Detection of Non-cavitated Occlusal Caries Lesions by Visual Inspection, LF, QLF and NILT

April 14, 2026 updated by: Neslihan Atmaca

In Vivo Detection of Non-cavitated Occlusal Caries Lesions by Visual Inspection, LF, QLF and NILT

This study aims to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of visual examination using ICDAS-II and three adjunctive optical methods-laser fluorescence (LF), near-infrared light transillumination (NILT), and quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF)-for the detection of non-cavitated occlusal caries lesions in children. A total of 51 children aged 6-14 years, including 320 posterior teeth, will be examined under standardized clinical conditions. Diagnostic performance will be assessed using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) values. The findings are expected to support the use of adjunctive diagnostic methods for early detection and minimally invasive management of occlusal caries.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This in vivo observational study was conducted to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of visual examination based on the International Caries Detection and Assessment System II (ICDAS-II) and three adjunctive optical methods-laser fluorescence (LF), near-infrared light transillumination (NILT), and quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF)-for the detection of non-cavitated occlusal caries lesions in posterior teeth of children.

The study included 51 children aged between 6 and 14 years, comprising a total of 320 posterior teeth (104 molars and 216 premolars) with sound or non-cavitated occlusal surfaces (ICDAS scores 0-2). All examinations were performed under standardized clinical conditions using calibrated examiners. Visual assessment was conducted according to ICDAS-II criteria, and optical evaluations were performed using DIAGNOdent pen (LF), DIAGNOcam (NILT), and Qraypen C (QLF).

QLF analysis included the calculation of fluorescence loss (ΔF), lesion area, and integrated fluorescence loss (ΔQ) using a predefined threshold. Diagnostic performance of each method was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with ICDAS-II serving as the reference standard. Inter-examiner agreement was assessed using kappa statistics.

The study aims to determine the comparative effectiveness of these diagnostic methods in detecting early occlusal caries and to provide clinically relevant evidence for improving diagnostic accuracy and supporting minimally invasive treatment strategies in pediatric dentistry.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maltepe
      • Istanbul, Maltepe, Turkey (Türkiye), 34854
        • Marmara Universty School of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Children aged 6-14 years attending the Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Marmara University, were recruited for this study. The study population included participants with at least one posterior tooth exhibiting either sound occlusal surfaces or non-cavitated occlusal caries lesions (ICDAS scores 0-2). All examinations were performed under standardized clinical conditions.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Voluntary agreement to participate in the study after the research procedures have been explained.
  • Being between 6 and 14 years of age.
  • Presence of at least one posterior tooth that is either sound with an ICDAS score of 0 or exhibits a non-cavitated occlusal carious lesion classified as ICDAS scores 1 or 2.
  • Having an occlusal surface suitable for standardized clinical and optical evaluation using Diagnodent Pen, Diagnocam, and QLF devices.
  • Absence of excessive plaque accumulation on the tooth surface to allow reliable measurements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Declining participation in the study.
  • Being younger than 6 years or older than 14 years.
  • Presence of cavitated carious lesions (ICDAS ≥ 3) or teeth with Class II or Class III carious involvement.
  • Prior restorative treatment or the presence of fissure sealants on the relevant occlusal surface, which would compromise accurate optical assessment.
  • Tooth surfaces with excessive plaque accumulation that would hinder proper evaluation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Children with non-cavitated occlusal caries
Children aged 6-14 years with sound or non-cavitated occlusal caries lesions (ICDAS scores 0-2) in posterior teeth. All participants underwent visual and optical diagnostic assessments under standardized clinical conditions.
Visual and optical diagnostic procedures were performed under standardized clinical conditions. These included visual examination using ICDAS II criteria, laser fluorescence measurement (DIAGNOdent Pen), near-infrared light transillumination (DIAGNOcam), and quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF; Qraypen C). All procedures were performed on cleaned and dried tooth surfaces without any therapeutic intervention.
Other Names:
  • ICDAS II
  • DIAGNOcam
  • DIAGNOdent pen
  • QLF

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy of caries detection methods
Time Frame: At baseline
Assessment of the diagnostic performance of visual examination (ICDAS-II), laser fluorescence (LF), near-infrared light transillumination (NILT), and quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) in detecting non-cavitated occlusal caries lesions. All methods were applied under standardized clinical conditions, and diagnostic outcomes were compared using ICDAS-II as the reference standard. Diagnostic parameters including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated for each method. Higher values indicate improved diagnostic performance in detecting early carious lesions.
At baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic performance of laser fluorescence (LF)
Time Frame: At baseline
Assessment of the diagnostic performance of laser fluorescence using DIAGNOdent pen for the detection of non-cavitated occlusal caries lesions. Measurements were obtained under standardized clinical conditions and compared with ICDAS-II scores. Diagnostic parameters including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. Higher values indicate better diagnostic performance.
At baseline
Diagnostic performance of near-infrared light transillumination (NILT)
Time Frame: At baseline
Assessment of the diagnostic performance of near-infrared light transillumination using DIAGNOcam for the detection of non-cavitated occlusal caries lesions. Images were obtained under standardized clinical conditions and evaluated in comparison with ICDAS-II scores. Diagnostic parameters including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. Higher values indicate better diagnostic performance.
At baseline
Diagnostic performance of quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF)
Time Frame: At baseline
Assessment of the diagnostic performance of quantitative light-induced fluorescence using Qraypen C for the detection of non-cavitated occlusal caries lesions. Fluorescence-based measurements were obtained under standardized clinical conditions and compared with ICDAS-II scores. Diagnostic parameters including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. Higher values indicate better diagnostic performance.
At baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Neslihan Atmaca, Doctor of Dental Surgery, Marmara Universty Faculty of Dentistry
  • Principal Investigator: Neslihan Atmaca, Doctor of Dental Surgery, Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data (including intraoral photographs and clinical evaluation scores) will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author, for scientific research purposes, following approval by the relevant ethics committee.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

De-identified individual participant data (IPD), along with supporting documents such as the study protocol and statistical analysis plan, will be available beginning 6 months after publication of the primary study results and will remain available for 5 years thereafter.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Requests for access to de-identified individual participant data and supporting documents will be considered for academic or scientific research purposes. Interested researchers must submit a written proposal detailing the planned analysis, including objectives and statistical methods. Requests will be reviewed by the principal investigator and institutional review board (IRB) representatives to ensure ethical compliance and scientific merit. A data use agreement must be signed prior to data release. Requests can be submitted via email to the corresponding author listed in the publication.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Caries

Clinical Trials on Diagnostic assessment of occlusal caries

Subscribe