5. After signature the Clinical trial agreement, patients and their agent will quit the trial;
  6. primary lesion cannot be resected in the pattern of transabdominal proximal gastrectomy, but for total gastrectomy, Whipple's procedure, or combined organ resection or with a transthoracic approach surgery
  7. After signature the Clinical trial agreement, patients and their agent will quit the trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group B (double-track anastomosis)
Patients in the Group B will received the double-track anastomosis with proximal gastrectomy.

Double-track anastomosis group: First, cut off the jejunum about 15-20 cm away from the Treitz ligament; Second, Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy (E-J stomy, first anastomosis) was perform by 25mm circular stapler device; Third, from 30-40cm to the E-J stomy, perform the side-to-side gastrojejunostomy (G-J stomy, second anastomosis). Forth, from 25-30cm to the G-J stomy, perform the jejunojejunostomy (J-J stomy, third anastomosis).

(Reference: Ahn SH, Jung do H, Son SY, Lee CM, Park do J, Kim HH. Laparoscopic double-tract proximal gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2014;17(3):562-70.)

Other: Group A (Gastric tube anastomosis)
Patients in the Group A (Gastric tube anastomosis) will take the gastric tube anastomosis with proximal gastrectomy.

In the gastric tube group, the lesser curvature of the gastric remnant approximately 3 cm proximal to the pylorus was removed first by a linear stapling device. An approximately 5-cm-wide tubular stomach was then constructed with preserved right gastric vessels. The length of the tube was consistent with the greater curvature of the residual stomach. The reconstructed gastric tube was lastly anastomosed with the proximal esophageal end.

(Reference: Chen XF, Zhang B, Chen ZX, Hu JK, Dai B, Wang F, Yang HX, Chen JP. Gastric tube reconstruction reduces postoperative gastroesophageal reflux in adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57(3):738-745.)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
postoperative mortality and morbidity
Time Frame: postoperative period (30 days)
postoperative period (30 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intraoperative mortality and morbidity
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Intraoperative
postoperative quality of life
Time Frame: Postoperative period (at least one year)
Postoperative period (at least one year)
remnant gastritis
Time Frame: postoperative period (one year)
Evaluated by Los Angeles classification. Reference: Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, et al. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut 1999; 45: 172-80.
postoperative period (one year)
reflux esophagitis
Time Frame: Postoperative period (one year)
Evaluated by Los Angeles classification. Reference: Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, et al. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut 1999; 45: 172-80.
Postoperative period (one year)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 11, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2017

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Double-track anastomosis

3
Subscribe