Long-term Follow up in Survivors of Critical Illness

Long-term Follow-up in Survivors of Critical Illness: An Longitudinal Assessment of Critically Ill Patients Discharged Alive From the Intensive Care Unit

Survivors of critical illness may suffer from persistent physical, cognitive and mental impairments, such as muscle weakness, dysfunction in the memory and executive domains, post-traumatic stress disorders, depression, and anxiety. This syndrome is referred to as Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS).

This study aims to assess the frequency of impairments, their evolution over time, and to understand the pathogenetic mechanisms and the association between long-term sequelae and acute care events.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

PICS describes 'new or worsening impairments in physical, cognitive or mental health status arising after critical illness and persisting beyond acute care hospitalization'. Different critical care professional and scientific societies have identified long-term functional outcomes after critical illness as an important target for research and clinical improvements, and there is general agreement that research on PICS should be a priority for the critical care community.

Post-ICU subjects may experience physical problems, such as muscles weakness and wasting, caused by prolonged bed rest and immobility during the ICU stay and by critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy developing during the acute illness; organ dysfunction; chronic pain; mental health problems including depression, anxiety or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD); and neurocognitive impairments which are predominantly represented by memory dysfunction and executive function impairment. The impact of these problems on the subject's health status is huge, which reduced quality of life, and impaired functional status, and daily functioning.

Many survivors incur substantial healthcare costs, lose employment, and find their social networks wholly changed. The costs to subjects and families are high: ICU survivorship is associated with decreased return to work, and the loss of earnings plagues both patients and caregivers.

Prior studies in which researchers have examined outcomes among ICU survivors have been mainly restricted their assessments to specific patient populations and have used only limited outcome measures or the follow-up period was relatively short-term. Moreover, few studies have explored the association between acute care events and long-term sequelae as well as the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.

The researchers appertaining to the present study implemented a follow-up clinic to describe the frequency of physical, cognitive, and mental impairments and their evolution over time in subjects surviving critical illness. The researchers also aim at understanding the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying these impairments and their association with acute care events.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

160

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brescia, Italy, 25123
        • Recruiting
        • ASST- Spedali Civili di Brescia
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

We will enroll all patients admitted to the ICUs with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and ARDS.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- All COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICUs of the Spedali Civili University Hospital in Brescia, Italy.

Exclusion Criteria:

- None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score
Time Frame: 3 months
Medical Research Council (MRC)-sum score evaluates global muscle strength, and it has been proposed in PICS syndrome post-COVID-19. Manual strength of six muscle groups (shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, wrist extension, hip flexion, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion) is evaluated on both sides using the MRC-sumscore. The summation of scores gives MRC-sumscore, ranging from 0 to 60. This score reliably identifies significant weakness (< 48) and even better in severe weakness (<36).
3 months
Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score
Time Frame: 6 months
Medical Research Council (MRC)-sum score evaluates global muscle strength, and it has been proposed in PICS syndrome post-COVID-19. Manual strength of six muscle groups (shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, wrist extension, hip flexion, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion) is evaluated on both sides using the MRC-sumscore. The summation of scores gives MRC-sumscore, ranging from 0 to 60. This score reliably identifies significant weakness (< 48) and even better in severe weakness (<36).
6 months
Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score
Time Frame: 12 months
Medical Research Council (MRC)-sum score evaluates global muscle strength, and it has been proposed in PICS syndrome post-COVID-19. Manual strength of six muscle groups (shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, wrist extension, hip flexion, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion) is evaluated on both sides using the MRC-sumscore. The summation of scores gives MRC-sumscore, ranging from 0 to 60. This score reliably identifies significant weakness (< 48) and even better in severe weakness (<36).
12 months
Dominand Handgrip Test
Time Frame: 3 months
Dynamometry will be considered normal if >11Kg in Male and 7.5 kg in Female. Moreover, the researcher will standardized the result as percentage of the predicted normal value (PNV) as follow: <20% PNV; 20%<=PNV< 40%; 40%<=PNV< 60%; 60%<= PNV< 80%, and >=80 PNV. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2008.04.004]
3 months
Dominand Handgrip Test
Time Frame: 6 months
Dynamometry will be considered normal if >11Kg in Male and 7.5 kg in Female. Moreover, the researcher will standardized the result as percentage of the predicted normal value (PNV) as follow: <20% PNV; 20%<=PNV< 40%; 40%<=PNV< 60%; 60%<= PNV< 80%, and >=80 PNV. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2008.04.004]
6 months
Dominand Handgrip Test
Time Frame: 12 months
Dynamometry will be considered normal if >11Kg in Male and 7.5 kg in Female. Moreover, the researcher will standardized the result as percentage of the predicted normal value (PNV) as follow: <20% PNV; 20%<=PNV< 40%; 40%<=PNV< 60%; 60%<= PNV< 80%, and >=80 PNV. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2008.04.004]
12 months
Six Minutes Walking Test
Time Frame: 3 months
Six-minute walking test will be performed in accordance with the America Thoracic Society recommendations and it will be adjusted for age, sex, height, and body weight
3 months
Six Minutes Walking Test
Time Frame: 6 months
Six-minute walking test will be performed in accordance with the America Thoracic Society recommendations and it will be adjusted for age, sex, height, and body weight
6 months
SIX Minutes Walking Test
Time Frame: 12 months
Six-minute walking test will be performed in accordance with the America Thoracic Society recommendations and it will be adjusted for age, sex, height, and body weight
12 months
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
Time Frame: 3 months
The Fatigue severity score is a nine-item unidimensional questionnaire that measures the severity of fatigue symptoms on a seven-point ordinal scale (maximum score of seven). An FSS ≥36 will be considered as an indicator of fatigue.
3 months
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
Time Frame: 6 months
The Fatigue severity score is a nine-item unidimensional questionnaire that measures the severity of fatigue symptoms on a seven-point ordinal scale (maximum score of seven). An FSS ≥36 will be considered as an indicator of fatigue.
6 months
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
Time Frame: 12 months
The Fatigue severity score is a nine-item unidimensional questionnaire that measures the severity of fatigue symptoms on a seven-point ordinal scale (maximum score of seven). An FSS ≥36 will be considered as an indicator of fatigue.
12 months
Elettromyography
Time Frame: 3 months
Simplified peroneal nerve test (PENT)wiil be used to diagnose a critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy; a value <5.26 mV present in both legs was considered as abnormal.
3 months
Elettromyography
Time Frame: 6 months
Simplified peroneal nerve test (PENT)wiil be used to diagnose a critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy; a value <5.26 mV present in both legs was considered as abnormal.
6 months
Elettromyography
Time Frame: 12 months
Simplified peroneal nerve test (PENT)wiil be used to diagnose a critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy; a value <5.26 mV present in both legs was considered as abnormal.
12 months
Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test (MoCA)
Time Frame: 3 months
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is divided into several cognitive domains with variable scoring among them, adding up to a maximum total of 30 points if all responses are correct. The scale is divided into Visuospatial and executive functioning (5 points), animal naming (3 points), attention (6 points), language (3 points), abstraction (2 points), delayed recall (short-term memory, 5 points), and orientation (6 points). To correct for educational effects found in the original study, one point is added if the subject has less than 12 years of education. The suggested cutoff score for normalcy in the MoCA is 26/30. When patients scored less than 26, we used the following classification: 18-25 = mild cognitive impairment, 10-17= moderate cognitive impairment, and less than 10= severe cognitive impairment
3 months
Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test (MoCA)
Time Frame: 6 months
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is divided into several cognitive domains with variable scoring among them, adding up to a maximum total of 30 points if all responses are correct. The scale is divided into Visuospatial and executive functioning (5 points), animal naming (3 points), attention (6 points), language (3 points), abstraction (2 points), delayed recall (short-term memory, 5 points), and orientation (6 points). To correct for educational effects found in the original study, one point is added if the subject has less than 12 years of education. The suggested cutoff score for normalcy in the MoCA is 26/30. When patients scored less than 26, we used the following classification: 18-25 = mild cognitive impairment, 10-17= moderate cognitive impairment, and less than 10= severe cognitive impairment
6 months
Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test (MoCA)
Time Frame: 12 months
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is divided into several cognitive domains with variable scoring among them, adding up to a maximum total of 30 points if all responses are correct. The scale is divided into Visuospatial and executive functioning (5 points), animal naming (3 points), attention (6 points), language (3 points), abstraction (2 points), delayed recall (short-term memory, 5 points), and orientation (6 points). To correct for educational effects found in the original study, one point is added if the subject has less than 12 years of education. The suggested cutoff score for normalcy in the MoCA is 26/30. When patients scored less than 26, we used the following classification: 18-25 = mild cognitive impairment, 10-17= moderate cognitive impairment, and less than 10= severe cognitive impairment
12 months
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: 3 months
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was classified as follow: HADS for depression: 0-7 = Normal 8-10 = Borderline abnormal (borderline case) 11-21 = Abnormal (case) and HADS Anxiety: 0-7 = Normal 8-10 = Borderline abnormal (borderline case) 11-21 = Abnormal (case).
3 months
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: 6 months
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was classified as follow: HADS for depression: 0-7 = Normal 8-10 = Borderline abnormal (borderline case) 11-21 = Abnormal (case) and HADS Anxiety: 0-7 = Normal 8-10 = Borderline abnormal (borderline case) 11-21 = Abnormal (case).
6 months
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: 12 months
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was classified as follow: HADS for depression: 0-7 = Normal 8-10 = Borderline abnormal (borderline case) 11-21 = Abnormal (case) and HADS Anxiety: 0-7 = Normal 8-10 = Borderline abnormal (borderline case) 11-21 = Abnormal (case).
12 months
The The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)
Time Frame: 3 months
The PCL-5 is a self-report measure that assesses the presence and severity of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Items on the PCL-5 correspond with DSM-5 criteria for PTSD. PTSD >32 is strongly associated with the presence of PTSD.
3 months
The The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)
Time Frame: 6 months
The PCL-5 is a self-report measure that assesses the presence and severity of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Items on the PCL-5 correspond with DSM-5 criteria for PTSD. PTSD >32 is strongly associated with the presence of PTSD.
6 months
The The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)
Time Frame: 12 months
The PCL-5 is a self-report measure that assesses the presence and severity of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Items on the PCL-5 correspond with DSM-5 criteria for PTSD. PTSD >32 is strongly associated with the presence of PTSD.
12 months
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
Time Frame: 3 months
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) is a brief instrument that was designed to assess the severity of both nighttime and daytime components of insomnia. It is available in several languages and is increasingly used as a metric of treatment response in clinical research. ISI will be classified as follows: No clinically significant insomnia (0-7), Subthreshold insomnia (8-14), Moderate insomnia (15-21), and severe insomnia (22-28).
3 months
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
Time Frame: 6 months
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) is a brief instrument that was designed to assess the severity of both nighttime and daytime components of insomnia. It is available in several languages and is increasingly used as a metric of treatment response in clinical research. ISI will be classified as follows: No clinically significant insomnia (0-7), Subthreshold insomnia (8-14), Moderate insomnia (15-21), and severe insomnia (22-28).
6 months
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
Time Frame: 12 months
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) is a brief instrument that was designed to assess the severity of both nighttime and daytime components of insomnia. It is available in several languages and is increasingly used as a metric of treatment response in clinical research. ISI will be classified as follows: No clinically significant insomnia (0-7), Subthreshold insomnia (8-14), Moderate insomnia (15-21), and severe insomnia (22-28).
12 months
The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: 3 months

The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a widely used and extensively validated generic QOL measure that consists of 8 multiple-item domains. We applied two different methods for scoring. Firstly, for each item, a scale between 0-100 will be calculated and the percentage of predicted value has been calculated, based on the Italian normalized value.

The second method will be been the calculation ofthe physical component summary (PCS) and the mental component summary (MCS), as described by Taft et al. After the eight scale scores are calculated, a z-score is determined for each by subtracting the scale mean of a sample of the Italian general population from an individual's scale score and then dividing by the standard deviation from the Italian general population. Each of the eight z-scores is then multiplied by the corresponding factor scoring coefficient for the scale.

3 months
The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: 6 months

The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a widely used and extensively validated generic QOL measure that consists of 8 multiple-item domains. We applied two different methods for scoring. Firstly, for each item, a scale between 0-100 will be calculated and the percentage of predicted value has been calculated, based on the Italian normalized value.

The second method will be been the calculation ofthe physical component summary (PCS) and the mental component summary (MCS), as described by Taft et al. After the eight scale scores are calculated, a z-score is determined for each by subtracting the scale mean of a sample of the Italian general population from an individual's scale score and then dividing by the standard deviation from the Italian general population. Each of the eight z-scores is then multiplied by the corresponding factor scoring coefficient for the scale.

6 months
The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: 12 months

The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a widely used and extensively validated generic QOL measure that consists of 8 multiple-item domains. We applied two different methods for scoring. Firstly, for each item, a scale between 0-100 will be calculated and the percentage of predicted value has been calculated, based on the Italian normalized value.

The second method will be been the calculation ofthe physical component summary (PCS) and the mental component summary (MCS), as described by Taft et al. After the eight scale scores are calculated, a z-score is determined for each by subtracting the scale mean of a sample of the Italian general population from an individual's scale score and then dividing by the standard deviation from the Italian general population. Each of the eight z-scores is then multiplied by the corresponding factor scoring coefficient for the scale.

12 months
Barthel Index (BI)
Time Frame: 3 months
BI will be classified as follow: Independent (80-100); Minimally dependent (60-79);, Partially dependent (40-59), Very dependent (20-39); and Totally dependent (<20).
3 months
Barthel Index (BI)
Time Frame: 6 months
BI will be classified as follow: Independent (80-100); Minimally dependent (60-79);, Partially dependent (40-59), Very dependent (20-39); and Totally dependent (<20).
6 months
Barthel Index (BI)
Time Frame: 12 months
BI will be classified as follow: Independent (80-100); Minimally dependent (60-79);, Partially dependent (40-59), Very dependent (20-39); and Totally dependent (<20).
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 30, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 30, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NP2595

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No IPD will be shared

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Intensive Care Unit Syndrome

Subscribe