Long-term Results of Pediatric Flexor Tendon Injuries

March 15, 2021 updated by: Marmara University

Effect of Hand Dominance on Functional Outcomes in Pediatric Patients With Flexor Tendon Injuries

Hand and upper extremity injuries are among the most common causes of admission of children to the emergency department since they are the most frequently injured part of body following head in pediatric and adolescent population. Although upper extremity fractures and contusions are the main reasons of pediatric hand injuries, tendon injuries are not also uncommon. There are limited data in the literature about the long-term results of children with flexor tendon injury. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term functional outcomes of children with flexor tendon injury.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Hand and upper extremity injuries are among the most common causes of admission of children to the emergency department since they are the most frequently injured part of body following head in pediatric and adolescent population. Although upper extremity fractures and contusions are the main reasons of pediatric hand injuries, tendon injuries are not also uncommon. While extensor tendon injuries have been reported to be most frequent than flexor tendon injuries for all age groups, the ratio of flexor to extensor tendon injuries is higher in pediatric population than adults and in children younger than 10 years old flexor tendon injuries are more common than extensor tendon injuries.Despite some challenges in the treatment of flexor tendon injuries of children, the outcomes have been reported to be better in children than adults since they have better blood supply, more rapid tendon healing and better remodeling ability of scars and adhesions. However, there is still a risk of permanent morbidities such as significant scarring and stiffness which can cause worse functional outcomes.There are limited data in the literature about the long-term results of children with flexor tendon injury. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term functional outcomes of children with flexor tendon injury.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
    • In The USA Or Canada, Please Select...
      • İstanbul, In The USA Or Canada, Please Select..., Turkey, 34899
        • Marmara University School of Medicine Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 18 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with flexor tendon injury

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • . Patients between the ages of 6-18 who have applied to orthopedics emergency department due to hand injury and have been operated with flexor tendon injury, for the last 3 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patients who had history of bilateral hand injury, delayed surgery, accompanying extensor tendon injury and a follow-up less than six months after injury were excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients with flexor tendon injury
Patients between the ages of 6-18 who have applied to orthopedics emergency department due to hand injury and have been operated with flexor tendon injury, for the last 3 years, were retrospectively scanned from hospital record. Eligible patients for the study were informed about the study by telephone and requested to come hospital for further evaluations including sensory, motor and functional assessments.
Other: Screening
The patients who agreed to participate to the study were assessed with a survey which included age, gender, height, weight and hand dominancy questions. Sensory, motor and functional assessments of the bilateral hand were performed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Jebson Taylor Hand Function test
Time Frame: Day 0
Jebsen - Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT) was performed on both hands for evaluation of the fine and gross motor functions. It is a standard and objective assessment method of hand functions with activities similar to those performed in daily life. The test consists of 7 subtests. During the test, a separate period is kept for each step. The functions of both hands are evaluated by the following operations; writing, card turning, picking up small common objects, simulated feeding, stacking backgammon-checkers, moving large light objects and moving large heavy objects. Score of each subset is time (seconds) to complete the task and total score is calculated by summing of times for each sub-tests
Day 0
Grip strength
Time Frame: Day 0
The grip strength measured using a Baseline Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer according to the recommendations of the American Hand Therapists Association.. It was measured with the shoulder in the adduction, elbow 90 * flexion, forearm neutral and wrist 0-30 * dorsiflexion and 0-15 * ulnar deviation while the person was sitting position. The patient was asked to grasp the dynamometer as tightly as he could. For each side, 3 applications were made with an interval of 20 seconds and the average of these measurements was taken
Day 0
Pinch Strength
Time Frame: Day 0
Baseline Hydraulic Pinch Gauge was used to measure pinch strength. The measurement was made in the same position as the grip strength measurement. The pinch gauge was placed between the tip of thumb and the tip of the index finger and the patient was asked to squeeze as strongly as he could. For each side, 3 applications were made with an interval of 20 seconds and the average of these measurements was taken
Day 0
Semmes -Weinstein Monofilament test
Time Frame: Day 0
Sensory examination was done with Semmes -Weinstein Monofilament test. This evaluation was started with the smallest monofilament and larger filaments were applied respectively, the test was stopped in the smallest monofilament the patient felt, and this value was recorded. Evaluations were made from the distal tips of the 1st and 2nd finger and the palmar surface of the 2nd metacarpophalangeal joint for the median nerve evaluation (monofilament test 1,2,3, respectively), distal tip of the 5th finger, the palmar surface of the 5th metacarpophalangeal joint and hypothenar area (monofilament test 4, 5, 6, respectively) for ulnar nerve evaluation.
Day 0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Marmara University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Canan Sanal-Toprak, Asst. Prof, Marmara University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 15, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 15, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 15, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 22, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 24, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 17, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 09.2020.443

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hand Injuries

Clinical Trials on Screening

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Slovenia

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe