Feasibility of Evaluating XSTAT Use in the Prehospital Setting (PhoXSTAT)

December 12, 2024 updated by: Jan O. Jansen, University of Alabama at Birmingham

A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial of the XSTAT Hemostatic Device in the Prehospital Setting

This study evaluates the prehospital use of the XSTAT device to control bleeding in junctional wounds. Participants will be randomized to the use of XSTAT versus standard care.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The XSTAT® device injects small, rapidly-expanding cellulose sponges into the wound cavity using a syringe-like delivery system. In the wound, XSTAT® sponges expand and swell to fill the wound cavity, within 20 seconds of contact with blood, facilitating compression of bleeding structures. XSTAT® can be applied through skin wounds. The system can readily access deep vascular structures. While rapidly hemostatic, the hemostatic sponges are also relatively easy to remove. In the setting of junctional bleeding, XSTAT® may allow for hemostatic pressure generation from within the wound tract rather than from external compression (as with a tourniquet or manual compression).

Hemorrhage should be controlled as early as possible, ideally before reaching a trauma center or medical treatment facility. Given its small size, low weight, and ease of application, the XSTAT® device is well-suited for prehospital use, in both the civilian and military setting, and this is probably where the device's applicability lies.

The investigators anticipate that a full-scale trial will be conducted based on the questions this pilot study addresses, including the following:

  1. the number of penetrating junctional zone injuries encountered in the prehospital civilian setting.
  2. the feasibility of randomizing patients in the prehospital setting.
  3. usability.
  4. safety.
  5. validation of the proposed primary outcome of an efficacy trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • UAB Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥15 years or estimated body weight ≥50 kg.
  2. Penetrating junctional injury (femoral or axillary), with i. visible bleeding ii. too proximal to be controlled with a tourniquet
  3. Patient will be taken to participating level I trauma center, directly from the scene

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prisoners, children <15 years old, known pregnant patients.
  2. Patients receiving chest compressions (prior to XSTAT® use).
  3. Patients with an opt-out bracelet.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment with XSTAT
Participants randomized to the treatment arm will be treated using the study device - XSTAT.
XSTAT application will follow the manufacturer's guidance, with injection into bleeding junctional wounds. A sufficient number of sponges are used to fill the injury void. Repeated XSTAT application is performed in the event of persistent bleeding. The trial packs will contain two devices.
Other Names:
  • XSTAT 12
Other: Standard Care
Participants assigned to the control group receive standard prehospital care, consisting of direct pressure/dressings.
As currently provided by EMS services

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Record Blood Lactate Level Result
Time Frame: Baseline - on admission
Record results of routine test
Baseline - on admission
Base Deficit (mmol/l)
Time Frame: Baseline - on admission
Base excess and base deficit refer to an excess or deficit, respectively, in the amount of base present in the blood. The value is usually reported as a concentration in units of mEq/L (mmol/L), with positive numbers indicating an excess of base and negative a deficit. A typical reference range for base excess is -2 to +2 mEq/L. It is a test performed on a blood sample, venous or arterial. In trauma patients, a metabolic acidosis is indicative of the degree of shock, causing hypoperfusion. A more negative value indicates more severe acidosis, and more severe shock.
Baseline - on admission
Record Hemoglobin/Hematocrit Result
Time Frame: Baseline - on admission
Record results of routine test
Baseline - on admission
Record Platelet Count Result
Time Frame: Baseline - on admission
Record results of routine test
Baseline - on admission
Record Prothrombin Time Result
Time Frame: Baseline - on admission
Record results of routine test
Baseline - on admission
Record International Normalized Ratio (INR) Result
Time Frame: Baseline - on admission
Record results of routine test
Baseline - on admission
Record Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT) / Ratio Result
Time Frame: Baseline - on admission
Record results of routine test
Baseline - on admission
Record Thromboelastograph (TEG) Result if Available
Time Frame: Baseline - on admission
Record results of routine test
Baseline - on admission
Record Thromboelastogram (ROTEM) Result if Available
Time Frame: Baseline - on admission
Record results of routine test
Baseline - on admission
Ease of Use of XSTAT Device by EMS Personnel
Time Frame: From baseline to 29 months (enrollment phase)
To answer the question "Is the XSTAT device easy to use in the prehospital setting," the study case report forms capture whether EMS personnel found the device easy to insert into a wound, whether the sponges were expelled from the device easily, and whether the EMS personnel were satisfied or dissatisfied with the XSTAT device itself.
From baseline to 29 months (enrollment phase)
Sponge Removal: Surgeon Opinion of Ease of Removal, Time Required to Remove Sponges, Use of X-rays, Whether Surgeon Was Satisfied or Dissatisfied With the XSTAT Device.
Time Frame: From baseline to 29 months (enrollment phase)
Case report forms capture whether sponges were easy to remove, how much time was required to remove the sponges, whether x-rays were obtained to ensure that no sponges were left in the body, and whether the surgeon was satisfied or dissatisfied with the XSTAT device
From baseline to 29 months (enrollment phase)
Adverse Events From Use of XSTAT Device
Time Frame: Randomization through first 7 days, unless discharged earlier
All AEs, whether expected or unexpected will be recorded and reviewed throughout the trial. Each AE will be reported separately, with a description of the event, whether it was related to the device, whether it was serious, and whether it was expected or unexpected.
Randomization through first 7 days, unless discharged earlier
Survival at 30 Days
Time Frame: Hospital admission through 30 days
Time of death, or survival at 30 days will be recorded
Hospital admission through 30 days
Incidence of Patients With Hemorrhage From Junctional Wounds
Time Frame: Each participant was assessed at the time of arrival in hospital
The investigators will track the number of junctional wounds that are treated by participating EMS personnel versus the number of participants who were enrolled in this study. This will help the investigators understand how many wounds of this type happen, and how many would possibly benefit from the use of the XSTAT device.
Each participant was assessed at the time of arrival in hospital

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jan Jansen, MBBS, PhD, The University of Alabama at Birmingham

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 29, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 21, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 11, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 7, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 10, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemorrhage

Subscribe