Influence of Fampridine on Working Memory in Healthy Subjects (Fampyr_2020)

October 13, 2020 updated by: Prof. Dominique de Quervain, MD

Randomized Placebo-controlled Phase II Cross-over Study on the Influence of Fampridine on Working Memory in Healthy Subjects

Proof-of-concept study on the effects of 10 mg fampridine (oral administration) on working memory in healthy participants.

The hypotheses is that fampridine improves working memory performance.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • BS
      • Basel, BS, Switzerland, 4055
        • University of Basel, Transfaculty Research Platform

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 30 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • male or female
  • generally healthy
  • normotensive (BP between 90/60 mmHg and 140/90 mmHg)
  • BMI between 19 and 29,9 kg/m2
  • aged between 18 and 30 years
  • fluent German-speaking
  • Informed consent as documented by signature

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contraindications to the class of drugs under study, e.g. known hypersensitivity or allergy to 4-aminopyridine
  • use of potassium channel blockers within the last 3 months
  • concomitant treatment with OCT 2 inhibitors (e.g. cimetidine, propranolol)
  • acute or chronic psychiatric disorder (e.g. major depression, psychoses, somatoform disorder, suicidal tendency)
  • acute cerebrovascular condition
  • history of seizures
  • risk of lowered seizure threshold (due to e.g. sleep deprivation, withdrawal of alcohol after alcohol abuse)
  • renal impairment
  • history of malignant cancers
  • walking problems (e.g. due to dizziness)
  • other clinically significant concomitant disease states (e.g. hepatic dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, asthma)
  • clinically significant laboratory or ECG abnormality that could be a safety issue in the study
  • known or suspected non-compliance
  • drug or alcohol abuse
  • inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language or psychological problems of the participant
  • participation in another study with an investigational drug within the 30 days preceding and during the present study
  • prior participation (less than two years ago) in a study investigating working memory (notably the n-back task)
  • enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons
  • smoking (>3 cigarettes per day)
  • intake of psychoactive drugs (e.g. benzodiazepines, antidepressants, neuroleptics)
  • pregnancy or breast feeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fampridine SR

Single oral administration of a tablet fampridine (10 mg) formulated for oral administration taken once in the morning without food. Tablets must be administered whole.

The single intake is followed by a washout period of at least 7 days equalling over 40 half-lives of the active substance fampridine (t½ = 3.61 h) between experimental and control intervention.

Fampridine is an inhibitor of voltage-gated potassium (Kv) channels and is approved in Switzerland for treatment of gait problems in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS).
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Identically looking placebo tablets consisting of the identical additives formulated for oral administration.
no active component

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Medium-load working memory performance
Time Frame: test day 1 and 2, each 4 hours after intake of study medication to assess differences between the Verum and Placebo condition

Accuracy as assessed by a letter n-back task (Papassotiropoulos, Henke et al. 2011) with the levels 0-back and 2-back.

This test includes a 2-back task assessing working memory and a 0-back task ('x-target' task) measuring concentration. The 2-back task requires participants to respond to a letter repeat with one intervening letter (for example, S-m-s-g…). The 'x-target' task requires participants to respond to the occurrence of the letter 'x' in a sequence of letters (for example, N-l-X-g…). Accuracy (i.e. correct 2-back responses minus correct 0-back responses) will be calculated.

test day 1 and 2, each 4 hours after intake of study medication to assess differences between the Verum and Placebo condition

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reaction time
Time Frame: test day 1 and 2 each 4 hours after intake of study medication to assess differences between the Verum and Placebo condition
Reaction time for correct 2-back responses minus correct 0-back responses.
test day 1 and 2 each 4 hours after intake of study medication to assess differences between the Verum and Placebo condition
N-back with a 3-back condition
Time Frame: test day 1 and 2 each 4 hours after intake of study medication to assess differences between the Verum and Placebo condition
N-back with a 3-back condition, which is more demanding than the 2-back condition. Accuracy (3-back minus 0-back) will be calculated.
test day 1 and 2 each 4 hours after intake of study medication to assess differences between the Verum and Placebo condition
Symbol Digit Modalities Test, SDMT
Time Frame: test day 1 and 2 each 4 hours after intake of study medication to assess differences between the Verum and Placebo condition
Symbol Digit Modalities Test, SDMT (Smith 2013, 13th edition), a processing speed test. The test consists of the presentation of a series of 9 symbols, each of them is paired with a single digit, labeled 1-9, in a key at the top of a sheet. The remainder of the page has a pseudorandomized sequence of the symbols and the participant must respond with the digit associated with each of these as quickly as possible. The score is the number of correct answers in 90 seconds. The administration of SDMT will be preceded by a learning sequence at both timepoints. A parallel version will be used for the second test day.
test day 1 and 2 each 4 hours after intake of study medication to assess differences between the Verum and Placebo condition
Bochumer Matrizentest (BOMAT - advanced -short)
Time Frame: test day 1 and 2 each 4 hours after intake of study medication to assess differences between the Verum and Placebo condition
Bochumer Matrizentest (BOMAT - advanced -short; Hossiep/Turck/Hasella, 2001, 1st edition), matrix reasoning. The BOMAT will be administered to measure fluid intelligence (Gf) consisting of 29 items. A time-limited version will be used according to Jaeggi (Jaeggi 2010). The total score is calculated by summing the correct solutions, ranging between 0 to 29. A parallel version will be used for the second test day.
test day 1 and 2 each 4 hours after intake of study medication to assess differences between the Verum and Placebo condition
Digit Span Task
Time Frame: test day 1 and 2 each 4 hours after intake of study medication to assess differences between the Verum and Placebo condition
Digit span task, a subtest of the "Wechsler Intelligenztest für Erwachsene" (WIE;von Aster 2006). Total scores for digit span forward and backward will be calculated as described in the manual of the WIE. A parallel version will be used for the second test day.
test day 1 and 2 each 4 hours after intake of study medication to assess differences between the Verum and Placebo condition

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Dominique de Quervain, Prof, University of Basel, Transfaculty Research Platform
  • Study Chair: Andreas Papassotiropoulos, Prof, University of Basel, Transfacutly Research Platform

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

October 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

All IPD (de-identified) that underlie results in a publication will be shared upon reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

IPD will be available after publication, study protocol (including statistical analysis plan) will be made available before start of the study.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

All IPD (de-identified) that underlie results in a publication will be shared upon reasonable request for scientific purposes. A reasonable request consists of a short description of the scientific purpose. Requests will be reviewed by the team of the principle investigator.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Working Memory

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe