Metformin for the Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)

October 9, 2023 updated by: K.R. van Straalen

Rediscovery of Metformin for the Chronic Disabling Auto-inflammatory Disease Hidradenitis Suppurativa

A randomized controlled trial investigating the metformin is the treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa. Metformin combined with doxycycline will be compared to the standard treatment of doxycycline monotherapy for HS severity and the effect on the pre-diabetic condition.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

62

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years at baseline
  • A diagnosis of HS for at least 1 year prior to baseline
  • mild to moderately active disease defined by a HS Physician Global Assessment (HS-PGA) score of 2-3 and the Refined Hurley classification of mild to moderate at baseline
  • Indication for systemic therapy; i.e. uncontrolled disease under conventional topical therapy.
  • Able and willing to give written informed consent and to comply with the study requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant and lactating women
  • Concomitant diabetes mellitus
  • Use of antibiotics within 14 days prior to baseline
  • Use of immunosuppressing/modulating therapies within 28 days prior to baseline
  • A known allergy to metformin or doxycycline or any of the ingredients metformin or doxycycline

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Metformin combined with doxycycline
Metformin in combination with doxycycline
Placebo Comparator: Doxycyline combined with placebo
Metformin in combination with doxycycline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
IHS4
Time Frame: 24 weeks
International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4)
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Insulin resistance
Time Frame: 12 and 24 weeks
• Change in insulin resistance from baseline using the HOMA-IR (based on fasting glucose and insulin levels) and differences between the groups at week 12 and 24.
12 and 24 weeks
Lesion Count
Time Frame: 12 and 24 weeks
• Change in lesion count from baseline and differences between the groups at 12 and 24 week. Difference in lesion count will be assessed between the groups at week 12 and 24.
12 and 24 weeks
NRS-Pain
Time Frame: 12 and 24 weeks
Change in skin related pain from baseline, on a numerical rating scale, and differences between the groups at week 12 (V2) and 24 (V4)
12 and 24 weeks
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: 24 weeks
• For cost-effectiveness the direct medical costs will be will be assessed using the iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ), The measurement will be at baseline, at 12 weeks and at 24 weeks. Productivity losses will be collected using the iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ) includes three modules measuring productivity losses of paid work due to 1) absenteeism and 2) presenteeism and productivity losses related to 3) unpaid work. The friction cost method for valuing the production losses will be applied in accordance to the Dutch manual for costing studies. Hence, the productivity loss will be valued per worker by age and gender and, for long term absences, taking into account that productivity costs to society is confined to the period needed to replace a worker (the friction period). Cost effectiveness will be estimated using Dutch manual for costing studies in economic evaluations (publication of the Health Care Institute (ZIN).
24 weeks
Bio-markers
Time Frame: 24 weeks
  • The correlation between baseline calprotectin levels and disease severity for both groups.
  • The correlation between calprotectin levels and treatment response in each group at week 12 and 24.
24 weeks
Safety and Tolerability
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks
• Incidence and severity of all adverse events (according to medDRA) will be analysed throughout the study, and renal function and lactate will be assessed at every visit.
up to 24 weeks
Metabolic syndrome
Time Frame: 12 and 24 weeks
Change in parameters of metabolic syndrome (waist circumference, blood pressure, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides) from baseline and differences between the groups at week 12 and 24.
12 and 24 weeks
Pre-diabetic disorder
Time Frame: 12 and 24 weeks
Change in HbA1c from baseline and differences between the groups at week 12 and week 24.
12 and 24 weeks
HiSCR
Time Frame: 12 and 24 weeks
The percentage of HiSCR achievers (a ≥ 50% reduction in inflammatory lesion count (abscesses + inflammatory nodules), and no increase in abscesses or draining fistulas when compared with baseline) and the difference between the groups at week 12 and 24.
12 and 24 weeks
HS-PGA
Time Frame: 12 and 24 weeks
The change in HS-PGA from baseline and the difference between the groups at week 12 and 24.
12 and 24 weeks
Flares
Time Frame: 12 and 24 weeks
Change in self-reported frequency of flares from baseline and differences between the groups at week 12 and 24.
12 and 24 weeks
DLQI
Time Frame: 12 and 24 weeks
Change in quality of life from baseline and differences between the groups, measured with the Dermatologic Life Quality Index and the EQ-5D, at week 12 and 24.
12 and 24 weeks
Treatment satisfaction
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks
Difference in treatment satisfaction and recommendation on a 5- and 3-point Likert scale respectively at week 12 and 24 between the groups.
up to 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 25, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 29, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 23, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Clinical Trials on Metformin

Subscribe