Ultrasound and Phonophoresis in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

July 30, 2020 updated by: Fulya Bakılan, Eskisehir City Hospital

Evaluation of the Effects of Steroid Phonophoresis and Therapeutic Ultrasound in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Placebo - Controlled Trial

In this placebo-controlled, randomized, prospective study, the efficacy of ultrasonography (US) and steroid phonophoresis (PH) treatments was evaluated in patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Twenty-seven patients (46 hands) were admitted in this study. Patients were randomly divided three groups. The first group was ultrasound group, the second group was PH group and the third group was placebo US group. Continuous ultrasound with a frequency of 1 MHz, an intensity of 1.0 W/cm2 was used in the US and the PH groups. PH group received 0,1% dexamethasone. Placebo group received a frequency of 0 MHz, an intensity of 0 W/cm² ultrasound. Treatments were administered for 5 days a week, a total of 10 sessions. All patients also wore night splints during treatment. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Boston Symptom Severity Scale, Functional Capacity Scale, grip strength and electroneurophysiological evaluations were compared before the treatment, after the treatment and three months later.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

27

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Mild or moderate idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome (without thenar atrophy or spontaneous activity on electrophysiological examination of the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patients with medical problems (diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, rheumatic diseases, acute trauma, pregnancy etc.)
  • cervical radiculopathy
  • etiologic factors which predispose to or polyneuropathy
  • reinnervation or fibrillation potentials in their abductor pollicis brevis muscles
  • physical or medical therapy within 3 months for CTS and steroid injection applied
  • experience CTS median nerve trauma and CTS surgery
  • serious thenar atrophy and anesthesia
  • contraindication in steroid treatment (steroid allergies, hypertension etc.)
  • contraindication in ultrasonic therapy (bleeding disorders, acute inflammation of the joints, acute infections, cancer and precancerous lesions, arteriovenous circulatory disorders etc.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ultrasound
ultrasound : a frequency of 1 MHz and an intensity of 1 W/cm2, 5 days a week, a total of 10 sessions
5 days a week, a total of 10 sessions
Other Names:
  • phonophoresis
  • placebo ultrasound
Experimental: phonophoresis
an intensity of 1 W/cm2 and a frequency of 1 MHz and phonophoresis with 0.1% dexamethasone pomade,5 days a week, a total of 10 sessions
5 days a week, a total of 10 sessions
Other Names:
  • phonophoresis
  • placebo ultrasound
Placebo Comparator: placebo ultrasound
same ultrasound device as described above seemed to be working but without delivering any output, 5 days a week, a total of 10 sessions
5 days a week, a total of 10 sessions
Other Names:
  • phonophoresis
  • placebo ultrasound

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: three month
Change from baseline in pain with Visual Analogue Scale:Patients were asked to express the pain felt by them using 0-10 scales, 0 no pain and 10 the most severe pain faced throughout their life.
three month
Boston Symptom Severity Scale
Time Frame: three month
Change from baseline in symptom severity with Boston Symptom Severity Scale:Patients were asked to choose an answer among five answers taking 1- 5 points in the questionnaires with 11 statements. Total point was divided into the number of statements and the score was determined and high scores were interpreted as increased symptom severity
three month
Boston Functional Capacity Scale
Time Frame: three month
Change from baseline in functional status with Boston Functional Capacity Scale:Patients were asked to choose an answer among five answers taking 1- 5 points in the questionnaires with 11 statements. Total point was divided into the number of statements and average score was determined and high scores were interpreted as functionality deformation in the hands
three month
grip strength
Time Frame: three month
Change from baseline in strength with grip strength:To assess the grip strength, baseline hydraulic hand dynamometer was used. 3 measurements were made for each patient and the average of them was calculated
three month
electroneurophysiological evaluations
Time Frame: three month
Change from baseline electroneurophysiological measurement:The median nerve motor conduction velocity(m/s) , the median nerve motor distal latency(ms), 2nd finger - palm median nerve sensory distal latency(ms), 2nd finger - palm median nerve sensory conduction velocity(m/s), median sensory nerve conduction velocity(m/s) and median nerve sensory distal latency between the wrist and palm(ms)
three month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Burcu Ortanca, Eskişehir City Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 14, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

January 15, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Clinical Trials on ultrasound

Subscribe