- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04670380
Optimizing the Obstetrician's Movement During a Simulated Forceps Operative Vaginal Delivery (PERFORMAC) (PERFORMAC)
Optimizing the Obstetrician's Movement During a Simulated Forceps Operative Vaginal Delivery. A Biomechanical Study Using Optometric Captation (PERFORMAC)
Operative vaginal delivery is the main risk factor for pelvic floor trauma occurrence and especially for obstetric anal sphincter injuries. These complications are strongly and negatively impact women's health: fecal incontinence, perineal pain, sexual dysfunction.
The risk appears higher in case of operative vaginal delivery assisted by forceps compared to a vacuum delivery. This considered it is likely that optimizing the performance of the operator that perform the operative vaginal delivery will reduce the morbidity associated with this intervention. There are data bout how to optimize the placement of the forceps on the fetal head before performing the delivery but there are no data about the movement of the obstetrician during this intervention.
The objective is to analyse the posture and the movement of the obstetrician during a simulated forceps operative vaginal delivery using a 3D cinematic analysis. Secondary objectives are to analyse the traction force applied on the forceps during the delivery, to describe the different postures in terms of stability and last to compare the self-declared practice to the objectively observed.
This is a prospective study including 40 volunteers (medical doctors and registrars).
Each volunteer will perform a simulated operative vaginal delivery using a Suzor's Forceps on a high fidelity mannequin. Postures and movement will be assessed using optometric analysis. The force of traction will be assessed during the operative delivery thank to a force sensor on the forceps. The self declared practice collected thanks to individual questionnaires will be compared to the observed practice during the simulation.
The prospects are to identify the best posture and movement for performing an operative vaginal delivery and to promote tools for simulation of medical students.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Contacts and Locations
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
The population will be constituted of 40 volunteers that are medical doctor obstetricians or registrar in obstetrics with an experience of the operative vaginal delivery using Suzor's Forceps.
All the participants will be aged of 18 or more and will give their informed and written free consent before any investigation.
There is no patient in this study which is a simulation study performed on MD and registrar.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Medical doctor or registrar that have an experience of operative vaginal delivery using forceps in their clinical activity
Exclusion Criteria:
- No practice of the forceps at all
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Analysis of the postures and the movement during the simulated operative vaginal delivery
Time Frame: Day of inclusion
|
measures of angles on joints for the different phases of the operative vaginal delivery
|
Day of inclusion
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Analysis of the traction force during the operative delivery
Time Frame: Day of inclusion
|
Continuous measure of the traction force during the delivery (in Newton) thanks to a force sensor implemented in the forceps
|
Day of inclusion
|
|
Analysis of the postures in terms of stability
Time Frame: Day of inclusion
|
Measure of the gravity center projection, the support basis
|
Day of inclusion
|
|
Compare self-declared practice to the observed practice
Time Frame: Day of inclusion
|
Comparison of the postures self-declared in a questionnaire immediately before the simulation to those observed during the simulation
|
Day of inclusion
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- PERFORMAC
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Obstetric Trauma
-
London North West Healthcare NHS TrustImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustNot yet recruitingMental Health Impairment | Obstetric Complication | Incontinence | Perineal Tear | Obstetric Trauma | Relation, Mother-Child | Relation, FamilyUnited Kingdom
-
TriHealth Inc.CompletedObstetric TraumaUnited States
-
Ostergotland County Council, SwedenCompletedPerineal Tear | Obstetric Trauma
-
Baylor College of MedicineMaterna MedicalCompletedTear, Pelvic Organ, Obstetric TraumaUnited States
-
TriHealth Inc.CompletedObstetric Trauma | Sphincter Ani IncontinenceUnited States
-
Advanced Tactile Imaging, Inc.CompletedPelvic Floor | Obstetric Trauma | Perineal RuptureUnited States, Czechia
-
University of PadovaUniversity of FlorenceCompletedOther Obstetric Trauma - DeliveredItaly
-
Hanna JangöRegion Hovedstadens ApotekCompletedInfections | Wound Dehiscence | Obstetric TraumaDenmark
-
Imperial College LondonBritish Medical Research CouncilCompletedPremature Birth | Brain InjuryUnited Kingdom
-
Rabin Medical CenterTel Aviv UniversityRecruitingObstetric Labor Complications | Obstetric TraumaIsrael
Clinical Trials on Posture and movement analysis during a simulated forceps vaginal operative delivery
-
Thomas Jefferson UniversityAbbVieCompletedMyelodysplastic Syndrome | Recurrent Myelodysplastic Syndrome | Refractory Myelodysplastic SyndromeUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingRecurrent Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Activated B-Cell Type | Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Activated B-Cell TypeUnited States, Saudi Arabia
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedGanglioneuroblastoma | High Risk NeuroblastomaUnited States, New Zealand, Australia
-
Children's Oncology GroupNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedLocalized Resectable Neuroblastoma | Localized Unresectable Neuroblastoma | Regional Neuroblastoma | Stage 4S Neuroblastoma | Ganglioneuroblastoma | Stage 4 NeuroblastomaUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingNeuroblastoma | Ganglioneuroblastoma, NodularUnited States, Canada, Puerto Rico, Australia, New Zealand