Early Tracheostomy in Ventilated Stroke Patients (SETPOINT)

April 23, 2014 updated by: Julian Boesel, Heidelberg University

Stroke-Related Early Tracheostomy vs. Prolonged Orotracheal Intubation in Neurocritical Care Trial

Patients with severe ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes, who require mechanical ventilation, have a particularly bad prognosis. If they require long-term ventilation, their orotracheal tube needs to be, like in any other intensive care patient, replaced by a shorter tracheal tube below the larynx. This so called tracheostomy might be associated with advantages such as less demand of narcotics and pain killers, less lesions in mouth and larynx, better mouth hygiene, safer airway, more patient comfort and earlier mobilisation. The best timepoint for tracheostomy in stroke, however, is not known. This study investigates the potential benefits of early tracheostomy in ventilated critically ill patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Tracheostomy is a common procedure in critical care patients. Advantages of a short tracheal tube compared to a long orotracheal one are the avoidance of laryngeal lesions and sinusitis, facilitation of nursing care and physiotherapy and the reduction of analgosedatives. The optimal point in time for tracheostomy is still unknown, but it is commonly done not later than 2-3 weeks and after one or several failed extubation trials. Studies in different sets of critical care patients have suggested additional advantages of early tracheostomy: less pneumonias and other complications, more patient comfort, less analgosedation, shorter duration of ventilation and of ICU stay. These questions have not been looked at in non-traumatic neurocritical care patients, although these might have a special weaning benefit by early tracheostomy, being mainly compromised in securing their airway, but not in breathing.

Method: Non-traumatic Neurocritical care patients with ischemic strokes, intracerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage so severly affected that 2 weeks of ventilation need are estimated, are principally eligible for the study. After randomization, one group receives tracheostomy within the first 3 days after intubation. The other group stays orotracheally intubated and is either weaned and extubated or receives tracheostomy within 7 to 14 days after intubation. Tracheostomy is done as percutaneous dilatation by neurologists.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Heidelberg, Germany, D-69120
        • NeuroIntensive Care Unit, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age > 18 years
  • informed consent from legal representative
  • non-traumatic cerebrovascular disease
  • Estimated ventilation need for at least 2 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age < 18 years
  • informed consent not obtainable
  • intubated for more than 3 days
  • death within 3 weeks likely
  • severe chronic pulmonary disease
  • severe chronic cardiac disease
  • emergency situation
  • intracranial pressure difficult to control
  • need for a permanent tracheostoma
  • contraindications for dilatative tracheostomy
  • severe coagulopathy
  • severe respiration difficulties
  • intubation/extubation/tube exchange difficulties

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Early Tracheostomy
Patients randomized to early tracheostomy receive (preferably dilatative) tracheostomy within 3 days from intubation.
Tracheostomy is performed as percutaneous dilatative tracheostomy by neurointensivists whenever possible. If anatomically or otherwise indicated, surgical tracheostomy is applied.
Active Comparator: Prolonged Intubation
Patients randomized to this arm will be tried to wean off the ventilator and get (an) extubation trial(s) if regarded feasible. In case of failure or non-feasibility, they receive tracheostomy between days 7 to 14 from intubation.
Tracheostomy is performed as percutaneous dilatative tracheostomy by neurointensivists whenever possible. If anatomically or otherwise indicated, surgical tracheostomy is applied.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay (ICU-LOS)
Time Frame: open
The primary endpoint is assessed as days from admission to until discharge from the intensive care unit.
open

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time of ICU-dependence
Time Frame: open
This secondary endpoint is assessed as days from admission to a pre-defined status that would allow discharge from ICU (absence of active infection, vasopressors, pulmonary and cardial instability etc.)
open
Functional Outcome
Time Frame: admission, discharge, at 6 months
This secondary endpoint is assessed as the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at the above named timepoints.
admission, discharge, at 6 months
Mortality
Time Frame: during stay, after 6 months
This secondary endpoint is assessed as time and type of death during the ICU-stay and 6 months after admission.
during stay, after 6 months
Hospital Length of Stay
Time Frame: open
This secondary endpoint is assessed as days spent at the recruiting hospital from admission to discharge.
open
Duration of Ventilation
Time Frame: open
This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days on the ventilator until the patient is ventilator-independent for 24 h.
open
Duration and Quality of Weaning
Time Frame: Within ventilation time
This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days spent under the possible application of a weaning protocol, and spent within specific phases of such a protocol.
Within ventilation time
Time of Analgosedation Dependence
Time Frame: within ICU-LOS
This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days requiring the application of sedatives and analgesics which are also specified.
within ICU-LOS
Vasopressor Dependence
Time Frame: within ICU-LOS
This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days spent under vasopressors.
within ICU-LOS
Time of Antibiotic Treatment
Time Frame: within ICU-LOS
This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days under antibiotic treatment
within ICU-LOS
Pneumonias
Time Frame: within ICU-LOS
This secondary endpoint is assessed as episodes (pre-defined by diagnostic criteria) of pneumonia.
within ICU-LOS
Occurrence and Duration of Sepsis
Time Frame: within ICU-LOS
This secondary endpoint is assessed as the number of episodes and duration of sepsis as pre-defined by diagnostic criteria.
within ICU-LOS
Number and type of complications associated with the procedure
Time Frame: 10 days post tracheostomy
This secondary endpoint is assessed as the number and types of complications arelated to tracheostomy (i.e. bleeding, mispositioning, malfunction, replacement demand,etc.).
10 days post tracheostomy
Cost of Treatment
Time Frame: within ICU-LOS
This secondary endpoint is assessed as the total ICU-costs etsimated by length of stay and severety-derived DRG-multiplicator of each individual patient.
within ICU-LOS

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bösel Julian, Dr, MD, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg
  • Study Chair: Thorsten Steiner, Prof, MD, Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

December 16, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 24, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2014

Last Verified

April 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ischemic Stroke

Clinical Trials on Early Tracheostomy

3
Subscribe