What is the Best Interval to Screen Women 45-49 and 70-74 for Breast Cancer? (MISS)

What is the Best Interval to Screen Women 45-49 and 70-74 for Breast Cancer

Italian, multicenter, study aimed at defining the best interval for screening women 45-49 and 70-74 years for Breast Cancer (BC). This research project includes (1) a controlled, prospective randomized non-inferiority trial to determine the optimal screening interval for women aged 45-49, with and without high mammographic density, (2) a retrospective data collection, with the same purpose, on screening performed by women aged 70-74, and (3) a qualitative research to define the best communication strategy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

According to the 2006 European guidelines, the target age for mammography screening is 50-69 years. For women aged 40-49, effectiveness is less and less certain. For those over 70, the most important concern is overdiagnosis. In Europe, so far, both age groups have been invited to screen only in a few countries and regional areas, including some Italian regions. Recently, new European guidelines have been published, developed in the framework of the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer. Although with caution, they recommend screening for both women aged 45-49 and those aged 70-74. The recommended interval is 2 or 3 years in the first case and 3 years in the second. The quality of the evidence on which these recommendations are based is defined as very low. Particularly for women aged 45-49, the new European guidelines indicate the need for a research effort, based on comparative studies, on the effectiveness of different screening intervals. This responsibility also falls on Italy, which is the only European country where women aged 45-49 are invited on an annual basis. Therefore, a research project is proposed which includes (1) a controlled, prospective randomized non-inferiority trial to determine the optimal screening interval for women aged 45-49, with and without high mammographic density, (2) a retrospective data collection, with the same purpose, on screening performed by women aged 70-74, and (3) a qualitative research to define the best communication strategy.

To define the best interval for screening women 45-49 years old a three-arm multicenter randomized non-inferiority trial will be conducted. Women signing the written informed consent will be randomized with a 1:1:1 ratio to:

Arm 1: 1-year screening interval; Arm 2: 2-year screening interval; Arm 3: tailored screening interval on the basis of breast density. Women with very dense breast (Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System -BI-RADS- category D) will be referred to 1-year interval whereas women with less dense breast to 2-year interval (Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System -BI-RADS- category A, B, C).

Enrollment will last 2.5 years and all women will be followed for 6 years. 60,000 women will be enrolled.

The primary objective is to compare the cumulative incidence of stage 2 or higher breast cancer between different screening intervals and this will be evaluated at the end of the 6-year follow-up period.

At the same time, data from all women registered in screening archives who have had a negative mammogram at the age of 69-71 years will be collected and analyzed. The data will be retrieved up to the age of 78 and will concern screening mammograms as well as other screening procedures (e.g. biopsies) and also mammograms performed outside the program. Data from screening and outpatient information systems as well as from cancer registries will be used.

To identify the best strategy to communicate changes in screening protocols, especially when the new protocol would be less intensive than the actual one, a qualitative research will be conducted. In particular the following steps will be considered:

  • Focus groups for discussing, with women from target population and health care professionals, key arguments identified in a preliminary research (i.e. scientific literature and case-studies research), with particular focus on how they should be translated into communication strategies.
  • Pre-test of the study's communication material through web-based semi-structured interviews to eligible women and key-informants.
  • Assessment of the effectiveness of the communication material through web-based semi-structured interviews to participants, that may bring insights on how planning communication strategies for the implementation of new screening protocols.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Firenze, Italy
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Istituto per lo studio, la prevenzione e la rete oncologica (ISPRO)
        • Contact:
          • Marco Zappa, MD
        • Contact:
          • Paola Mantellini, MD
      • Forlì, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • AUSL Romagna
        • Contact:
          • Fabio Falcini, MD
      • Torino, Italy
        • Not yet recruiting
        • AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza
        • Contact:
          • Livia Giordano, MD
    • FC
      • Meldola (FC), FC, Italy, 47014
        • Recruiting
        • Irst Irccs
        • Contact:
          • Fabio Falcini, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 49 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Women invited for their first or second mammography (45 or 46 y/o) presenting for screening;
  2. Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits;
  3. Written informed consent obtained prior to performing any protocol-related procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy status;
  2. Personal history of prior breast carcinoma, either invasive or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosis;
  3. Ascertained heredo-familial risk according to the standard family history used in screening programs;
  4. Participation in another clinical trial on BC screening;
  5. Inability to provide signed informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: 1-year screening interval
Women will follow the normal screening program (they will be invited to screen every year)
Experimental: 2-year screening interval
Women will be invited to screen every two years
women will be screened for breast cancer using tomosynthesis and synthetic 2D mammography with an interval defined according to their randomization arm for a follow-up period of 6 years;
Experimental: 3-tailored screening interval
the screening interval will be decided on the basis of breast density. Women with very dense breast (BI-RADS category D) will be referred to 1-year interval whereas women with less dense breast to 2-year interval (BI-RADS category A, B, C)
women will be screened for breast cancer using tomosynthesis and synthetic 2D mammography with an interval defined according to their randomization arm for a follow-up period of 6 years;

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare the cumulative incidence of stage 2 or higher breast cancer between different screening intervals
Time Frame: 6 years
Cumulative breast cancer risk will computed as the ratio between the number of stage 2 or higher cancers and the total number of women in the arm. The comparison between arms will be performed using the two proportion Z-test. 95% confidence intervals will also be computed
6 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participation in screening
Time Frame: 6 years
number of participating women within 3 months since invitation)/(total invited women). It will be computed for each screening round and overall as average of round participation
6 years
contamination proportion (use of mammography) within two screening rounds (in women referred to 2-year interval)
Time Frame: 6 years
number of women referred to 2-year interval and performing a mammogram within two screening round)/number of women referred to 2-year interval The indicator will be computed only for women randomized to arm 2 and for women referred to 2-year arm in arm 3
6 years
Breast cancer detection
Time Frame: 6 years
number of women with BC diagnosis at screening / number of total screened women
6 years
overall recall rate
Time Frame: 6 years
number of women recalled for further assessment/ number of total screened women.
6 years
rate of recall with an invasive procedure (biopsy)
Time Frame: 6 years
number of women recalled for further assessment with a biopsy/ number of total screened women
6 years
interval Breast Cancer rate
Time Frame: 6 years
number of cancers occurring after a negative mammography and before the date of the next planned appointment/ number of total screened women
6 years
cumulative Breast Cancer incidence
Time Frame: 6 years
Cumulative incidence of BC including baseline test
6 years
resource expenditure
Time Frame: 6 years

Mean costs for each attending woman in every of the following processes:

Coordination and organization; Invitation; First level mammography; Diagnostic assessment (invasive and non invasive)

6 years
prevalence of dense breast in the target population
Time Frame: 6 years
women with BI-RADS A, B, C, and D/total women included in the tailored arm
6 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Fabio Falcini, MD, Irst Irccs
  • Principal Investigator: Marco Zappa, MD, ISPRO Firenze
  • Principal Investigator: Livia Giordano, MD, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 6, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 12, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRST174.22

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Subscribe