Paediatric Chronic Tracheostomy Care: An Evaluation of an Innovative Competency-based Education Program for Community Health Care Providers

November 23, 2023 updated by: Reshma Amin, The Hospital for Sick Children
This project will evaluate a new course developed for nurses that provide care to children with breathing technology including breathing tubes and home breathing machines. The investigators plan to assess the nurses' knowledge and comfort of their ability to care for these medical technologies prior to the course as well as their ability to retain their knowledge 6 weeks and 6 months after course completion.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A structured program evaluation considering a hierarchy of outcomes is essential to determine whether the tracheostomy module is associated with improved knowledge and skills for CHPs (community health providers). This investigators proposed study is guided by the evaluation of knowledge acquisition and self-efficacy as a theoretical framework 24. CHPs' sense of self-efficacy or perceived capability in caring for this population is important to foster to potentially mitigate significant morbidity and mortality, while ultimately striving for safe, high-quality clinical care for these medically complex children.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X8
        • The Hospital for Sick Children

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Course registrants for the competency-based tracheostomy education course from VHA Home Healthcare agency
  • Consent to study participation
  • English speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

• Previously attended the competency-based tracheostomy course at SickKids

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
The knowledge and self-efficacy pre-tests will be completed at the start of the course and the post-test will be completed after the course at the end of the day. Study participants will complete tests independently using paper and pencil. Six weeks and six months post course completion, the knowledge and self-efficacy tests will be completed using REDcap (Research Electronic Data Capture), a secure web application for building and managing online surveys and databases or via telephone as per participant preference. Study participants will be sent a link to complete the tests online for the subsequent study visits. Study participants will receive 2 reminder emails (1 week apart) and 1 reminder phone call after the email reminders (if applicable) to complete the tests. Monthly telephone calls by the RA will be made to review the HCP experience logs.
A standardized competency-based education tracheostomy module has been developed by the investigator group in collaboration with Respiratory Medicine, Complex Care, Respiratory Therapy, Nursing Education, Family Advisory Network and the Learning Institute at SickKids. Instructional methods for the full module are based on principles of adult learning and evidence from the procedure education literature and include the use of interactive, small-group teaching, hands-on simulation-based learning stations with relevant equipment as well as a formal assessment of knowledge and skills using simulation. Pre-learning packages are sent to course attendees at the time of registration to facilitate higher level discussions on the day of the course. While investigators have rigorously developed the curriculum and evaluation measures, the course outcomes remain unknown.
No Intervention: Control
Study participants in the control arm will be offered complementary attendance in the Health Tech Junior enterostomy and vascular access competency based training course while awaiting their session. This is being done to minimize the potential confound of generalized improvements in self-efficacy that may occur as a result of participating in an 8 hour learning opportunity at SickKids. The control group will also complete the tracheostomy course during session 3 and 4 but this will occur outside the window of data collection for the study procedures. Data collection intervals as described above for the intervention group will be followed for the control group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The difference in the immediate knowledge retention scores of tracheostomy course participants versus controls at 6 week follow-up
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Knowledge Assessment - Tracheostomy Tubes: Multiple choice question (MCQ) tests have been developed by clinical experts. These tests focus on the important knowledge required to care for a child with a tracheostomy tube. Major themes include: i) clinical assessment; ii) safety; iii) general care; iv) troubleshooting/ emergency management. Higher Scores mean better knowledge retention.
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The difference in the sustained knowledge retention scores of course participants versus controls at 6 month follow-up
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 6 months
Knowledge Assessment - Tracheostomy Tubes: Multiple choice question (MCQ) tests have been developed by clinical experts. These tests focus on the important knowledge required to care for a child with a tracheostomy tube. Major themes include: i) clinical assessment; ii) safety; iii) general care; iv) troubleshooting/ emergency management. Higher Scores mean better knowledge retention.
6 weeks and 6 months
The difference in the self-efficacy scores of course participants versus controls at 6 weeks and 6 month follow-up
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 6 months
Self-Efficacy - Tracheostomy Tubes: A self-efficacy survey that is content relevant for tracheostomy tubes has been developed based on Bandura's framework 24. The survey consists of 16 items assessing the registrants' perceived capability to perform each aspect of care on a likert scale with a 0-100 response interval. Higher Scores mean more self-efficacy.
6 weeks and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1000057879

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Evaluation of HomeCare RN Respiratory Education

Clinical Trials on Tracheostomy Training Course

Subscribe