Continuous Erector Spinae Block for Post Analgesia in Pediatric Patients

February 1, 2023 updated by: Fatma Adel El sherif,MD, Assiut University

Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Local Anesthetic Infusion for Postoperative Analgesia in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Nephrectomy: Randomized Controlled Study

The aim of this study is to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block in pediatric cancer patients undergoing open nephrectomy

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

  • Sixty patients will be included in this prospective randomized study. The patients will be allocated into two groups: the ESPB group (group E, n = 30) and the tramal group (group T, n =30).
  • All patients will receive standard general anesthesia. Ultrasound-guided ESPB will be performed to group erector spinae plane block

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Assuit, Egypt, 171516
        • South Egypt Cancer instIitute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 7 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Physical status ASA II.
  • Patients (age 2-7yrs) scheduled for open nephrectomy for malignant kidney tumors

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of psychological disorders.

    • Known sensitivity or contraindication to local anesthetics.
    • Localized infection at the site of block.
    • patients with coagulopathy or an (INR ≥ 2)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Erector spinae group
patient will be placed in a sitting position under complete aseptic condition and a cover sheath will be used for the ultrasound probe with an appropriate amount of lubricating gel applied on the probe, a high-frequency linear ultrasound transducer will be placed in a longitudinal orientation 3 cm lateral to the L3 spinous process. This should reveal three muscles superficial to the hyperechoic transverse process shadow as follows: trapezius, rhomboid major, and erector spinae.
The patient will be placed in a sitting position under complete aseptic condition and a cover sheath will be used for the ultrasound probe with an appropriate amount of lubricating gel applied on the probe, a high-frequency linear ultrasound transducer will be placed in a longitudinal orientation 3 cm lateral to the L3 spinous process. This should reveal three muscles superficial to the hyperechoic transverse process shadow as follows: trapezius, rhomboid major, and erector spinae. then injecte bupivacaine hydrochloride
Other Names:
  • erector spinae block
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Opioid GROUP
Patient in group T will intravenously administrate dose of 1 mg/kg/8hr tramal ( opioid) to be increased upon patient needs up to 2mg/kg/6hr as rescue analgesic.
Patients in group Tramadol will intravenously administrate dose of 1 mg/kg/8hr tramal to be increased upon patient needs up to 2mg/kg/6hr as rescue analgesic
Other Names:
  • opioid group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
total amount of opioid consumption in milligram
Time Frame: 48 hours
total amount of opioid consumption in the frist 48hours postoperative
48 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: fatma el sherif, MD, Assiut University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 20, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 12, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 23, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 3, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pediatric Cancer

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine Hydrochloride

3
Subscribe