Data on the Prevention of Complications of Prophylactic Intravenous Hydration in Patients With eGFR < 30 (CVP)

January 13, 2023 updated by: Maastricht University Medical Center

Data on the Prevention of Complications of Prophylactic Intravenous Hydration in Patients With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) < 30 ml/Min/1.73m2 From the Maastricht UMC+ Contrast Voorbereidings Polikliniek

At Maastricht University Medical Centre (Maastricht UMC+) a specialised unit was established where a dual screening process including both renal and cardiac parameters is used to minimize the risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury as well as the risk of prophylactic hydration in eGFR<30mL/min/1.73m2 patients. Very little data exists on patients with eGFR <30mL/min/1.73m2 in this context. The current study aims to describe post-contrast outcomes of patients to whom this screening method has been applied.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A large retrospective observational study, including 4-years of elective procedures with intravascular iodinated contrast administration in eGFR<30mL/min/1.73m2 patients at Maastricht UMC+, found that prophylactic intravenous hydration might confer some benefit for renal function. For patients who had received prophylactic hydration, adjusted odds ratios for risk of post-contrast acute kidney injury, and 1-month eGFR decline and dialysis were all lower than 1. These results were not significant, but suggest that hydration may be protective. On the other hand, adjusted odds ratios for all-cause mortality within 1-month post-contrast were higher than 1, with point estimates indicating a trend toward higher risk of short-term mortality after prophylaxis as compared to no prophylaxis. Confounding by indication may be responsible for the observed increased risk of short-term mortality, but complications of the prophylaxis did contribute towards the risk. Amongst the 281 eGFR<30mL/min/1.73m2 prophylaxis patients studied, 18 (6.4%) serious complications occurred: 3 arrhythmias, and 15 heart failures including 5 deaths. Of all 21 deaths recorded for the prophylaxis patients, 24% (5/21) were considered to be related to intravenous fluids. An exploration of differences in baseline characteristics between patients with and without serious complications suggested that these can be avoided if cardiac function parameters are given extra and individual attention before deciding whether to administer prophylaxis to high-risk patients with eGFR<30mL/min/1.73m2. At Maastricht UMC+ a specialised unit (called the CVP) was established where a dual screening process including both renal and cardiac parameters is used to minimize the risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury as well as the risk of prophylactic hydration in eGFR<30mL/min/1.73m2 patients. In order to enable real function follow-up, the CVP registers data on all patients with eGFR <30 receiving intravascular iodinated contrast material, including acute patients who did not receive the dual screening process prior to prophylactic intravenous hydration. The current study aims to describe post-contrast outcomes of patients to whom the CVP screening method has been applied and to compare them to earlier outcomes of patients to whom the screening was not applied.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

443

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patients with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2 in absence of dialysis referred for a procedure with intravascular administration of iodinated contrast material at Maastricht UMC+

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2 in absence of dialysis
  • referred for a procedure with intravascular administration of iodinated contrast material at Maastricht UMC+

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age <18 years
  • dialysis or pre-dialysis
  • emergency or intensive care status

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
complications of prophylactic intravenous hydration
Time Frame: 14 days
serious complications of prophylactic intravenous hydration (heart failure, arrhythmia)
14 days
complications of prophylactic intravenous hydration 2
Time Frame: 14 days
deaths with primary cause heart failure (and no known other underlying cause) within 14 days post-contrast
14 days
complications of prophylactic intravenous hydration 3
Time Frame: 14 days
proportion of all deaths in prophylaxis subgroups with primary cause heart failure within 14 days
14 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
incidence of post-contrast acute kidney injury
Time Frame: 6 days
acute increase in serum creatinine within 5 days post-contrast
6 days
incidences of 1-month post-contrast dialysis and mortality
Time Frame: 35 days
incidences of dialysis and all-cause mortality within post-contrast
35 days
post-contrast change in eGFR
Time Frame: 6 days
change in eGFR from baseline post-contrast
6 days
prophylaxis administered
Time Frame: 1 day
percentage of patients receiving standard, adapted and no prophylactic intravenous hydration
1 day
post-contrast AKI according to KDIGO definition
Time Frame: 6 days
post-contrast AKI according to KDIGO definition
6 days
ODDS ratios prophylaxis
Time Frame: 1 month
where possible odds ratios for standard prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis and adapted prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis will be calculated for post-contrast acute kidney injury, 1-month dialysis and death
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 6, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

January 6, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 7, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Contrast-induced Nephropathy

Clinical Trials on CVP screening

3
Subscribe