Evaluation of Clinical Performance of 3D Printed Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Inlays

August 26, 2020 updated by: donia elshafey, Cairo University

Evaluation of Clinical Performance of 3D Printed Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Inlays Compared With Milled Indirect PEEK Inlays Versus Indirect Resin Composite Inlays Over One Year Period of Time (A Randomized Clinical Trial)

In patients using Inlay restorations will the use of 3D printed PEEK material and technique have superior clinical performance to milled PEEK one or to milled composite resin inlays, evaluation of restorations will be done at baseline, six months and 12 months using the modified US Public Health Service (USPHS) evaluation system

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study will be conducted in Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University; The operator in charge will be Donia Mamdouh Elshafey Patients will be selected from the outpatient clinic of the department Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University All cavity preparations will be performed with fine inlay burs according to inlay cavity principles. The walls facing each other will be prepared 5 to 6 degree divergent with 80 μm diamond burs and were finished with 25 μm diamond burs. All internal angles will be rounded and all edges will terminate in the enamel. The pulpal floor will be prepared at a depth of at least 1.5 mm. The teeth will be discarded if isthmus width was more than 2/3 of the distance between the tubercule tips, or if the walls are thinner than 2 mm before the preparation or thinner than 1.5 mm after the preparation. The caries affected dentin tissue at the cavity floor will be left. The teeth will be discarded from study if the pulp is exposed. To eliminate irregular areas in the cavities, a liner will be applied as a blockout material. Then the operator will adhere strictly to the manufacturer's instructions in the imaging, computer design and machining of the restorations either 3D printing or milling procedure.

The prepared teeth for the indirect restorations will be scanned with an optical 3D camera (CEREC Omnicam, Dentsply Sirona, Bensheim, Germany), inlays will be designed by a CAD software (CEREC SW 4.6.1, Dentsply Sirona), and files will be created in STL format (inLab CAD SW 18.1, Dentsply Sirona) then inlays will additively manufactured After the printing process is finished, the inlays will be immediately removed from the building platform and cooled down at room temperature. The inlay will be adapted individually to its cavity, and the occlusal surface will be recontoured. Such post processing also will be performed on the milled inlays. After all inlays are adequately adapted, they will be adhesively inserted into the cavities.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aging greater than or equal 18 years.
  • Patients with a high level of oral hygiene.
  • Each patient enrolled in the study had moderate to large size carious lesion or defective restoration to be replaced on a maxillary or mandibular permanent molar.
  • Patients with good likelihood of recall availability.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with general/systemic illness.
  • Pregnant or lactating females.
  • Concomitant participation in another research study.
  • Inability to comply with study procedures.
  • Heavy bruxism habits.
  • Last experience with allergic reactions against any components of the used materials.
  • Patients receiving orthodontic treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Poly ether ether ketone (PEEK)
Poly ether ether keton (PEEK) is acknowledged as a high-performance polymer in engineering & medical applications due to its favorable mechanical and chemical properties.
PEEK has been used in dentistry so far in certain fields as for, removable and fixed dental prostheses, implants, and implant abutments as well as orthodontic devices, whereas in literature, it is mostly mentioned in relation to prosthetics. PEEK was predominantly processed out of CAD/CAM-supported milled out of prefabricated blanks. Producing dental restorations via Additive manufacturing is still hardly widespread
Other: CADCAM poly ether ether ketone (PEEK)
PEEK was predominantly processed out of CAD/CAM-supported milled out of prefabricated blanks.
Increased demand for long-lasting restoration's properties have led to many improvements in the production techniques of posterior restorations such as CAD/CAM systems. This technique simplifies the production of indirect restorations and make it possible to use advanced materials as PEEK
Active Comparator: indirect resin composite
In CAD/CAM resin composite blocks, properties of flexibility and ease of use similar to that of resin composite are combined with durability and surface finish properties similar to that of ceramics
CADCAM resin composite blocks using milling process

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Marginal integrity
Time Frame: 12 months
Visual inspection with explorer and mirror, Distance penetrated by the Explorer at the tooth restoration interface
12 months
marginal discoloration
Time Frame: 12 months
Visual inspection with a mirror at 18 inches, the degree of mismatch from the normal range of tooth shades and translucency Visual inspection to check the proximity of the shade from the natural tooth
12 months
secondary caries
Time Frame: 12 months
Visual inspection of discoloration that occurs on the tooth after the filling has been used for a period of time
12 months
post operative sensitivity
Time Frame: 12 months
Asking the patient if there is any associated pain after adding the restoration
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Donia M elshafey, master, Cairo university

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

October 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Undecided: It is not yet known if there will be a plan to make IPD available.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

expecting to have all the data during october 2022

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

IPD through contacting the main author doniamamdouh@dentistry.cu.edu.eg.com

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Occlusal Caries

Clinical Trials on Poly ether ether ketone (PEEK)

Subscribe