Nudging Providers to Curtail Dangerous Opioid Prescribing: A Trial to Investigate Mechanisms

September 16, 2022 updated by: Columbia University
Despite an enormous policy response, opioid prescribing remains well above historical levels and harms from opioids continue to mount. Nearly all states have Prescription Monitoring Programs (PMPs) to facilitate safer prescribing of opioids and other drugs, but research suggests these systems only deliver benefits when health care professionals are required to use them. Even with PMP mandates in place, providers may be unaware of the dangers of co-prescribing opioids with benzodiazepines or gabapentinoids, which include increased risk of overdose and death. Working with the Minnesota state government, the investigators will mail letters to guideline-discordant opioid prescribers that either highlight an upcoming legally mandated requirement to check the PMP before prescribing an opioid, inform and educate providers about patients filling concurrent prescriptions and the dangers of such co-prescribing, or both. Study participants will be randomized to receive no intervention or one of the three treatment letters. Using administrative data, the investigators will track effects of the letters on not only prescribing but also PMP usage and queries. Findings form the multiplicity of treatment messages and outcomes will shed light on the mechanisms driving overprescribing. Results will inform future work by state and local policymakers to make opioid prescribing safer.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55414
        • Minnesota Board of Pharmacy
      • Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States, 55155
        • Minnesota Management and Budget Agency

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Wrote concurrent prescription for opioids and benzodiazepines OR opioids and gabapentinoids

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Specialization in oncology or palliative medicine

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PMP Use Mandate
A letter with reminders about the mandate to check the PMP when prescribing opioids.
Experimental: Prescribing Information
A letter with information about the prescriber's patients who received co-prescriptions. The letters will provide clinical background on the harms of co-prescribing and encourage prescribers to avoid co-prescribing in the future.
Experimental: Prescribing Information + PMP Use Mandate
A letter combining the content of the PMP Use Mandate Letter and the Prescribing Information Letter. This letter will remind prescribers about the PMP use mandate and provide information about the prescriber's patients who received co-prescriptions.
No Intervention: Control / As-Usual

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Count of Patients with Co-Prescriptions
Time Frame: 60 days
The number of patients with co-prescriptions from the prescriber in the 60 days after the letters are sent.
60 days
Rate of Prescribers Checking PMP
Time Frame: 60 days
Indicator for whether the prescriber checks the PMP at least once in the 60 days after the letters are sent.
60 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Adam Sacarny, PhD, Columbia University
  • Principal Investigator: Mireille Jacobson, PhD, University of Southern California
  • Principal Investigator: David Powell, PhD, RAND

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 12, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

July 12, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Opioid Use

Clinical Trials on PMP Use Mandate Letter

3
Subscribe