Aged Simulation Suit Among Physiotherapy Students

April 19, 2022 updated by: Kadirhan Ozdemir, PT, PhD., Izmir Bakircay University

Empathy and Attitude Upon An Aged Body: Aged Simulation Suit Among Undergraduate Physiotherapy Students

Turkey is the second fastest aging country in the world. According to the Turkey Statistical Institute's data, the distribution of the population aged 65 and over is expected to be 25.6% in 2080. Today, studies have been started to determine the empathy and attitudes of the young generation, especially the younger generation, towards older individuals and to develop them. In this context, it is thought that the simulation designed to simulate the aging process of human beings may have a positive effect on students' understanding of aging and perception of aging. In this study, the effect of aged simulation suit on empathy and attitudes towards elderly people will be determined in Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation undergraduate students.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Attitude is defined as a positive or negative assessment of people, objects or events that reflect one's knowledge, emotions, and behavior towards people, objects or events. Physical degeneration in the elderly can easily lead to prejudice or discrimination against older adults, especially in the younger generation. The younger generation sees older adults as a different group and labels them with negative traits. However, education has an important role in changing attitudes towards older people and developing professional cultures. In this context, the positive attitudes and behaviors of healthcare professionals (doctors, nurses, physiotherapists, etc.) starting from the pre-graduation period are of great importance for quality health services.

Empathy, which consists of emotional, cognitive, operational, and physiological behavior and reaction compounds, was mostly evaluated as a process of relationships and attitudes. Healthcare providers should be able to grasp patients' perspectives (cognitive empathy) and relate to their emotions and experiences (emotional empathy). It can be difficult to understand other people's perspectives, especially if they have not experienced disability due to aging or disease. It has been reported in the literature that health professionals lack empathy and understanding towards older individuals. It has been suggested that empathy in patient care can be developed at a basic level and through vocational education. Defining the attitudes of healthcare professionals and students and implementing new educational strategies that encourage positive attitudes towards the elderly while they are still students are important for increasing the quality of healthcare offered to the elderly and developing a positive attitude.

In medical and health sciences undergraduate education, there has been a lack of specific lessons on which directly focuses empathy, yet simulation-based modalities have been shown to be impacted on students' perceptions regarding attitude and empathy.

Thus, this study aims to assess the attitude and empathy level toward on elderly people among health sciences undergraduate students. The intervention which is mainly based upon wearing an aged simulation suit through some activities related to independent living and mobility has been planned to performed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

63

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • İzmir, Turkey, 06580
        • Kadirhan Ozdemir

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 24 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being volunteer to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having an advanced visual and balance problems especially associated with inner ear

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group
The aged simulation suit (Sakamoto Model M716, Tokyo, Japan) will be worn by students. The simulation suit consist of a several items such as loads, a soft material band with Velcro, glasses, ear plugs, gloves, belts and a cane. All the items are need to simulate one's posture just like in elderly person. Small, medium and large sizes of suits are provided by the company thereby each suit is suitable for each student related to their wearing size. Prior to this study, a total of three sets of suits will be gathered. Then, each student will perform each pre-defined scenarios step by step after the suit is worn. During the activities no help or leading will be given to the students. However, one of the researchers will supervise the students during the activities so that to integrate a safe platform. In addition, each student will be informed that if he/she can terminate the activity whenever it is required.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline The Jefferson Scale of Empathy Health Professions Students immediately after the intervention
Time Frame: At baseline and immediately after the intervention
The Jefferson Scale of Empathy Health Professions Students (JSE-HPS) was originally developed by Jefferson University intended to measure empathy levels for health professionals. The JSE-HPS consists of a total 20-items each scored by seven point Likert Scale as 1: "Strongly disagree" through 7: "Strongly agree". 10 out of 20 items are scored directly according to the Likert weights while the other half are reversely scored. The minimum and maximum scores for JSE-HPS can be reached to 20 and 140, respectively. The more the higher scores indicate more empathic aspect or vice versa.
At baseline and immediately after the intervention
Change from Baseline Kogan's Attitude towards Old People scale immediately after the intervention
Time Frame: At baseline and immediately after the intervention
The scale consists a total of 34 items which was originally developed by Kogan et al. The same as in JSE-HPS, seventeen items which are directly scored as Likert weights according to the 6 point Likert scale in which 1: "Strongly Disagree" through 6: "Strongly agree" while the rest of seventeen items are scored reversely. The minimum and maximum points of Kogan's Attitude towards Old People (KAOP) scale can be 34 and 238. The interpretation of score of KAOP scale is linear in which higher scores indicate a more positive attitude while lower scores indicate the worse. Reliability of the total KAOP scale were found in different studies as 0.87 and 0.89.
At baseline and immediately after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Semi-structure Interview
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
Experiences and emotions regarding the aged simulation suit will be collected from the students by asking reflective questions for each student one by one. Qualitative discussion will be made by taking experiences and perceptions of students upon the aged simulation suit.
Immediately after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 15, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 25, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 18, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020/14

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Attitude

Clinical Trials on Aged Simulation Suit

Subscribe