Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy of an Intervention Aimed At Reducing the Length of Stay After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (FAST-TAVI II)

December 4, 2024 updated by: University Hospital, Rouen

Etude Multicentrique Évaluant L'efficacité D'une Intervention Visant À Réduire La Durée De Séjour Après L'implantation D'une Bioprothèse Aortique Par Voie Transfémorale

Since the first implantation of a percutaneous aortic bioprosthesis (TAVI) in 2002 (Cribier et al. Circulation 2002), TAVI occupies an increasing place in the management of aortic stenosis (AR) . Initially reserved for inoperable patients at high surgical risk, TAVI is also recommended in patients at intermediate risk, especially when a femoral approach (TF) is possible (Baumgartner et al. Eur Heart J. 2017).

Currently, there is no recommendation regarding length of stay after TAVI and practices are extremely heterogeneous. Despite the growing experience of centers, better patient selection and a reduction in complications, the length of stay after TAVI remains very high in France.

Faced with the great disparity observed between the centers, efforts are necessary to educate the centers in order to further reduce the length of stay after TF-TAVI. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention based on training teams to reduce the length of stay after TF-TAVI.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1842

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amiens, France
        • CHU d'Amiens
      • Angers, France
        • CHU d'Angers
      • Bordeaux, France
        • CHU de Bordeaux
      • Brest, France
        • CHU de Brest
      • Caen, France
        • CHU de Caen
      • Caen, France
        • Hôpital Prive Saint Martin
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France
        • CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
      • Créteil, France
        • Hôpital Henri Mondor (AP-HP)
      • Dijon, France
        • CHU de Dijon
      • Grenoble, France
        • CHU de Grenoble
      • Limoges, France
        • CHU de Limoges
      • Massy, France
        • Hopital Prive Jacques Cartier
      • Montpellier, France
        • Clinique du Millénaire
      • Paris, France
        • Hôpital Bichat, AP-HP
      • Paris, France
        • Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou (AP-HP)
      • Poitiers, France
        • CHU de Poitiers
      • Strasbourg, France
        • CHU de Strasbourg
      • Toulouse, France
        • CHU de Toulouse
      • Toulouse, France
        • Clinique Pasteur
      • Tours, France
        • Clinique Saint Gatien

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient over 18 years of age;
  2. Patient hospitalized for TF-TAVI
  3. Patient affiliated or benefiting from a health insurance scheme
  4. Patient having read and understood the information letter and having signed the consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Proven pregnant woman (positive urine pregnancy test) or breastfeeding or absence of effective contraception (as defined by the WHO) or postmenopausal woman without confirmation diagnosis obtained (amenorrhea not medically induced for at least 12 months before the initiation visit) ; 1
  2. Person deprived of their liberty by an administrative or judicial decision or person placed under the protection of justice / guardianship or curatorship
  3. History of illness or psychological or sensory abnormality likely to prevent the subject from fully understanding the conditions required for participating in the protocol or preventing him from giving his informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group
The randomized centres in this group will not change their practices.
Experimental: Intervention group
The randomized centres in this group will be follow a training dedicated on implementation of "organizational" and "therapeutic" measures (for prevention and management of complications) to reduce lenght-of-stay after TF TAVI.
Training dedicated on implementation of "organizational" and "therapeutic" measures (for prevention and management of complications) to reduce lenght-of-stay after TF TAVI.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate the effectiveness of a multi-component organizational intervention
Time Frame: Year 1
Proportion of patients benefiting from TF-TAVI with a length of stay less than or equal to 3 days.
Year 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate the safety of the intervention
Time Frame: Day 30

This outcome will be evaluated using :

  • the average length of stay,
  • the 30-day rehospitalization rate and
  • the 30-day death rate.
Day 30
To evaluate the budgetary impact of the intervention
Time Frame: Year 1

This outcome will be assessed using:

  • the hospital costs from the point of view of the hospital and
  • the financial gains for health insurance that would be associated with the generalization of the intervention in France.
Year 1
To evaluate the implementation of the intervention
Time Frame: Year 1
This outcome will be evaluated using the rate of adherence of the centers to the procedures aiming to reduce the length of stay (questionnaires)
Year 1
To identify the factors associated with the effectiveness and safety of the intervention
Time Frame: Year 1
This outcome will be assessed using factors associated with lengths of stay less than or equal to 3 days.
Year 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 16, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 9, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

February 9, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on Training

Subscribe