- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04518371
Clinical Performance of Milled Resin Composite in Restoration of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth Over One Year
Clinical Performance and Wear Resistance of Milled Resin Composite Material Versus Direct Nanohybrid Bulk-Fill Resin Composite in Restoration of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth Over One Year: Randomized Clinical Trial
In patients with endodontically treated teeth, will the Indirect Milled composite Endo-crown restorations have a better clinical performance and more wear resistance than the Direct Bulk-Fill resin composite restorations over one year?
Primary Objective: To evaluate clinical performance of different Techniques of Composite Restorations (Indirect restorations using a CAD/CAM grinding process, BRILLIANT Crios, Coltène/Whaledent AG, Switzerland or Direct a light-cured, bulk-fill nanocomposite restorative material, Filtek™ One Bulk Fill Restorative, 3M ESPE Dental Products, USA) in Endodontically treated posterior teeth.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
The study will be conducted in Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University; The operator in charge will be Esraa Esmeail Hussien.
Null-hypothesis: There are no differences in the clinical performance of indirect CAD/CAM milled composite when compared to direct bulk-fil composite endocrowns when in the posterior area.
Aim: This clinical trial will be conducted to assess the clinical performance of using indirect Milled composite or direct bulk-fill resin composite Endo-crowns for restoring the endo-treated teeth, as well to measure the amount of wear on the occlusal tables of both restorations using Digital Scanner.
Patients will be selected from the outpatient clinic of the department Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
Clinical Steps:
- A tapered stone with rounded end in a high-speed handpiece with air /water coolant will be used to properly prepare the cavity walls to receive the indirect restoration and any remaining carious dentin will be excavated and removed.
- Cuspal tipping will be done by a wheel stone about 1.5-2mm.
- The entrance to the pulpal canal will be opened. Gutta percha will be removed to a depth not exceeding 2 mm to take advantage of the saddle-like anatomy of the cavity floor. This should be done with a nonabrasive instrument to maintain the integrity of the canal's entrance. No drilling into the dentin will be carried out.
- Any remaining undercuts will be blocked with conventional resin composite.
- The impression will be taken, and the final restoration will be fabricated either direct or indirect.
- The final restoration should be checked intraorally for proximal contacts, occlusion and marginal fit before cementation.
- Isolation of operatory field using rubber dam.
- Selective enamel etching technique will be applied for bonding of tooth structure, 35-40% phosphoric acid gel will be applied to the enamel margins only for 15 seconds, rinsed for 15 seconds and gently dried by cotton pellet.
- Adhesive will be used according to the manufacturers' instructions.
- Adhesive resin cement will be applied into the preparation. The restoration will be placed in the cavity and checked for complete seating. The cement will be light cured for only 2 seconds to facilitate removal of the excess. Then light curing will be done from all directions each for 40 seconds for achieving the final set.
- The proximal contacts will be checked with dental floss.
- The occlusion will be adjusted using articulating paper.
- Finishing and Polishing using finishing stones and polishing rubber points.
Primary Objective: To evaluate clinical performance of different Techniques of Composite Restorations (Indirect restorations using a CAD/CAM grinding process, BRILLIANT Crios, Coltène/Whaledent AG, Switzerland or Direct a light-cured, bulk-fill nanocomposite restorative material, Filtek™ One Bulk Fill Restorative, 3M ESPE Dental Products, USA) in Endodontically treated posterior teeth.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cairo, Egypt, 00202
- Cairo University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria of participants:
- Patients with asymptomatic endodontically treated molars.
- Males or Females.
- Good oral hygiene.
- Co-operative patients approving to participate in the study.
Inclusion Criteria of teeth:
- Asymptomatic endodontically treated upper or lower molars with
- Homogenous root canal filling ending 1-2mm from the radiographic apex.
- Proximal compound cavities.
- Favorable occlusion.
Exclusion criteria of participants:
- High caries index with poor oral hygiene.
- Severe medical complications.
- Pregnancy.
- Allergic history concerning methacrylates Disabilities.
- Heavy smoking.
- Xerostomia.
- Lack of compliance.
- Evidence of parafunctional habits.
- Temporomandibular joint disorders.
Exclusion criteria of the teeth:
- Teeth with remaining wall thickness less than 1mm.
- Teeth with improper or symptomatic endodontic treatment.
- Deep subgingival cavity margins.
- Possible future prosthodontic restoration of teeth.
- Severe periodontal problems.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Indirect Restoration
Milled Resin Composite Block, Shock-absorbing effect due to the dentine-like modulus of elasticity makes BRILLIANT Crios extremely well suited for implant restorations.it is composed of dental glass (barium glass ˂ 1.0 μm), amorphous silica (Sio2 ˂ 20 nm), resin matrix (cross-linked methacrylates) and pigments (inorganic pigments such as ferrous oxide or titanium dioxide).
|
Shock-absorbing effect due to the dentine-like modulus of elasticity makes BRILLIANT Crios extremely well suited for implant restorations.it is composed of dental glass (barium glass ˂ 1.0 μm), amorphous silica (Sio2 ˂ 20 nm), resin matrix (cross-linked methacrylates) and pigments
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Direct Restoration
3M™ Filtek™ One Bulk Fill Restorative is a visible light activated, restorative composite optimized to create fast and easy restorations. It is composed of fillers which are a combination of a non-agglomerated/non-aggregated 20 nm silica filler, 4 to 11 nm zirconia filler, zirconia/silica cluster filler and ytterbium trifluoride filler consisting of 100nm particles. The inorganic filler loading is about 76.5% by weight (58.5% by volume). |
Shock-absorbing effect due to the dentine-like modulus of elasticity makes BRILLIANT Crios extremely well suited for implant restorations.it is composed of dental glass (barium glass ˂ 1.0 μm), amorphous silica (Sio2 ˂ 20 nm), resin matrix (cross-linked methacrylates) and pigments
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Degree of Continuity between natural tooth structure and the restoration
Time Frame: Immediately after procedure
|
Tactile sensation checking the anatomic form to show if there is no discontinuity, Slight discontinuity, or discontinuity and failure
|
Immediately after procedure
|
|
Degree of Continuity between natural tooth structure and the restoration
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Tactile sensation checking the anatomic form to show if there is no discontinuity, Slight discontinuity, or discontinuity and failure
|
6 months
|
|
Degree of Continuity between natural tooth structure and the restoration
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Tactile sensation checking the anatomic form to show if there is no discontinuity, Slight discontinuity, or discontinuity and failure
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The degree of mismatch from the normal range of tooth shades and translucency
Time Frame: Immediately after procedure
|
Visual inspection to check the proximity of the shade from the natural tooth
|
Immediately after procedure
|
|
The degree of mismatch from the normal range of tooth shades and translucency
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Visual inspection to check the proximity of the shade from the natural tooth
|
6 months
|
|
The degree of mismatch from the normal range of tooth shades and translucency
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Visual inspection to check the proximity of the shade from the natural tooth
|
12 months
|
|
Distance penetrated due to secondary caries by visual evidence of dark keep discoloration adjacent to the restoration but not directly associated with cavosurface margins
Time Frame: Immediately after procedure
|
Visual inspection of discoloration that occurs on the tooth after the filling has been used for a period of time
|
Immediately after procedure
|
|
Distance penetrated due to secondary caries by visual evidence of dark keep discoloration adjacent to the restoration but not directly associated with cavosurface margins
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Visual inspection of discoloration that occurs on the tooth after the filling has been used for a period of time
|
6 months
|
|
Distance penetrated due to secondary caries by visual evidence of dark keep discoloration adjacent to the restoration but not directly associated with cavosurface margins
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Visual inspection of discoloration that occurs on the tooth after the filling has been used for a period of time
|
12 months
|
|
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (evaporative stimulus)
Time Frame: Immediately after procedure
|
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity around the restoration stimulated by air blast measured by YES or NO scale
|
Immediately after procedure
|
|
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (evaporative stimulus)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity around the restoration stimulated by air blast measured by YES or NO scale
|
6 months
|
|
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (evaporative stimulus)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity around the restoration stimulated by air blast measured by YES or NO scale
|
12 months
|
|
Area of continuous movement of an explorer across the surface of the restoration
Time Frame: Immediately after procedure
|
Surface texture is highly polished or gritty containing supramicron-sized particles or Surface pitting is coarse to inhibit the continuous movement of an explorer across the surface
|
Immediately after procedure
|
|
Area of continuous movement of an explorer across the surface of the restoration
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Surface texture is highly polished or gritty containing supramicron-sized particles or Surface pitting is coarse to inhibit the continuous movement of an explorer across the surface
|
6 months
|
|
Area of continuous movement of an explorer across the surface of the restoration
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Surface texture is highly polished or gritty containing supramicron-sized particles or Surface pitting is coarse to inhibit the continuous movement of an explorer across the surface
|
12 months
|
|
Distance penetrated by the Explorer at the tooth restoration interface
Time Frame: Immediately after procedure
|
The explorer will be drawn across the surface of the restoration toward the tooth
|
Immediately after procedure
|
|
Distance penetrated by the Explorer at the tooth restoration interface
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The explorer will be drawn across the surface of the restoration toward the tooth
|
6 months
|
|
Distance penetrated by the Explorer at the tooth restoration interface
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The explorer will be drawn across the surface of the restoration toward the tooth
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Esraa Es Hussien, Cairo University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CairoU-EEHussien
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Endodontically Treated Teeth
-
Mersin UniversityRecruitingEndodontically-Treated TeethTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Susana MorimotoCompletedCeramic Restorations in Endodontically Treated TeethBrazil
-
University Medical Center GroningenActive, not recruitingEndodontically-Treated Teeth | Composite Resins | Restoration of Posterior Teeth | Endocrown Restoration
-
Cukurova UniversityCompletedEndodontically-Treated Teeth
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownEndodontically-Treated Teeth | Spacing of Anterior Maxillary Teeth | Broken Teeth Injury With ComplicationEgypt
-
TC Erciyes UniversityCompletedClinical Performance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored With Endocrowns and OverlaysTurkey
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownBadly Decayed Teeth andTeeth Restored With Large Filling Restorations and Endodontically Treated Teeth and Malformed Teeth and Malposed Teeth
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingEndodontically Treated Teeth | Mutilated Teeth
-
Cairo UniversityUnknown
Clinical Trials on Reinforced composite for the fabrication of permanent, indirect restorations using a CAD/CAM grinding process.
-
Istanbul Medipol University HospitalCompletedDental Restoration FailuresTurkey