Clinical Performance of Milled Resin Composite in Restoration of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth Over One Year

August 19, 2023 updated by: Esraa Esmeail Hussien, Cairo University

Clinical Performance and Wear Resistance of Milled Resin Composite Material Versus Direct Nanohybrid Bulk-Fill Resin Composite in Restoration of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth Over One Year: Randomized Clinical Trial

In patients with endodontically treated teeth, will the Indirect Milled composite Endo-crown restorations have a better clinical performance and more wear resistance than the Direct Bulk-Fill resin composite restorations over one year?

Primary Objective: To evaluate clinical performance of different Techniques of Composite Restorations (Indirect restorations using a CAD/CAM grinding process, BRILLIANT Crios, Coltène/Whaledent AG, Switzerland or Direct a light-cured, bulk-fill nanocomposite restorative material, Filtek™ One Bulk Fill Restorative, 3M ESPE Dental Products, USA) in Endodontically treated posterior teeth.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study will be conducted in Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University; The operator in charge will be Esraa Esmeail Hussien.

Null-hypothesis: There are no differences in the clinical performance of indirect CAD/CAM milled composite when compared to direct bulk-fil composite endocrowns when in the posterior area.

Aim: This clinical trial will be conducted to assess the clinical performance of using indirect Milled composite or direct bulk-fill resin composite Endo-crowns for restoring the endo-treated teeth, as well to measure the amount of wear on the occlusal tables of both restorations using Digital Scanner.

Patients will be selected from the outpatient clinic of the department Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University

Clinical Steps:

  • A tapered stone with rounded end in a high-speed handpiece with air /water coolant will be used to properly prepare the cavity walls to receive the indirect restoration and any remaining carious dentin will be excavated and removed.
  • Cuspal tipping will be done by a wheel stone about 1.5-2mm.
  • The entrance to the pulpal canal will be opened. Gutta percha will be removed to a depth not exceeding 2 mm to take advantage of the saddle-like anatomy of the cavity floor. This should be done with a nonabrasive instrument to maintain the integrity of the canal's entrance. No drilling into the dentin will be carried out.
  • Any remaining undercuts will be blocked with conventional resin composite.
  • The impression will be taken, and the final restoration will be fabricated either direct or indirect.
  • The final restoration should be checked intraorally for proximal contacts, occlusion and marginal fit before cementation.
  • Isolation of operatory field using rubber dam.
  • Selective enamel etching technique will be applied for bonding of tooth structure, 35-40% phosphoric acid gel will be applied to the enamel margins only for 15 seconds, rinsed for 15 seconds and gently dried by cotton pellet.
  • Adhesive will be used according to the manufacturers' instructions.
  • Adhesive resin cement will be applied into the preparation. The restoration will be placed in the cavity and checked for complete seating. The cement will be light cured for only 2 seconds to facilitate removal of the excess. Then light curing will be done from all directions each for 40 seconds for achieving the final set.
  • The proximal contacts will be checked with dental floss.
  • The occlusion will be adjusted using articulating paper.
  • Finishing and Polishing using finishing stones and polishing rubber points.

Primary Objective: To evaluate clinical performance of different Techniques of Composite Restorations (Indirect restorations using a CAD/CAM grinding process, BRILLIANT Crios, Coltène/Whaledent AG, Switzerland or Direct a light-cured, bulk-fill nanocomposite restorative material, Filtek™ One Bulk Fill Restorative, 3M ESPE Dental Products, USA) in Endodontically treated posterior teeth.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 00202
        • Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 55 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria of participants:

  • Patients with asymptomatic endodontically treated molars.
  • Males or Females.
  • Good oral hygiene.
  • Co-operative patients approving to participate in the study.

Inclusion Criteria of teeth:

  • Asymptomatic endodontically treated upper or lower molars with
  • Homogenous root canal filling ending 1-2mm from the radiographic apex.
  • Proximal compound cavities.
  • Favorable occlusion.

Exclusion criteria of participants:

  • High caries index with poor oral hygiene.
  • Severe medical complications.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Allergic history concerning methacrylates Disabilities.
  • Heavy smoking.
  • Xerostomia.
  • Lack of compliance.
  • Evidence of parafunctional habits.
  • Temporomandibular joint disorders.

Exclusion criteria of the teeth:

  • Teeth with remaining wall thickness less than 1mm.
  • Teeth with improper or symptomatic endodontic treatment.
  • Deep subgingival cavity margins.
  • Possible future prosthodontic restoration of teeth.
  • Severe periodontal problems.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Indirect Restoration
Milled Resin Composite Block, Shock-absorbing effect due to the dentine-like modulus of elasticity makes BRILLIANT Crios extremely well suited for implant restorations.it is composed of dental glass (barium glass ˂ 1.0 μm), amorphous silica (Sio2 ˂ 20 nm), resin matrix (cross-linked methacrylates) and pigments (inorganic pigments such as ferrous oxide or titanium dioxide).
Shock-absorbing effect due to the dentine-like modulus of elasticity makes BRILLIANT Crios extremely well suited for implant restorations.it is composed of dental glass (barium glass ˂ 1.0 μm), amorphous silica (Sio2 ˂ 20 nm), resin matrix (cross-linked methacrylates) and pigments
Other Names:
  • CAD/CAM Composite endo-crown
Active Comparator: Direct Restoration

3M™ Filtek™ One Bulk Fill Restorative is a visible light activated, restorative composite optimized to create fast and easy restorations.

It is composed of fillers which are a combination of a non-agglomerated/non-aggregated 20 nm silica filler, 4 to 11 nm zirconia filler, zirconia/silica cluster filler and ytterbium trifluoride filler consisting of 100nm particles. The inorganic filler loading is about 76.5% by weight (58.5% by volume).

Shock-absorbing effect due to the dentine-like modulus of elasticity makes BRILLIANT Crios extremely well suited for implant restorations.it is composed of dental glass (barium glass ˂ 1.0 μm), amorphous silica (Sio2 ˂ 20 nm), resin matrix (cross-linked methacrylates) and pigments
Other Names:
  • CAD/CAM Composite endo-crown

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Degree of Continuity between natural tooth structure and the restoration
Time Frame: Immediately after procedure
Tactile sensation checking the anatomic form to show if there is no discontinuity, Slight discontinuity, or discontinuity and failure
Immediately after procedure
Degree of Continuity between natural tooth structure and the restoration
Time Frame: 6 months
Tactile sensation checking the anatomic form to show if there is no discontinuity, Slight discontinuity, or discontinuity and failure
6 months
Degree of Continuity between natural tooth structure and the restoration
Time Frame: 12 months
Tactile sensation checking the anatomic form to show if there is no discontinuity, Slight discontinuity, or discontinuity and failure
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The degree of mismatch from the normal range of tooth shades and translucency
Time Frame: Immediately after procedure
Visual inspection to check the proximity of the shade from the natural tooth
Immediately after procedure
The degree of mismatch from the normal range of tooth shades and translucency
Time Frame: 6 months
Visual inspection to check the proximity of the shade from the natural tooth
6 months
The degree of mismatch from the normal range of tooth shades and translucency
Time Frame: 12 months
Visual inspection to check the proximity of the shade from the natural tooth
12 months
Distance penetrated due to secondary caries by visual evidence of dark keep discoloration adjacent to the restoration but not directly associated with cavosurface margins
Time Frame: Immediately after procedure
Visual inspection of discoloration that occurs on the tooth after the filling has been used for a period of time
Immediately after procedure
Distance penetrated due to secondary caries by visual evidence of dark keep discoloration adjacent to the restoration but not directly associated with cavosurface margins
Time Frame: 6 months
Visual inspection of discoloration that occurs on the tooth after the filling has been used for a period of time
6 months
Distance penetrated due to secondary caries by visual evidence of dark keep discoloration adjacent to the restoration but not directly associated with cavosurface margins
Time Frame: 12 months
Visual inspection of discoloration that occurs on the tooth after the filling has been used for a period of time
12 months
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (evaporative stimulus)
Time Frame: Immediately after procedure
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity around the restoration stimulated by air blast measured by YES or NO scale
Immediately after procedure
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (evaporative stimulus)
Time Frame: 6 months
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity around the restoration stimulated by air blast measured by YES or NO scale
6 months
Pain due to dentin hypersensitivity (evaporative stimulus)
Time Frame: 12 months
Pain arising from dentin hypersensitivity around the restoration stimulated by air blast measured by YES or NO scale
12 months
Area of continuous movement of an explorer across the surface of the restoration
Time Frame: Immediately after procedure
Surface texture is highly polished or gritty containing supramicron-sized particles or Surface pitting is coarse to inhibit the continuous movement of an explorer across the surface
Immediately after procedure
Area of continuous movement of an explorer across the surface of the restoration
Time Frame: 6 months
Surface texture is highly polished or gritty containing supramicron-sized particles or Surface pitting is coarse to inhibit the continuous movement of an explorer across the surface
6 months
Area of continuous movement of an explorer across the surface of the restoration
Time Frame: 12 months
Surface texture is highly polished or gritty containing supramicron-sized particles or Surface pitting is coarse to inhibit the continuous movement of an explorer across the surface
12 months
Distance penetrated by the Explorer at the tooth restoration interface
Time Frame: Immediately after procedure
The explorer will be drawn across the surface of the restoration toward the tooth
Immediately after procedure
Distance penetrated by the Explorer at the tooth restoration interface
Time Frame: 6 months
The explorer will be drawn across the surface of the restoration toward the tooth
6 months
Distance penetrated by the Explorer at the tooth restoration interface
Time Frame: 12 months
The explorer will be drawn across the surface of the restoration toward the tooth
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Esraa Es Hussien, Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 22, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 18, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 28, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endodontically Treated Teeth

Clinical Trials on Reinforced composite for the fabrication of permanent, indirect restorations using a CAD/CAM grinding process.

Subscribe