- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04648553
Task-Based Grounding Program
November 5, 2021 updated by: James T. Craig, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
A Pilot Randomized Control Trial of the Task-Based Grounding Program
The purpose of this study is to improve the availability of brief interventions to help children with defiant, aggressive and disruptive behaviors by creating a brief scalable intervention for parents delivered via telehealth.
As phase 1 study, we are conducting a 2-arm pilot feasibility RCT in order the intervention, measures, and procedures to be used in a larger efficacy trial.
The first arm will include a 3-session behavioral therapy treatment we call Task-Based Grounding and the second arm will be an enhanced treatment as usual comparison group.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The investigators have developed a 3-session psychosocial intervention for parents of children between 9-14 with disruptive behaviors.
The intervention uses telehealth visits along with written and online resources to teach them parent management skills.
To evaluate the acceptability of this intervention and the feasibility of our methods, the investigators will recruit 20 parent-child dyads to participate in this study.
This is a mixed methods pilot feasibility RCT design.
The investigators designed this study to test the acceptability of the intervention to parents and test the feasibility of our recruitment, retention, measurement, and delivery mechanisms for both the experimental and comparison conditions.
The investigators will use a block randomization method to separate parent-child dyads into either treatment or comparison groups.
The treatment condition involves 3 telehealth visits and a set of parenting resources.
The enhanced treatment as usual condition will involve contact with a "care navigator" that will assess behavior problems in the child and help the parents find an appropriate referral to care in their community.
Both groups will be followed for 10 weeks, provide outcome data, and participate in semi-structured qualitative interviews to accept acceptability.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
28
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
New Hampshire
-
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
9 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participating parent-child dyads must include a child between the ages of 9-14 years old and adult over the age of 18.
- The child must have a Vanderbilt Oppositional Defiant Disorder score >3
- The participating caregiver must be a legal guardian of participating child
Exclusion Criteria (child refers to the primary participant's child)
- Child ever been hospitalized for a psychiatric problem
- Child ever attempted suicide or stated that they had a plan to attempt suicide within the past year.
- Child ever engaged in self-harm behaviors
- Child has significant legal history such as adjudicated of a crime or been in diversion
- Child has ever been diagnosed with: Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Intellectual Disability or Developmental Delay, Speech or Hearing Delay, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Schizophrenia or another psychotic disorder, A substance abuse disorder (or had serious concerns about substance use).
- Parent can communicate in spoken English
- Parent is under the age of 18.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Task-Based Grounding
Participating parents will be provided with three 50-minute Task Based Grounding sessions using a standardized manual over 6 weeks.
|
Three 50 minutes sessions with an interventionist that includes 6 non-punitive components of treatment common in Behavioral Parent Trainings: Education on behavior change, positive one-on-one time between parents and their children, differential attending to positive and negative behaviors, effective praise, giving effective instructions, and using a point and reward system to encourage prosocial behaviors.
These components are distilled into 5 skill modules and paired with Task-Based Grounding, which involves a brief restriction of privileges and provides children with the opportunity to end the restriction by completing a prosocial task.
|
|
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Connected Care (Enhanced treatment as usual)
Participating parents will be provided with two sessions and one phone check-in call over 6 weeks.
They will work with a "care navigator" to assess their child's needs, find them an appropriate referral for care, and help problem solve barriers to finding a therapist.
|
Two sessions with a facilitator.
The facilitator does NOT provide any guidance to the parent on managing their child's behavior, but provides empathy and problem solving to help them find a resource that best fits their needs.
It is particularly geared towards helping parents connect with Behavioral Parent Trainings to address the needs of children with oppositional, defiant, or aggressive behaviors.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of referred participants
Time Frame: Through study completion, approximately 5 months.
|
Feasibility of recruitment will be measured by number of participants referred
|
Through study completion, approximately 5 months.
|
|
Number of participants who screen positive
Time Frame: Through study completion, approximately 5 months.
|
Feasibility of recruitment will be measured by number of participants who screen positive
|
Through study completion, approximately 5 months.
|
|
Change from Baseline Session attendance at visit 3
Time Frame: Session attendance will be taken at Session 1 (week 0) and Session 3 (week 6)
|
Feasibility of the participant retention in the program will be measured by session attendance by participants
|
Session attendance will be taken at Session 1 (week 0) and Session 3 (week 6)
|
|
Number of participants enrolled
Time Frame: Through study completion, approximately 5 months.
|
Feasibility of recruitment will be measured by number of participants enrolled
|
Through study completion, approximately 5 months.
|
|
Number of participants who complete all assessment measures
Time Frame: Through study completion, approximately 5 months.
|
Feasibility of assessment measures will be measured by number of participants who complete assessment measures
|
Through study completion, approximately 5 months.
|
|
Fidelity of the training provided
Time Frame: Through study completion, approximately 5 months.
|
as measured by having a trained listener code and score fidelity using a checklist developed specifically for the content of each session.
Audio recording of intervention sessions will be used.
There are 35 items on the checklist, each worth 1pt.
Score will be in terms of percentage, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score 100%.
|
Through study completion, approximately 5 months.
|
|
Intervention acceptability as measured by the Treatment Evaluation Inventory Short Form
Time Frame: Follow-up/post intervention (up to 10 weeks)
|
as measured by Treatment Evaluation Inventory Short Form post intervention which measures intervention acceptance.
The established cut off scores for determining if a treatment is acceptable is a score of 27.
Min score possible is 0, max score possible is 32.
Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.
|
Follow-up/post intervention (up to 10 weeks)
|
|
Intervention Acceptability as measured by the Therapy Attitude Inventory
Time Frame: Follow-up/post intervention (up to 10 weeks)
|
as measured by the Therapy Attitude Inventory post intervention which measures acceptability of behavioral parent trainings.
Min score of 1 is possible, max score of 50 is possible.
Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.
|
Follow-up/post intervention (up to 10 weeks)
|
|
Intervention Acceptability as measured by the Participant Experiences Questionnaire
Time Frame: Follow-up/post intervention (up to 10 weeks)
|
as measured by the Participant Experiences Questionnaire which measures acceptability of each skill module included in the program and is specific to program content.
Min score of 0 possible, max score of 36 possible.
Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.
|
Follow-up/post intervention (up to 10 weeks)
|
|
Acceptability as measured by qualitative interview
Time Frame: Follow-up/post intervention (up to 10 weeks)
|
as measured by 30 minute semi-structured qualitative interview with participants conducted by a research assistant trained and supervised by the study PI
|
Follow-up/post intervention (up to 10 weeks)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Adherence to the intervention
Time Frame: Available for completion every day for 10 weeks
|
as measured by daily logs that track both children's aggressive and defiant behaviors and parenting behaviors.
A count of each time a parent used a skill from the program will be used to estimate adherence and assess whether they matched the appropriate skills to the reported misbehaviors.
|
Available for completion every day for 10 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: James T Craig, Ph.D., Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
December 3, 2020
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
October 1, 2021
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
October 1, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 14, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 23, 2020
First Posted (ACTUAL)
December 1, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
November 8, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 5, 2021
Last Verified
November 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- D21019
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
-
King's College LondonActive, not recruitingAttention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder | Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder SymptomsUnited Kingdom
-
Cingulate TherapeuticsSuspendedPhase 3 Efficacy and Safety Laboratory Classroom Study in Pediatrics (6-12) With ADHD Using CTx-1301ADHD | Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder | Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity | ADHD - Combined Type | Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Combined | Attention Deficit Hyper Activity | Attention-deficit HyperactivityUnited States
-
Ornit CohenUnknownAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder | Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity | Attention Deficit Disorder | Attention Deficit Disorders With Hyperactivity | Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisordersIsrael
-
Cingulate TherapeuticsPremier Research Group plcCompletedADHD | Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder | ADHD - Combined Type | Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Combined | Attention Deficit Hyper Activity | Attention-deficit HyperactivityUnited States
-
Central South UniversityRecruitingAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity DisorderChina
-
Qbtech ABEnrolling by invitationAttention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity (ADHD) | Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD)United States
-
University of Texas at AustinRecruitingAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderUnited States
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); Louisiana State University Health...Recruiting
-
Universidade do Sul de Santa CatarinaAssociação Brasileira de Cannabis MedicinalRecruitingAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)Brazil
-
Nanjing Medical UniversityRecruitingAdult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChina
Clinical Trials on Task-Based Grounding
-
Ege UniversityRecruiting
-
Treatment InnovationsNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA); National Institutes...Completed
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalCompleted
-
German-Jordanian UniversityCompletedAlzheimer's DiseaseJordan
-
Ankara UniversityCompleted
-
Medline IndustriesF2 LabsCompletedAdhesion of the Neutral Electrode 21padUnited States
-
National Assembly ClinicBayero University Kano, NigeriaRecruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke Ischemic | Hemiparesis After StrokeNigeria
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingParkinson DiseasePakistan
-
Foundation University IslamabadCompletedCognitive Dysfunction | Cognitive Decline | Diabetic Neuropathy | BalancePakistan
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompletedSpinal Cord InjuryUnited States