Family History in a Singapore Oncology Population

February 6, 2025 updated by: Duke University

Development and Clinical Implementation Pilot of an Oncology-specific Risk Assessment Tool in Singapore

This study will create a Breast Cancer Clinical Decision Support Module in MeTree and validate and pilot the Breast Cancer Clinical Decision Support Module in a clinical setting within SingHealth. This proposal leverages the larger collaborative work already started to explore clinically meaningful applications of MeTree within SingHealth. While MeTree has been shown to be clinically effective within primary care clinics in the U.S., SingHealth's oncologists are interested in leveraging MeTree's risk assessment features both to establish a more organized, standardized, and systematic process for collecting information to enhance cancer management and to maximize the advances in precision medicine for the benefit of cancer patients. Therefore, in collaboration with SingHealth oncologist Dr.Ngeow, the principal investigators propose to explore, develop, and pilot a prototype MeTree cancer module.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The value of precision medicine within clinical care is becoming increasingly more evident. Nowhere is this clearer than in the field of oncology. With recognition of the value of genetics in clinical care, the National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS) established a Cancer Genetics Service in 2006. This service performs a valuable function within NCCS by overseeing the care of patients found to have hereditary cancer syndromes and providing consultation to clinical oncologists on the appropriate, targeted role of genetic testing within cancer care. While the Cancer Genetics Service is available to all clinicians within NCCS, with the continually growing and evolving understanding of how genetics plays a role in cancer and cancer treatment, there are no clear, consistent guidelines on when to request consultation. This leads to both over- and underutilization of services with some patients being referred who do not require it and others being missed whose care would benefit from the expertise of a cancer geneticist.

In an effort to address these inconsistencies in care, the study team proposes to further develop and evaluate the implementation of a Duke-developed precision medicine software program, MeTree, within NCCS breast cancer clinics. MeTree is a patient-facing family history based risk assessment tool and clinical decision aid that was developed by researchers within Duke's Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine (CAGPM). The initial intent of MeTree was to assist clinicians in identifying patients at greater than population risk based on a number of clinical and family health history (FHH) factors for a range of common conditions (including cancer) and provide clinical decision support (CDS) with specific recommendations based on common U.S. guidelines for prevention and screening.MeTree has been thoroughly tested and validated and is currently being implemented across five U.S. healthcare systems by way of a large cooperative grant through NHGRI's IGNITE network.2-7 Dr. Orlando is co-PI of this study and Dr. Wu served as a site PI.

Through the efforts of Drs. Wu and Orlando, among others, a research agreement was recently signed between Duke University and the National Heart Center Singapore (NHCS) to allow testing of MeTree within a cardiovascular epidemiologic study, the Biobank study (MeTree-Biobank pilot). The Biobank study is providing data to the SPECTRA healthy population database developed by the SingHealth/Duke-NUS Institute of Precision Medicine (PRISM). SPECTRA aims to collect detailed phenotypic and genomic information on 5,000 healthy Singaporeans. MeTree will be used to collect detailed FHH on Biobank participants. This collaboration is part of a larger partnership between CAGPM and PRISM to further develop cross-institution collaborations. Enrollment in the Biobank study is currently underway and incorporation of MeTree into the data capture flow started June 2017.

This proposal leverages the larger collaborative work already started to explore clinically meaningful applications of MeTree within SingHealth. While MeTree has been shown to be clinically effective within primary care clinics in the U.S., SingHealth's oncologists are interested in leveraging MeTree's risk assessment features both to establish a more organized, standardized, and systematic process for collecting information to enhance cancer management and to maximize the advances in precision medicine for the benefit of cancer patients. Therefore, in collaboration with SingHealth oncologist Dr. Ngeow, the principal investigators propose to explore, develop, and pilot a prototype MeTree cancer module through the following two aims:

Specific Aim 1: Create a Breast Cancer Clinical Decision Support Module in MeTree Specific Aim 2: Validate and Pilot the Breast Cancer Clinical Decision Support Module in a clinical setting within SingHealth.

APPROACH Specific Aim 1: Create a Breast Cancer Clinical Decision Support Module in MeTree. The prototype will focus on breast cancer, as a demonstration case, since the prevalence is high, the value of risk assessment is established, and MeTree already assesses risk for both familial and hereditary forms. To achieve this aim the investigators will work with Dr. Joanne Ngeow, head of the Cancer Genetics Service at NCCS, to understand current risk assessment practices in the oncology clinics, identify gaps and inefficiencies in meeting Singapore's risk assessment guidelines, and adapt MeTree to facilitate uptake of guideline-based care. All aspects of risk assessment will be evaluated, from gathering the right type of data to understanding the appropriate clinical actions that follow from each risk assessment result. The goals will be to: 1) create a MeTree integration plan for both patients and providers that will optimize its value, 2) incorporate additional data elements and risk algorithms into MeTree as appropriate, 3) generate tailored clinical decision support for the patient and their oncologist to facilitate appropriate ordering and interpretation of genetic tests. Drs. Wu, Orlando, and Ngeow will work together on all three steps, with Dr. Ngeow's expertise in genetics and oncology at SingHealth being critical for ensuring the team develops a useful and facile tool that meets the needs of SingHealth oncologists.

Deliverables These efforts will provide a breast cancer clinical decision support module that is ready for implementation testing in a breast cancer clinical environment. It will be a model upon which additional cancer CDS modules could be built, tested, and implemented.

Specific Aim 2: Validate and Pilot the Breast Cancer Clinical Decision Support Module in a clinical setting within SingHealth. To assess the feasibility and potential clinical utility of the Breast Cancer Clinical Decision Support Module, the investigators will perform a mixed-methods hybrid type II implementation-effectiveness pilot in the NCCS cancer genetics clinic and one additional surgical breast cancer clinic. The results of this 12-week pilot will inform both its potential impact on clinical care and how further to optimize it for broader clinical integration.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

102

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore
        • NCCS Cancer Genetics Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

  • New patients of the two intervention clinics (NCCS cancer genetics clinic and surgical breast cancer clinic) We will recruit 100 participants, of which 20 will be invited to participate in one to one interviews.
  • at least 10 employees in the above intervention clinics and the ongoing MeTree-Biobank pilot who are 1) staff assisting patients using MeTree, or 2) providers reviewing MeTree risk reports with patients.
  • 20 Healthy volunteers from the MeTree-Biobank pilot who have completed MeTree and agreed to re-contact for future studies, will be invited to participate in one to one interviews on the same topics as the patients in #1.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • New patients attending either of the two intervention clinics (NCCS cancer genetics clinic and surgical breast cancer clinic)
  • Employees in the above intervention clinics and the ongoing MeTree-Biobank pilot who are 1) staff assisting patients using MeTree, or 2) providers reviewing MeTree risk reports with patients, will be invited to participate in one to one interviews. We plan to recruit at least 10 employees for interviews.
  • Healthy volunteers from the MeTree-Biobank pilot who have completed MeTree and agreed to re-contact for future studies, will be invited to participate in one to one interviews on the same topics as the patients in #1. We will recruit 20 Biobank participants for interviews.

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Breast cancer patients
Breast cancer patients being seen at SingHealth
Software program collecting family health history and generating clinical decision support for risk-based preventive care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Risk Recommendations
Time Frame: post-study, up to six months
measure rate of increased hereditary cancer risk found in breast cancer population
post-study, up to six months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Provider adherence to risk recommendations
Time Frame: post-study, up to six months
measure provider actions in response to risk report (i.e. genetic counselling (GC) referrals ordered.)
post-study, up to six months
Participant adherence to risk recommendations
Time Frame: post-study, up to six months
measure participant actions in response to genetic counselling referrals ordered (i.e GC completed)
post-study, up to six months
Participant satisfaction with using MeTree risk platform
Time Frame: post-study, up to six months
measure patient satisfaction through post-MeTree survey
post-study, up to six months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lori A Orlando, MD MPH, Duke University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 7, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 23, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Pro00087654

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on MeTree

Subscribe